Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > Caylee Anthony 2 years old

Notices

Caylee Anthony 2 years old Not reported missing for a month after she was last seen.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #426  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:44 PM
Riley1833 Riley1833 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amil View Post
You are absolutely correct and I will not say anything to anyone. I guess I was just thinking out loud.
I agree...you would simply put a target on your back...but I would try to sit as close as possible and see if I could eavesdrop. I was also wondering if you ever do a drive by on Hopespring??
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Riley1833 For This Useful Post:
  #427  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:52 PM
Boots-OK's Avatar
Boots-OK Boots-OK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyvictoria View Post
Cindy will get on the stand and play the poor bereaved grandmother in an act worthy of an academy award. She'll probably throw in a little giggling and eyelash-batting at HHJP for good measure.

OR

She'll be tranquilized and barely conscious.

Either way, I predict Casey will have a hard time holding back the hatred for her mother. The officers may want to consider keeping the handcuffs on her that day.

JMO
BBM
I agree, NYV - also wondering if we may get to see a repeat of KC's previous tearful plea:

"Make them stop"
"Make them stop"
__________________
Remembering Taylor and Skyla
"The children of our hearts" ..... Claycat
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Boots-OK For This Useful Post:
  #428  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:52 PM
joypath's Avatar
joypath joypath is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: new england
Posts: 1,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by notthatsmart View Post
I think Ca is going to speak from experience. Her husband is former Le and when they are not responding, you need only apply pressure to get them to respond. IMO She is prolly going to say she said it to get them to respond and that is going to be the end of it. IMO The Judge will prolly rule for the state just the same and let the Jury listen to Ca's testimony. IMO The Judge will prolly let the jury decide whether Ca is being truthful or not. IMO Easy out for a Judge, but a huge responsibility for the state. IMO The jury may find Ca believable. IMO
Okay, I CAN'T let this post go unanswered on so many levels.
Cindy Anthony's experience as WHAT...the wife of a member of LE? Speaking as one such creature (mine is retired State homicide, highly decorated), extrapolating FACTS aka "Anthony mistruths" to "only apply pressure to get them to respond" to ANY division of LE is dancing on the edge of, if not falling into, illegal behavior, providing a false police report or as ICA is well aware, lying to LEO! Guess she never helped him study for promotional exams, you DO learn so much!
Now, if you're talking about CA's wifely experience vs actions toward HER husband, the "only apply pressure to get them to respond" just MIGHT be the only tool in her toolshed but not a universal axiom!
IF she makes the inane statement UNDER OATH that she was using the odor of a corpse to emphasize a need to Code 3, there will be some explaining to follow that better sound more rational than "hurry because I smell icky stuff" vs "hey you guys & gals with families and committed by oath to protect and serve, there's a missing, possibly kidnapped innocent almost 3 year old child in imminent danger"
Heck NO! Just 'cause CA says something, that isn't the end of it!

The jury should find CA very believable as a very upset, spontaneous utterer of the truth during that 911 call and may sit with mouths collectively catching flies as CA attempts to modify her extemporaneous 911 call with semi-scripted courtroom banter.
__________________
“Hic locus est ubi mors gaudet succure vitae”– Giovanni Margagni

