ID - Rachael Anderson, 40, 16 Apr 2010 - Latah County, Charles Capone, 1st Deg Murder - Page 2

info123 · #26 06-21-2010, 05:50 PM

I find to money trail interesting also....I hope LE has done the usual check on Life insurance and where that all goes.

info123 · #27 06-21-2010, 05:54 PM

[quote=letsgosleuth;5313732]I went to a domestic violence safehouse fundraiser last night and I was reminded, the Most Dangerous time for an abused woman is when she is leaving, telling him she is leaving or escaping. This is when the attacker is most likely to hurt her the worst. In Rachael's situation, she told CC she was divorcing him and then the stalking began. It was when she went to see him, get her car back and he attacked (most likely in the most violent manner). Anti-stalking laws need to be stricter - a piece of paper telling him to stay away is not working. Please support your local safehouse so women and children have a place to go which is safe and hidden from their attackers. Thank you.

"a piece of paper telling him to stay away is not working." Is this in general?? Rachael didn't have an restraining or protection order right?

SuziQ · #28 06-21-2010, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hollyblue

Wonder why a new thread?

I'm also wondering why no info or updates on RA's case. Nothing from media, LE, or even the family now.???

The mods like to keep the threads limited to a manageable amount of pages. This is the fifth new thread. In the first post you will see links to the previous four.

monkeymama · #29 06-21-2010, 11:28 PM

I haven't been able to get on the computer for awhile now and I was really hoping that I'd hear something more but no. As far as local news, one of my friends summed it up perfectly for me. "KLEW is like nails on a chalkboard" Pretty accurate imo. I'm very dissapointed that there has not been any news.

hollyblue · #30 06-22-2010, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by info123

I find to money trail interesting also....I hope LE has done the usual check on Life insurance and where that all goes.

You know, this gets me to thinking. Exactly how long had she been at the Lab? It's normally 90 days of employment for any benefits...including life insurance, so it seems her 90 days would have just taken effect, no? I'm thinking she was full time. TIA

1forevry1 · #31 06-22-2010, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hollyblue

You know, this gets me to thinking. Exactly how long had she been at the Lab? It's normally 90 days of employment for any benefits...including life insurance, so it seems her 90 days would have just taken effect, no? I'm thinking she was full time. TIA

She had been there I believe 3-4 months, not long, but long enough for benefits I would think. IMO.

PC is right, the RA page doesn't like anything negative to be said and so most of the page is just all about offering up prayers and thoughts. When someone does ask a question it usually goes unanswered.

I can't even begin to imagine if this was my mom. There is no way I would remain this quiet, or even let the media drop off. I would be like the person they see walk in the door and all you hear is "oh man not again"... I just can't imagine. I know they are struggling but come one. Why would you want the disappearance of your mom just swept under the rug? I know I wouldn't and I won't ever do it to Rachael, I will always do whatever I can. Which isn't much.

And as far as I know , NO there was no restraining order on CC.

info123 · #32 06-22-2010, 12:05 PM

A lot of people....especially people with kids...carry a life insurance policy even if one is not offered though their work. You can usually even get a policy through your car insurance company.

And of course you never know how you would react if you were in their shoes so I'm not judging...and I won't be popular for even saying this...but a lot of things that the family has done hasn't ever made since to me....no accusations there..JMO

1forevry1 · #33 06-22-2010, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by info123

A lot of people....especially people with kids...carry a life insurance policy even if one is not offered though their work. You can usually even get a policy through your car insurance company.

And of course you never know how you would react if you were in their shoes so I'm not judging...and I won't be popular for even saying this...but a lot of things that the family has done hasn't ever made since to me....no accusations there..JMO

*BBM

I am gonna have to agree with this. I know one never really knows what they would do until put in that position themselves, but between family and LE I am just so flippin clueless.

I understand the girls are young, they don't really know what to do, and are struggling on top of taking thing day to day.... but I dunno. Alot of things just aren't "RIGHT" if ya know what I mean.

1forevry1 · #34 06-22-2010, 05:51 PM

This was posted from Ashley on the RA FB page.

No new updates, They are still working hard on the case even thought we do not get to know the details of their work for the sake of the case. They are still working day and night. If we get any new updates we will not hesitate to post them.
Thank you for all the support

http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php...1683607&ref=ts

PickieChickie · #35 06-22-2010, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1forevry1

*BBM

I am gonna have to agree with this. I know one never really knows what they would do until put in that position themselves, but between family and LE I am just so flippin clueless.

I understand the girls are young, they don't really know what to do, and are struggling on top of taking thing day to day.... but I dunno. Alot of things just aren't "RIGHT" if ya know what I mean.

The thing that annoys me the most is that they announced the bake sale so a reward fund could be opened and encouraged people to bring baked goods as well as purchase them, something which was announced in the newspaper and I believe on TV as well.

