Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Crimes and Trials > Currently Awaiting Trial

Notices

Currently Awaiting Trial Where the suspects are in jail, awaiting the start of the trial


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:35 PM
Lynn R Lynn R is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 80
[quote=Missjones;6081969]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luna15 View Post
To be fair, if he is innocent, he should be pleading as such, now matter what evidence the police allege to have.
FAO: Otto Yes I agree but it appears he isnt allowed to until 4th May ( for the grace of God go I) you have to wait 4 months
]

Do we know if this is the case? I was surmising in my post.
  #27  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:43 PM
whitedove's Avatar
whitedove whitedove is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wales UK.
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillb View Post
Here's a bit of help regarding posting images to forums.

http://www.ibdguy.com/posting.shtml

You need to host your images onto a photo hosting website like flickr, photobucket, or Image Shack. They generate an image IMG code you embed in this comment section.
Lots of different ways to do it really. Forum tags if you use Firefox for example.

It looks a bit confusing at first, but is easy enough with a bit of practice.
I have posted pics on here, it lets you move them into position with the writing, but when its posted, its on the next page, I ve never seen a picture on this front page on this forum, but video's will post on here, maybe you can try and post a pic, if I know it can be done, I will have another go.
  #28  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:47 PM
Luna15's Avatar
Luna15 Luna15 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 545
Front page of The Sun tomorrow

Jo's dad: We feel so sorry for McCanns.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...uary_1%2C_2011

__________________
Not to help justice in her need would be an impiety ~Plato~
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Luna15 For This Useful Post:
  #29  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:49 PM
enzeder's Avatar
enzeder enzeder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luna15 View Post
Front page of The Sun tomorrow

Jo's dad: We feel so sorry for McCanns.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...uary_1%2C_2011

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to enzeder For This Useful Post:
  #30  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:50 PM
Luna15's Avatar
Luna15 Luna15 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 545
[quote=Lynn R;6081977]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missjones View Post


Do we know if this is the case? I was surmising in my post.
We can only surmise from what the family have said, and this is a good indication I think (if true of course)

On Monday, staff and students at Eindhoven Technical University, where Mr Tabak studied architectural engineering, announced the creation of a fighting fund to aid his defence.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...Christmas.html
__________________
Not to help justice in her need would be an impiety ~Plato~
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Luna15 For This Useful Post:
  #31  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:51 PM
Luna15's Avatar
Luna15 Luna15 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by enzeder View Post
__________________
Not to help justice in her need would be an impiety ~Plato~
  #32  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:54 PM
Lynn R Lynn R is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 80
[quote=Luna15;6082063]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn R View Post

We can only surmise from what the family have said, and this is a good indication I think (if true of course)

On Monday, staff and students at Eindhoven Technical University, where Mr Tabak studied architectural engineering, announced the creation of a fighting fund to aid his defence.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...Christmas.html
Ah sorry I was referring to the point where the defence 'have' to wait a certain amount of time before entering a plea
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn R For This Useful Post:
  #33  
Old 01-31-2011, 06:57 PM
goldielox goldielox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missjones View Post
If VT doesnt know the exact evidence against him how can he plead innocent of guilty,
99.9% sure he'll plead not guilty. I'll use a theoretical scenario to give an indication of why.

Joe Bloggs is arrested and charged with rape.

The police's case against him is that, armed with a gun, he went to Jane Doe's home one night intent on raping her, and knowing her partner was away that weekend.

Joe Bloggs version of events is that yes he did have a gun. It was in his pocket and fell out as he was leaving the house. He went to the house to see Jane's partner not Jane, not knowing Jane would even be at the house that night. Finding Jane alone on the spur of the moment he committed the offence.


To plea "guilty" means, whether everything is true or not in the police's version, he is pleading guilty to the police's version of events. All of it. Whilst he may get a reduction in sentence for the guilty plea there are aggravating features about the offence (gun, pre-planned, offence occured in her own home etc) that would likely cancel out that reduction and could in fact mean he gets a bigger sentence.

By going "not guilty" instead his defence can test the evidence in court. It could then be that it is shown to be false that he used the gun to threaten Jane, that he did really go there on the spur of the moment and really had been trying to find Jane's partner. He's still in the ***** conviction and sentence wise but with less aggravating features now to be taken into consideration his sentence could be no worse than it would be for the guilty plea...and of course there's always the chance he gets off with it completely and is acquitted or gets off on a technicality.