"This is the place where death rejoices to teach those who live."-
Giovanni Margagni
  #429  
Old 07-09-2010, 03:10 PM
LambChop's Avatar
LambChop LambChop is offline
WS Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: CT/NC
Posts: 17,568
Well said, Joypath. I have a question. If CA lies on the stand and SA catches her will they just use CA's deposition and present that to the jury. CA can't help KC now unless she does tell the truth. It must be hard for JB to think about presenting a case when he does not know how CA will respond to questions from SA. JB can't very well tell her to "Zip it" in court. jmo
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:
  #430  
Old 07-09-2010, 03:16 PM
Mamabear1963's Avatar
Mamabear1963 Mamabear1963 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by joypath View Post
Okay, I CAN'T let this post go unanswered on so many levels.
Cindy Anthony's experience as WHAT...the wife of a member of LE? Speaking as one such creature (mine is retired State homicide, highly decorated), extrapolating FACTS aka "Anthony mistruths" to "only apply pressure to get them to respond" to ANY division of LE is dancing on the edge of, if not falling into, illegal behavior, providing a false police report or as ICA is well aware, lying to LEO! Guess she never helped him study for promotional exams, you DO learn so much!
Now, if you're talking about CA's wifely experience vs actions toward HER husband, the "only apply pressure to get them to respond" just MIGHT be the only tool in her toolshed but not a universal axiom!
IF she makes the inane statement UNDER OATH that she was using the odor of a corpse to emphasize a need to Code 3, there will be some explaining to follow that better sound more rational than "hurry because I smell icky stuff" vs "hey you guys & gals with families and committed by oath to protect and serve, there's a missing, possibly kidnapped innocent almost 3 year old child in imminent danger"
Heck NO! Just 'cause CA says something, that isn't the end of it!


The jury should find CA very believable as a very upset, spontaneous utterer of the truth during that 911 call and may sit with mouths collectively catching flies as CA attempts to modify her extemporaneous 911 call with semi-scripted courtroom banter.

BBM

First, I just wanted to say thank you Joypath!!! Thank you, Thank you!!!

I had another thought...I don't think CA in her panic could have thought about saying anything about a dead body in the car...just to get LE there...and if she wasn't panicked...then she has the issue of lying to LE as others have said.

Kudos to those who have listened to the tapes and videos again...I don't think I could.

5 more days...fa la la la
__________________
Sitting. on. hands.

The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Mamabear1963 For This Useful Post:
  #431  
Old 07-09-2010, 04:04 PM
ziggy's Avatar
ziggy ziggy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern Cal
Posts: 4,209
I fell asleep last night during the third one BUT that second one is interesting. It is so impossible for Cindy to let anyone get a word in without her jumping in to confuse the issues. She's got personality disorders for sure.

I am very well acquainted with a sociopath who does the same thing - our therapist called it "crazy making". They just insert useless confusing information to keep everyone from actually getting down to the brass tacks.

When confronted with all the lies and people who DO NOT EXIST information (after many attempts to get her to just shut up and listen) she does not react with any shock, sorrow, nothing. In fact - she attempts to jump in and explain at times. She is just not right.

Thank you for posting these interveiws again. Cindy is in for a frustrating fight. She has painted herself into a corner by starting out with "maybe that's why Casey fabricated this story" and then changing her story as the LEO tries to point out. She even admits there is no nanny, and her main suspect is Jesse. When confronted with the fact that Jesse does not have Caylee, she insists he knows who does. Cindy is as much a pathological liar as her daughter imo. She can't be wrong - (borderline personality); she sticks with a story to absurdity and then has no qualms about changing it and then sticking with that one.

When I come into contact with these types of people I RUN the other way and shut them out. She will continue to be a handful. Getting her to submit to making a point or answering a question in a straightforward manner will be next to impossible I don't care how skilled the prosecutors are.

