Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > Caylee Anthony 2 years old

Notices

Caylee Anthony 2 years old Not reported missing for a month after she was last seen.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 06-05-2010, 11:22 AM
beach's Avatar
beach beach is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
Posts: 13,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhornsby View Post
You are missing the point, that deposition was a staged show. It is unheard of that the media can tape a deposition as it is being conducted and it is equally unheard of for the transcript to be released in real time. If Conway would have known what he was doing the deposition would have been cancelled.

Compare to Nancy Grace's deposition in the duckett case, no media, no camera's, no attorneys mugging for the camera.

BBM

I get your point and good analogy with NG's depo.

Make no mistake, I am NOT impressed with Brad Conway, however, I know from personal experience client control can be a nightmare, especially with strong-willed, stubborn clients like CA. In re. the bolded portion, exactly what grounds would BC have for cancelling the depo? Are you referring to the video taping w/o their knowledge?

eta: I'm not so sure the media taped it. I thought it was Morgan & co. taping and releasing it to the media pronto. I know it was posted on the Morgan website.
__________________
Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.

Last edited by beach; 06-05-2010 at 11:29 AM.
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to beach For This Useful Post:
  #77  
Old 06-05-2010, 11:24 AM
Just Jayla's Avatar
Just Jayla Just Jayla is offline
I love my APBT
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Culpeper, Virginia
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentjbkent View Post
Just a reminder....this thread is in relation to what was seen at the CRIMINAL trial hearing in front of Judge Perry.....
Sorry if we are straying-we were discussing/writing about RHornsby's experience Tuesday and I was wondering if Amil experienced the same thing. (hope it's not getting lost in minutiae)
Will try to get back on course!!
  #78  
Old 06-05-2010, 01:20 PM
Spangle's Avatar
Spangle Spangle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhornsby View Post
You are missing the point, that deposition was a staged show. It is unheard of that the media can tape a deposition as it is being conducted and it is equally unheard of for the transcript to be released in real time. If Conway would have known what he was doing the deposition would have been cancelled.

Compare to Nancy Grace's deposition in the duckett case, no media, no camera's, no attorneys mugging for the camera.
JB's games are staged as well. What point am I missing. It's ok for JB and other lawyers, but not CM? That is the only point I am seeing here.

Alot of JB's games have also been unheard of. Again, the point? I have been totally blown away by the stuff he is getting away with pulling.

It was stated before the depos that the media would have it right away. That knowledge was a news item. Even wondered about HOW it would be done, as the info was being discussed on the hows, etc. Folks were on pins and needles and primed for it to happen.

Sorry, Conway did not walk into that room, clueless that it was going to be broadcasted right away. It was known the day before. If I was a guessing person (and I am) I would guess that he considered it the least of his worries. That the tape/transcription would be released at some point anyway. His worries, was his client's attitude. As all ready pointed out, Cindy's show pretty much puts everything else in the shade. Most likely that is what was on Brad's mind. All he could do was ride that storm.

Snort! No mugging for the camera's.. NG's lawyers don't need to mug for the camera's like these newbies involved in these cases down here. Part of their fee is the 'mugging for the camera's." LOL!
__________________
Just my opinion.....
Finally found a reason for the Ignore feature!
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Spangle For This Useful Post:
  #79  
Old 06-05-2010, 11:56 PM
mitzi's Avatar
mitzi mitzi is offline
Watch us lie to cover for 'Princess'
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach2yall View Post
BBM

I get your point and good analogy with NG's depo.

Make no mistake, I am NOT impressed with Brad Conway, however, I know from personal experience client control can be a nightmare, especially with strong-willed, stubborn clients like CA. In re. the bolded portion, exactly what grounds would BC have for cancelling the depo? Are you referring to the video taping w/o their knowledge?

eta: I'm not so sure the media taped it. I thought it was Morgan & co. taping and releasing it to the media pronto. I know it was posted on the Morgan website.
Bold red mine.

ITA agree with the above red bold.

Morgan releasing the depos to the media is no different from what the defense has done by releasing motions to the media before giving them to the clerk of the court...even in at least one case, releasing motions to the media without filing them at all!
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mitzi For This Useful Post:
  #80  
Old 06-06-2010, 07:30 AM
zoey's Avatar
zoey zoey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitzi View Post
Bold red mine.

ITA agree with the above red bold.

Morgan releasing the depos to the media is no different from what the defense has done by releasing motions to the media before giving them to the clerk of the court...even in at least one case, releasing motions to the media without filing them at all!
it was morgan and morgan....And totlaly agree Brad knew, ca knew, ga knew....everyone knew it would be released....ca even had her own camera iirc....so


Do appreciate all the info from those at the trial! Thanks for letting us in on some of the little things we can only speculate on .....
__________________
jmo
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zoey For This Useful Post:
  #81  
Old 06-06-2010, 11:43 AM
my2sense's Avatar
my2sense my2sense is offline
Me - in the old country
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 1,261
Anyone in the know, please chime in on this: It seems to me that Judges have already made their decisions on motions before they hear arguments, because they already have case law at hand to support their decision. So, what do they do? Have case law ready to go either way? How does that work? TIA

Last edited by my2sense; 06-06-2010 at 11:45 AM. Reason: remove an apostrophe
  #82  
Old 06-07-2010, 02:51 AM
Jomo's Avatar
Jomo Jomo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by my2sense View Post
Anyone in the know, please chime in on this: It seems to me that Judges have already made their decisions on motions before they hear arguments, because they already have case law at hand to support their decision. So, what do they do? Have case law ready to go either way? How does that work? TIA
This would be a really good question to include in the lawyers' thread! I look forward to the answer.
__________________
It's the journey, not the destination.
The Following User Says Thank You to Jomo For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2010.06.01 Hearing mac66 Caylee Anthony 2 years old 509 06-01-2010 05:27 PM
2010.05.06 Budget Hearing beach Caylee Anthony 2 years old 1156 05-07-2010 01:16 AM
2010.03.18 KC's indigency hearing #2 Kimster Caylee Anthony 2 years old 30 03-19-2010 04:31 PM
2010.01.25 Hearing JBean Caylee Anthony 2 years old 661 01-25-2010 07:05 PM
Personal Experience, Family and Friends Becba Up to the Minute 26 09-27-2005 05:20 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!