For murder the maximum reduction in sentence for a guilty plea is five years, or one sixth of the original sentence that would have been imposed. If there are any aggravating features to be taken into consideration (planning in advance, abduction/concealing of the body, sexual motive ..to name a few) the sentence would be more severe and likely to cancel out any reduction for a guilty plea anyway, so there is very little incentive to plead "guilty" and rarely does it happen in murder cases.
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to goldielox For This Useful Post:
  #34  
Old 01-31-2011, 07:19 PM
Missjones Missjones is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldielox View Post
99.9% sure he'll plead not guilty. I'll use a theoretical scenario to give an indication of why.

Joe Bloggs is arrested and charged with rape.

The police's case against him is that, armed with a gun, he went to Jane Doe's home one night intent on raping her, and knowing her partner was away that weekend.

Joe Bloggs version of events is that yes he did have a gun. It was in his pocket and fell out as he was leaving the house. He went to the house to see Jane's partner not Jane, not knowing Jane would even be at the house that night. Finding Jane alone on the spur of the moment he committed the offence.


To plea "guilty" means, whether everything is true or not in the police's version, he is pleading guilty to the police's version of events. All of it. Whilst he may get a reduction in sentence for the guilty plea there are aggravating features about the offence (gun, pre-planned, offence occured in her own home etc) that would likely cancel out that reduction and could in fact mean he gets a bigger sentence.

By going "not guilty" instead his defence can test the evidence in court. It could then be that it is shown to be false that he used the gun to threaten Jane, that he did really go there on the spur of the moment and really had been trying to find Jane's partner. He's still in the ***** conviction and sentence wise but with less aggravating features now to be taken into consideration his sentence could be no worse than it would be for the guilty plea...and of course there's always the chance he gets off with it completely and is acquitted or gets off on a technicality.


For murder the maximum reduction in sentence for a guilty plea is five years, or one sixth of the original sentence that would have been imposed. If there are any aggravating features to be taken into consideration (planning in advance, abduction/concealing of the body, sexual motive ..to name a few) the sentence would be more severe and likely to cancel out any reduction for a guilty plea anyway, so there is very little incentive to plead "guilty" and rarely does it happen in murder cases.
I get the scenario, but in VTs case we have no motive, he is not a rapist has a good clean record in Holland as well as in the UK, worked hard to get the PHd and good job, got a new life with lovely GF spending Christmas with her parents from 24 till 26 Dec then goes home to his family in Holland till 2 Jan, goes back to work, why kill JY, why throw it all away, his family are so shocked and love him too . I cant think of another murdered who didnt have something in their background to make them a killer if not at the least some motive
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Missjones For This Useful Post:
  #35  
Old 01-31-2011, 07:20 PM
Cherwell Cherwell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn R View Post
Not sure if this has been highlighted already:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/2011/01...5875-22838073/
'But it yesterday emerged pictures from Clifton Suspension Bridge’s CCTV – one of the best hopes of a breakthrough in Jo Yeates’ murder hunt – could be too dim to show her killer or their car registration.

The tourist attraction provides the most direct route from the 25-year-old’s flat to the roadside verge three miles away where her body was dumped.

According to toll-keepers though, the bridge’s shoddy pictures will not identify the strangler’s face because the landmark’s 3,000 LED lights cause a glare which greatly reduces CCTV quality.

They will also be unlikely to pick out registration plates of every motorist. It will be a huge blow to desperate detectives hoping for their first major development in the hunt for Jo’s murderer.'
Yes, this is an old report and what it did not make clear was that the lights on the bridge are turned off at midnight. So any film taken after that time would be unaffected, and therefore perfectly usable. More shoddy journalism
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cherwell For This Useful Post:
  #36  
Old 01-31-2011, 07:23 PM
Lynn R Lynn R is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missjones View Post
I get the scenario, but in VTs case we have no motive, he is not a rapist has a good clean record in Holland as well as in the UK, worked hard to get the PHd and good job, got a new life with lovely GF spending Christmas with her parents from 24 till 26 Dec then goes home to his family in Holland till 2 Jan, goes back to work, why kill JY, why throw it all away, his family are so shocked and love him too . I cant think of another murdered who didnt have something in their background to make them a killer if not at the least some motive

I think Goldielox was trying to show an example. But I totally agree with you
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn R For This Useful Post:
  #37  
Old 01-31-2011, 07:27 PM
Cherwell Cherwell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn R View Post
BTW I wonder why he appeared via video link. Is this the new way to save money etc? is it optional or would there have been some other reason?
Probably to avoid the scrummage of photographers outside the courts.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cherwell For This Useful Post:
  #38  
Old 01-31-2011, 07:31 PM
Lynn R Lynn R is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherwell View Post
Probably to avoid the scrummage of photographers outside the courts.
Yes I imagine that would be very traumatic. So it's optional then.
  #39  
Old 01-31-2011, 07:54 PM
Cherwell Cherwell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,470
I don't think we can assume it's optional. It is probably to reduce the disturbance and inconvenience for all concerned, rather than just for the benefit of the defendant.
The Following User Says Thank You to Cherwell For This Useful Post:
  #40  
Old 01-31-2011, 07:57 PM
otto otto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,247
Some general comments ... after catching up on the thread.