Also, duh - just telling LE that your 2 year old was kidnapped is enough to get them there pronto. There was no need for her to elaborate about the car. Regardless, the state has many levels of getting the 911 introduced and excited utterance is only one arrow in their quiver. It will come in. Can't wait until Thursday...but my gut says it's not going to happen. Something will come up.
__________________
__________________
Disclaimer: while I have graduated law school and hold a JD, I am not yet licensed to practice. Therefore, if I say anything which could possibly be considered legal advice, or if I explain anything related to legal matters, rules of evidence, legal procedures, or anything related to law, please be aware that I do not yet hold a bar card and we have no attorney/client relationship. Please always, always talk to a personal attorney, and follow their directions. Please also follow the TOS in regards to all unverified posters. Thank you!
  #432  
Old 07-09-2010, 04:52 PM
Amil's Avatar
Amil Amil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: downtown Orlando
Posts: 1,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riley1833 View Post
I agree...you would simply put a target on your back...but I would try to sit as close as possible and see if I could eavesdrop. I was also wondering if you ever do a drive by on Hopespring??
Once. I was visiting the Memorial site and drove by the house. Lee's black car was in the driveway. I felt like vomiting. This was back in 2009 when the memorial site was highly decorated.
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Amil For This Useful Post:
  #433  
Old 07-09-2010, 04:59 PM
Mamabear1963's Avatar
Mamabear1963 Mamabear1963 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy View Post
Also, duh - just telling LE that your 2 year old was kidnapped is enough to get them there pronto. There was no need for her to elaborate about the car. Regardless, the state has many levels of getting the 911 introduced and excited utterance is only one arrow in their quiver. It will come in. Can't wait until Thursday...but my gut says it's not going to happen. Something will come up.

respectfully snipped and BBM

no kidding

CA had NO idea the nationwide coverage she would end up having nor how that would impact her life.
__________________
Sitting. on. hands.

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Mamabear1963 For This Useful Post:
  #434  
Old 07-09-2010, 05:31 PM
RR0004's Avatar
RR0004 RR0004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by essies View Post
I agree with ohiogirl-but, man that would have to be one of the toughest gigs around right now!! Imagine being so close and not saying what was on your mind!! Or at least making some kind of remark about KC and her "boys"!! I admire your self control!!
You're so right. I don't think I could contain myself.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:
  #435  
Old 07-09-2010, 05:35 PM
RR0004's Avatar
RR0004 RR0004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by joypath View Post
Okay, I CAN'T let this post go unanswered on so many levels.
Cindy Anthony's experience as WHAT...the wife of a member of LE? Speaking as one such creature (mine is retired State homicide, highly decorated), extrapolating FACTS aka "Anthony mistruths" to "only apply pressure to get them to respond" to ANY division of LE is dancing on the edge of, if not falling into, illegal behavior, providing a false police report or as ICA is well aware, lying to LEO! Guess she never helped him study for promotional exams, you DO learn so much!
Now, if you're talking about CA's wifely experience vs actions toward HER husband, the "only apply pressure to get them to respond" just MIGHT be the only tool in her toolshed but not a universal axiom!
IF she makes the inane statement UNDER OATH that she was using the odor of a corpse to emphasize a need to Code 3, there will be some explaining to follow that better sound more rational than "hurry because I smell icky stuff" vs "hey you guys & gals with families and committed by oath to protect and serve, there's a missing, possibly kidnapped innocent almost 3 year old child in imminent danger"
Heck NO! Just 'cause CA says something, that isn't the end of it!

The jury should find CA very believable as a very upset, spontaneous utterer of the truth during that 911 call and may sit with mouths collectively catching flies as CA attempts to modify her extemporaneous 911 call with semi-scripted courtroom banter.
Brilliant...simply brilliant!
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:
  #436  
Old 07-09-2010, 05:46 PM
RR0004's Avatar
RR0004 RR0004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by notthatsmart View Post
I think Ca is going to speak from experience. Her husband is former Le and when they are not responding, you need only apply pressure to get them to respond. IMO She is prolly going to say she said it to get them to respond and that is going to be the end of it. IMO The Judge will prolly rule for the state just the same and let the Jury listen to Ca's testimony. IMO The Judge will prolly let the jury decide whether Ca is being truthful or not. IMO Easy out for a Judge, but a huge responsibility for the state. IMO The jury may find Ca believable. IMO
Except in the third call...if I'm not mistaken...doesn't she say someone is there before the dead body comment? I'll have to go back and take another listen.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:
  #437  
Old 07-09-2010, 05:57 PM
RR0004's Avatar
RR0004 RR0004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amil View Post
I am frequently close enough to say something to her at the hearings. I would like to say a few words that hit home, but have no idea what to say. Something to which there would be no reply. Not argumentative, just something true.Like "poor little Caylee".
"I'm here for Caylee."
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:
  #438  
Old 07-09-2010, 06:02 PM
The World According The World According is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by RR0004 View Post
"I'm here for Caylee."
Perfect.