Where is the newspaper article and accompanying flyer announcing the amount of the reward?
It's been almost 1 1/2 months since the bake sales!

info123 · #36 06-22-2010, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PickieChickie

The thing that annoys me the most is that they announced the bake sale so a reward fund could be opened and encouraged people to bring baked goods as well as purchase them, something which was announced in the newspaper and I believe on TV as well.

Where is the newspaper article and accompanying flyer announcing the amount of the reward?
It's been almost 1 1/2 months since the bake sales!

I agree...It's not right and IMO boardering on not legal. Thats why I wonder about life insurance and such. Someone knows about CC...his past....and things that happened between him and Rachael....you couldn't have made a better fall guy if you tried.....everyone latched on to him as a suspect and never let go.....what if...just what if...it wasn't him????

PickieChickie · #37 06-22-2010, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by info123

I agree...It's not right and IMO boardering on not legal. Thats why I wonder about life insurance and such. Someone knows about CC...his past....and things that happened between him and Rachael....you couldn't have made a better fall guy if you tried.....everyone latched on to him as a suspect and never let go.....what if...just what if...it wasn't him????

When a sheriff deputy was murdered in my county, a woman announced through the media she had opened a bank account to accept donations for the officer's family.

When she did not give any of the thousands of dollars received to the family, she was sentenced to six years in prison for fraud.

In my opinion, if the money collected during the bake sales was not used as Rachael's daughter, Amber Griswold, stated it would be used to the members of the Facebook group "Help find my missing mom! Rachael Anderson" and to the media, that is downright fraud.

Donations have also been sought to "help maintain the estate of Rachael Anderson". As I stated before, it seems more important to keep the electricity on and the credit card, house and automobile payments up than offer a reward, something which I've never heard of in a missing person case and which mystifies me.

1forevry1 · #38 06-22-2010, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by info123

I agree...It's not right and IMO boardering on not legal. Thats why I wonder about life insurance and such. Someone knows about CC...his past....and things that happened between him and Rachael....you couldn't have made a better fall guy if you tried.....everyone latched on to him as a suspect and never let go.....what if...just what if...it wasn't him????

I have thought this myself. I think he had a PART in it, just because he is slime and that is what I want to believe, but in my heart of hearts, I almost can GUARANTEE someone else has played a hand in this also/too. You are exactly right, he is the PERFECT fall guy.

hollyblue · #39 06-23-2010, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1forevry1

She had been there I believe 3-4 months, not long, but long enough for benefits I would think. IMO.

PC is right, the RA page doesn't like anything negative to be said and so most of the page is just all about offering up prayers and thoughts. When someone does ask a question it usually goes unanswered.

I can't even begin to imagine if this was my mom. There is no way I would remain this quiet, or even let the media drop off. I would be like the person they see walk in the door and all you hear is "oh man not again"... I just can't imagine. I know they are struggling but come one. Why would you want the disappearance of your mom just swept under the rug? I know I wouldn't and I won't ever do it to Rachael, I will always do whatever I can. Which isn't much.

And as far as I know , NO there was no restraining order on CC.

I hope she changed all her financial beneficiaries over to the kids or maybe didn't have the time to change them over in the few months she was with CC. Since she started her job with the lab after CC, I'm sure she wouldn't have listed him.

No, this can't be easy for them at all, trying to go on in some normalcy for your kids and even your own sanity I'd think. Hope to hear something soon.

hollyblue · #40 06-23-2010, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PickieChickie

When a sheriff deputy was murdered in my county, a woman announced through the media she had opened a bank account to accept donations for the officer's family.

When she did not give any of the thousands of dollars received to the family, she was sentenced to six years in prison for fraud.

In my opinion, if the money collected during the bake sales was not used as Rachael's daughter, Amber Griswold, stated it would be used to the members of the Facebook group "Help find my missing mom! Rachael Anderson" and to the media, that is downright fraud.

Donations have also been sought to "help maintain the estate of Rachael Anderson". As I stated before, it seems more important to keep the electricity on and the credit card, house and automobile payments up than offer a reward, something which I've never heard of in a missing person case and which mystifies me.

When things like this happen, it can become terribly drawing on the finances. While I agree a reward might help in finding answers or RA herself, emotionally they may have wanted to assure things were in order if she came home. But, now I think they should be thinking about what their next move should be since there are no active searches going on. I don't know if RA rented or owned. If she rented, they could just hold on to her belongings and if she did own a house, they could rent it, if one of the kids didn't want to move into it and maintain it for her. Tough decisions. I can't say I wouldn't have trouble with it.

OT..just heard on JVM tonight of the little Baum girl that has been missing for a year. The mother is practically homeless now. She lost her job and has a another child that is autistic. She moved in with family, but that did not work out. Trying to live on just the SS she gets for the other child. It's really sad and traumatic how this sends a person/family into a upheaval.