I read in the links from this morning that VT has "legal aid". I'm guessing this means that he has very little savings. If he were to apply for bail, he would need to put something up. Is it possible that he has nothing pay for bail and therefore hasn't requested it?

It does sound like the prosecution has until the beginning of April to spell out the case against him, and then the defence has until the beginning of May to respond. Is that like the prosecution "disclosure"?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to otto For This Useful Post:
  #41  
Old 01-31-2011, 08:22 PM
otto otto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luna15 View Post
To be fair, if he is innocent, he should be pleading as such, now matter what evidence the police allege to have.

FAO: Otto

When you have a minute, can you just clarify what VT's brother said about VT being in the States for work? from what I can gather, he was in the States for 6 weeks? JY & GR had only been in the flat a couple of months, so I am guessing he only would have been around them for a couple of weeks before Dec 17th? TYIA.

I do wonder at times it could have been a case of mistaken identity? was VT's GF the target?
I watched a bit of it again. At 4:01 minutes (approx) the brother discusses VT being away for work. He says that the flat that Joanna and GR were in was empty for a few months, and then Joanna and GR were there for only a couple of months, and in the same time VT was in the US working ... so there wasn't much opportunity for them to have contact.

I suppose this suggests that if VT did murder Joanna, then it would be a random, stranger attack.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to otto For This Useful Post:
  #42  
Old 01-31-2011, 09:04 PM
enzeder's Avatar
enzeder enzeder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by otto View Post
Some general comments ... after catching up on the thread.

I read in the links from this morning that VT has "legal aid". I'm guessing this means that he has very little savings. If he were to apply for bail, he would need to put something up. Is it possible that he has nothing pay for bail and therefore hasn't requested it?

It does sound like the prosecution has until the beginning of April to spell out the case against him, and then the defence has until the beginning of May to respond. Is that like the prosecution "disclosure"?
BBM

I'd like to know the answer to that as well.

I posted these links a thread or two ago regarding the plea and case management hearing but I'll post them again.

PLEA AND CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING (PCMH)
http://www.needasolicitor.com/61/Leg...RING-PCMH.html

Plea and Case Management Hearing - Advocates Questionnaire
http://www.justice.gov.uk/annex-e-pcmh-april-2010.pdf

Quote:
Monday, January 31st, 2011

"Nigel Lickley (corr), prosecuting for the CPS, then informed the judge of the current timetable for the Crown’s case.

He said: ”The timetable we propose is this. That the Crown will intend to serve the case papers on or before April 1.

”The defence case statement on or before April 28 and to have a plea and case management hearing in this court on May 4."

http://swns.com/jo-yeates-murder-vin...te-311205.html
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to enzeder For This Useful Post:
  #43  
Old 02-01-2011, 02:19 AM
veggiefan veggiefan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luna15 View Post
To be fair, if he is innocent, he should be pleading as such, now matter what evidence the police allege to have.
There isn't really an opportunity to plead not guilty at a Preliminary Hearing, although he could have entered a guilty plea yesterday. Indeed, had he done so there is even provision for him to have been sentenced on the spot, although for a crime this serious the judge would almost certainly have delayed sentencing until psychological reports become available. See:

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/c...ocedure_rules/

"If the Defendant intends to plead guilty, the magistrates' court should make appropriate orders so that he can be sentenced at the Preliminary Hearing if possible."

See also www.justice.gov.uk/anx_e2page1-4.pdf in which it is asked if the defendant has been advised about credit for pleading guilty, and if it is likely that the case can be concluded at the Preliminary Hearing by the defendant pleading guilty?

Yesterday's Preliminary Hearing took only 15 minutes, but an hour had been allocated, in case of this eventuality.

Not entering a plea yesterday strongly suggests that VT intends to contest the case, but it leaves open the possibility of a guilty plea in May, once the weight of evidence has been put to him.

In short, there isn't really a mechanism or reason to plea not guilty at a Preliminary Hearing. Just an opportunity to plead guilty and thus save the ordeal of a trial by jury.

