Start from the beginning

[chicoliving]

Clean slate. Start the discussion about this case following the rules, etiquette and TOS.

If you think a post is in violation of any of the above then use the 'report post' feature.

Start the threads for your discussion with an appropriate subject title. It would be helpful if there were threads with background on this case from the beginning so newbies will have an idea on just what this case is entails.

Keep your gloves on and keep it clean.

[Nova]

Personally, I don't see it. But if it is true that WS and its mods somehow "favor" those who believe justice was miscarried in the WM3 case, I have to wonder why?

As anyone can see with even a brief look around, Websleuths tends to be enthusiastically pro-victim and very sympathetic to LE efforts to put perpetrators of violent crimes behind bars.

I am NOT claiming the mods are unfair to those who argue for a defendant's innocence, just that this site attracts a membership that tends to be pro-prosecution in most cases, and the mods themselves are usually drawn from that membership.

So why, I wonder, is the WM3 case and forum supposedly just the opposite? (My own answer, as I said, is that it isn't. But I'd love to hear the reasoning of those who feel the mods are somehow conspiring to free guilty child-murderers.)

[Sunnyone]

Nova:

I would suspect that there will be no response to the question, as most "nons" no longer post here. That's all I will say.

[chicoliving]

Start a thread for each subject you want to discuss. I moved a few to start the process. It's more effective for discussion.

Alibis

Theories

Appeals

Evidence would be a good discussion thread.

A thread for each perp/defendent would be a good discussion topic.

You get the idea. Start from the beginning and thread out the subjects so those that don't have a clue about who or what this case involves will have a chance to read and comprehend. Lay out the facts and go from there.