I wonder how the boys are getting along. I hope they are in touch with each other on a frequent basis. Ugh.

1forevry1 · #41 06-23-2010, 11:11 AM

I do believe that Rachael owned her house. Gotta be a tough decision on what to do there. If either one of the kids rented where they were living I would uproot there and move into Rachaels house. Spend the money on making sure her home was kept up and not forking money out in 2 spots, but I don't know the logistics of any of that either so who knows!

1forevry1 · #42 06-23-2010, 12:12 PM

Detectives are continuing their search for Rachael Anderson.

But after more than two months since the 41-year-old Clarkston woman's disappearance, the flow of information to detectives has slowed to a trickle.

Fewer tips are coming in now than there were two months ago, noted Moscow Assistant Police Chief David Duke, and the task force is meeting less regularly to discuss the case.

"It's still coming in, but it's obviously a lot slower than it was to begin with," Clarkston Police Detective Dan Combs said.

The task force, which Combs said was meeting as often as twice a week, is now meeting on an as-needed basis. The task force last met on June 11, Combs said.

Detectives assigned to the case are renewing requests to the public for information, encouraging anyone with a possible tip as to Anderson's disappearance to report it to police, regardless of how minute it may seem.

Amber Griswold, Anderson's oldest daughter, said she hasn't talked to the task force about her mother's disappearance in a few weeks. Waiting has been difficult for Anderson's children, she said, and their mother's birthday earlier this month was an especially hard day. But Anderson is never far from her daughter's mind.

Much of the case has been referred back to the Clarkston Police Department, and Clarkston Police Chief Joel Hastings said it remains a suspicious missing-person case.

Anderson's estranged husband, Charles A. Capone of Moscow, was the last person known to have seen his wife April 16 in Moscow. Capone, 48, has been named a person of interest in his wife's disappearance, and is presently awaiting trial on unrelated federal weapons charges.

Capone, a twice-convicted felon, is in custody of the Bonner County Jail without bond on two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm that court documents allege he possessed in October 2009 and February. He pleaded innocent to the charges last month and is scheduled for trial July 6.

Detectives note Capone has not been charged in connection with his wife's disappearance, nor has he been named as a suspect.

"It's still an active investigation," he said. "Of course the case is going to remain open until there's developments."

http://www.lmtribune.com/story/northwest/511810/

1forevry1 · #43 06-23-2010, 12:57 PM

http://www.khq.com/Global/story.asp?S=12696209

LEWISTON, Idaho (AP) - Detectives say the pace of tips about the whereabouts of a missing woman last seen in April has slowed.

Meanwhile, Rachael Anderson's estranged husband the last known person to see her remains in an Idaho jail awaiting separate federal weapons charges.

info123 · #44 06-23-2010, 02:44 PM

I just hope that in the immediate focus on CC something else wasn't missed. I thought there was a news report that stated she was renting her home.....also idaho is a 50/50 property state....so if she bought a house before the divorce was final with CC the house would have been half his....so it would be a really bad decision for her to buy a house while she was filing for divorce.

summer_breeze · #45 06-23-2010, 05:55 PM

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420a...oman_tips.html

Last updated June 23, 2010 10:09 a.m. PT
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Quote:

LEWISTON, Idaho -- The pace of tips being received about the whereabouts of a missing southeastern Washington woman, who was last seen in April, has slowed, detectives say.

Meanwhile, Rachael Anderson's estranged husband - the last known person to see her - remains in an Idaho jail awaiting separate federal weapons charges.

1forevry1 · #46 06-23-2010, 09:56 PM

http://www.kxly.com/news/24014317/detail.html

Maybe? Maybe not.

PickieChickie · #47 06-23-2010, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1forevry1

http://www.kxly.com/news/24014317/detail.html

Maybe? Maybe not.

It's downriver from the bridge which could indicate the body was tossed off the bridge then floated downstream. I wonder what Susan Powell wore to bed. It could be her too.

1forevry1 · #48 06-23-2010, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PickieChickie

It's downriver from the bridge which could indicate the body was tossed off the bridge then floated downstream. I wonder what Susan Powell wore to bed. It could be her too.

OO That is true, dang I have mixed feelings. I want them found, but not like this... but still want them found.

PickieChickie · #49 06-23-2010, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1forevry1

OO That is true, dang I have mixed feelings. I want them found, but not like this... but still want them found.

I have a Google alert set up for body found and receive an e-mail every time a news article hits the Internet. The majority of bodies found in water are victims of accidental drowning. I don't think tossing a body off a bridge is a very good way to make sure it isn't found. I'd be surprised if it is Rachael or Susan.

AmandaReckonwith · #50 06-23-2010, 11:00 PM

Since we have the new thread, here is the link to the case archive album:

http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/m...son%20%20-ID-/