Hope that makes sense!
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to veggiefan For This Useful Post:
  #44  
Old 02-01-2011, 03:00 AM
SheDevil SheDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luna15 View Post
Front page of The Sun tomorrow

Jo's dad: We feel so sorry for McCanns.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...uary_1%2C_2011

I think its about time David Yeates stopped giving soundbites to the press.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SheDevil For This Useful Post:
  #45  
Old 02-01-2011, 03:50 AM
notsure notsure is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Somerset
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missjones View Post
I get the scenario, but in VTs case we have no motive, he is not a rapist has a good clean record in Holland as well as in the UK, worked hard to get the PHd and good job, got a new life with lovely GF spending Christmas with her parents from 24 till 26 Dec then goes home to his family in Holland till 2 Jan, goes back to work, why kill JY, why throw it all away, his family are so shocked and love him too . I cant think of another murdered who didnt have something in their background to make them a killer if not at the least some motive
I suppose you mean no known motive. We cannot see inside his mind, and that is where motives may be hidden. The fact that he has a PhD is irrelevant. We don't know that there is nothing in his background either. Perhaps we will find out at some point.
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to notsure For This Useful Post:
  #46  
Old 02-01-2011, 03:56 AM
Patticake Patticake is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 700
Tabak Family Summit

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...ly-summit.html

Not sure if this was in Marcel's video ... but Vincent called a family summit [minus the children] when he was visiting at Christmas to tell them he was "under suspicion.

So his family could not have been completely surprised when he was arrested.

.
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Patticake For This Useful Post:
  #47  
Old 02-01-2011, 04:41 AM
whiterum whiterum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 975
Quote:
Originally Posted by notsure View Post
I suppose you mean no known motive. We cannot see inside his mind, and that is where motives may be hidden. The fact that he has a PhD is irrelevant. We don't know that there is nothing in his background either. Perhaps we will find out at some point.
Exactly, there are people who have some underlying psychological problem yet outwardly show no signs. Also there are people who are guilty of a one off compulsive act, maybe triggered by lust, envy, drink, drugs whatever.

As you say we cannot see inside the mind.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to whiterum For This Useful Post:
  #48  
Old 02-01-2011, 04:42 AM
Myserty64 Myserty64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 623
Well, I'm just going to wait for the trial.

I have to say October seems a thousand years away. I wonder what it seems like for VT?
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Myserty64 For This Useful Post:
  #49  
Old 02-01-2011, 04:55 AM
veggiefan veggiefan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patticake View Post
Not sure if this was in Marcel's video ... but Vincent called a family summit [minus the children] when he was visiting at Christmas to tell them he was "under suspicion.
"Under suspicion" seems an odd phrase to use, if it has been reported accurately. If my neighbour had been murdered and the police had asked to search my house, I'd be curious to know why, but I wouldn't assume that I was "under suspicion" (unless I'd done it, of course).
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to veggiefan For This Useful Post:
  #50  
Old 02-01-2011, 05:16 AM
whiterum whiterum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myserty64 View Post
Well, I'm just going to wait for the trial.

I have to say October seems a thousand years away. I wonder what it seems like for VT?
It would be a complete nightmare if he was innocent. Personally, I would have to be dragged into court sceaming my innocence to everyone in the vicinity. I would not care at all about the consequences, even the Judiciary would get an ear bashing, or worse if they said anything to the contrary.
I swear, I would have to be ankle chained or I would be out of there at the first opportunity


Last edited by whiterum; 02-01-2011 at 05:28 AM.
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to whiterum For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
+ joanna yeates, 37 aberdeen road, 44 canynge road, beast719, bristol, bristol crown court, chris jefferies, clean rap sheet, clifton, dci phil jones, failand, greg reardon, hmp long lartin, longwood lane, michael fitton qc, panda - 4x4?, pathologist dr nat cary, police bail, red jumper redux, vincent tabak

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Found Deceased UK - Joanna Yeates Clifton, Bristol, 17 December 2010 - #11 Salem Currently Awaiting Trial 643 01-31-2011 02:36 PM
UK - Joanna Yeates Clifton, Bristol, 17 December 2010 - #10 Texas Mist Currently Awaiting Trial 637 01-24-2011 04:54 PM
UK - Joanna Yeates, Clifton, Bristol, 17 December 2010 - #8 Cubby Currently Awaiting Trial 510 01-21-2011 05:27 PM
UK - Joanna Yeates, Clifton, Bristol, 17 December 2010 - #5 wfgodot Currently Awaiting Trial 720 01-15-2011 06:01 PM
UK - Joanna Yeates, Clifton, Bristol, 17 December 2010 - #4 wfgodot Currently Awaiting Trial 493 01-12-2011 07:08 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!