Last edited by The World According; 07-10-2010 at 01:36 AM.
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to The World According For This Useful Post:
  #439  
Old 07-09-2010, 06:04 PM
The World According The World According is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,719
Joypath, thank you for being here. I thoroughly enjoy your input.
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to The World According For This Useful Post:
  #440  
Old 07-09-2010, 06:04 PM
RainyGirl RainyGirl is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The beautiful PacNW's Emerald City
Posts: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by joypath View Post
Okay, I CAN'T let this post go unanswered on so many levels.
Cindy Anthony's experience as WHAT...the wife of a member of LE? Speaking as one such creature (mine is retired State homicide, highly decorated), extrapolating FACTS aka "Anthony mistruths" to "only apply pressure to get them to respond" to ANY division of LE is dancing on the edge of, if not falling into, illegal behavior, providing a false police report or as ICA is well aware, lying to LEO! Guess she never helped him study for promotional exams, you DO learn so much!
Now, if you're talking about CA's wifely experience vs actions toward HER husband, the "only apply pressure to get them to respond" just MIGHT be the only tool in her toolshed but not a universal axiom!
IF she makes the inane statement UNDER OATH that she was using the odor of a corpse to emphasize a need to Code 3, there will be some explaining to follow that better sound more rational than "hurry because I smell icky stuff" vs "hey you guys & gals with families and committed by oath to protect and serve, there's a missing, possibly kidnapped innocent almost 3 year old child in imminent danger"
Heck NO! Just 'cause CA says something, that isn't the end of it!

The jury should find CA very believable as a very upset, spontaneous utterer of the truth during that 911 call and may sit with mouths collectively catching flies as CA attempts to modify her extemporaneous 911 call with semi-scripted courtroom banter.
(((bump)))

I hope EVERYONE reads this!
Respectfully, NTS---this includes you, too.
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to RainyGirl For This Useful Post:
  #441  
Old 07-09-2010, 06:05 PM
LolaMoon08's Avatar
LolaMoon08 LolaMoon08 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by The World According View Post
Perfect. All of you should wear your own t-shirts that say just exactly that in court.
That is a wonderful idea.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to LolaMoon08 For This Useful Post:
  #442  
Old 07-09-2010, 06:18 PM
miss plum miss plum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 932
'Justice for Caylee, not just ice.'
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to miss plum For This Useful Post:
  #443  
Old 07-09-2010, 06:35 PM
LolaMoon08's Avatar
LolaMoon08 LolaMoon08 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by miss plum View Post
'Justice for Caylee, not just ice.'
How about "Justice for Caylee Marie: no mis-truths or half-truths included."
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to LolaMoon08 For This Useful Post:
  #444  
Old 07-09-2010, 06:50 PM
Frigga's Avatar
Frigga Frigga is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 2,399
Let me add to that LolaMoon... I'm here for Justice for Caylee and nothing but the truth, the WHOLE truth, no mistruths or halftruths will do- the whole truth- so help me God!!!!!
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Frigga For This Useful Post:
  #445  
Old 07-09-2010, 07:25 PM
Macushla's Avatar
Macushla Macushla is offline
Our Royal Himalayan Gopher Hounds
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orlando, FL area
Posts: 2,433
A clarification if you please. I know Cindy being subpoenaed to testify on the 15th in regards to the 911 calls. But isn't this hearing also supposed to deal with the motions regarding TES and the searchers? I admit to being confused at this point about whether this hearing is going to cover both issues or is now just going to be about the 911 calls.
__________________
Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.
Euripides
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Macushla For This Useful Post:
  #446  
Old 07-09-2010, 08:03 PM
beach's Avatar
beach beach is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
Posts: 13,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macushla View Post
A clarification if you please. I know Cindy being subpoenaed to testify on the 15th in regards to the 911 calls. But isn't this hearing also supposed to deal with the motions regarding TES and the searchers? I admit to being confused at this point about whether this hearing is going to cover both issues or is now just going to be about the 911 calls.

The hearing is set to cover both the admissibility of the 911 calls AND the motion to reconsider the TES ruling previously denied by Judge Strickland.
__________________
Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to beach For This Useful Post:
  #447  
Old 07-09-2010, 08:10 PM
Omachka's Avatar
Omachka Omachka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macushla View Post
A clarification if you please. I know Cindy being subpoenaed to testify on the 15th in regards to the 911 calls. But isn't this hearing also supposed to deal with the motions regarding TES and the searchers? I admit to being confused at this point about whether this hearing is going to cover both issues or is now just going to be about the 911 calls.
I could have totally misunderstood (happens way more than I like to admit) but I thought since Judge Perry took over they were going to have periodic hearings to cover any and all motions that came up since the last one. So, since both those motions came up since the last motion hearing, then they are both up on the 15th. If I'm wrong on that could someone please straighten me out? I hate being cornfused.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Omachka For This Useful Post:
  #448  
Old 07-09-2010, 08:26 PM
beach's Avatar
beach beach is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
Posts: 13,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omachka View Post
I could have totally misunderstood (happens way more than I like to admit) but I thought since Judge Perry took over they were going to have periodic hearings to cover any and all motions that came up since the last one. So, since both those motions came up since the last motion hearing, then they are both up on the 15th. If I'm wrong on that could someone please straighten me out? I hate being cornfused.
July 15th was originally set to hear the TES motions. Later, the admissibility of the 911 calls was added to be heard on the 15th.

I would need to go review the exact times/dates when HHJP ordered these, but I post the entries on the calendar and I recall having to edit to add the admissibility of the 911 calls motion.


btw..an FYI - I have linked the calendar in my sig line for anyone who wants to check hearing dates/times and subject matter.
__________________
Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to beach For This Useful Post:
  #449  
Old 07-09-2010, 08:56 PM
ZsaZsa ZsaZsa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by RR0004 View Post
Except in the third call...if I'm not mistaken...doesn't she say someone is there before the dead body comment? I'll have to go back and take another listen.
No, the dispatcher is still talking to KC when someone says 'The officers are here'. CA reports the bad smell before they ever talk to a reluctant KC.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ZsaZsa For This Useful Post:
  #450  
Old 07-09-2010, 09:04 PM
beach's Avatar
beach beach is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
Posts: 13,652
This is what I have found so far -

Originally, TES was included in the defense's motion to reconsider the other prior rulings previously denied by Judge Strickland. However, Mark NeJame filed a Notice of Conflict. That motion was reset to be heard on July 15th, but I cannot find a link to the Order.

The defense filed a Reply to the SA's Response in re. the Admissibility of the 911 calls on 6/22. This all came up during the 6/21 status hearing and Cheney Mason spoke to the press after that hearing in re. the admissibility of the 911 calls. Anyway, IIRC, both the SA & defense agreed to add it to the motions hearing already scheduled for July 15th. Sorry, but I can't find a link to that Order either. I do recall HHJP ordering it that day (6/21) in open court, though.
__________________
Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.

Last edited by beach; 07-09-2010 at 09:12 PM.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to beach For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
cindy anthony subpoenaed, cindy has to testify, july 15th hearing, lee anthony subpoenaed, lee has to testify

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2009.07.24 Hearing 1:30pm: George and Cindy Anthony MAY be back in court salvarenga Caylee Anthony 2 years old 8 07-24-2009 10:04 AM
Do You think Cindy Anthony is mad at GA?.... usabound Caylee Anthony 2 years old 216 01-26-2009 08:37 PM
Videotaped Interview Of Cindy Anthony lorita jones Caylee Anthony 2 years old 108 09-26-2008 09:42 AM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!