The Wine Cellar

[MurriFlower]

Originally Posted by joeskidbeck

No, Murri. Patsy (and John) said the latch did NOT automatically fall into the 6 o'clock position, it had to be turned in order to lock.

They said nothing of the kind.

"TT: Okay. But it doesn’t the door won’t open up because of the carpet without that lock down. If you leave the lock in the up position the door doesn’t just swing (inaudible).
PR: No."

"he saw a door to what the Ramseys called the wine cellar. He turned the closed wooden latch and opened the door. The room was pitch-black, he said. He didn’t enter, and he saw nothing. When he couldn’t find a light switch, he closed the door and went back upstairs. He did not remember whether or not he relatched the door."

Unless FW had pushed the latch into the 'up position', he would have had to swing the latch across to open and then to close the door and by doing so, would have re-latched the door.

[Toltec]

Nice one Murri...you walked right into that one.

[SunnieRN]

Originally Posted by MurriFlower

Asked and answered. No, you cannot lock yourself in.

I think this is called doublespeak MF.

[UKGuy]

Originally Posted by cynic

In 1997, PR says the always latched the cellar door, but a year later Ramnesia sets in and says she “would not have specifically necessarily locked it.”
Specifically, necessarily??????

Ah yes, but the ever so courteous intruder/pedophile/kidnapper/murderer took the time out of his busy schedule to latch it?
(Also, the small pivoting peg is not readily obvious, nor would it by likely that someone would expect something that archaic as a means of securing a door.)




TT: Okay. Um, that, that cellar door, that peg on that, does that have to be down to deep that door closed?
PR: Uh, well, no it will close. It, you know, it kind of sort of sticks on the carpet a little bit.
TT: Um hum.
PR: I mean, it will close, but that kind of I always kind of flipped that down just so the kids wouldn’t get in there.
TT: Okay. But it doesn’t the door won’t open up because of the carpet without that lock down. If you leave the lock in the up position the door doesn’t just swing (inaudible).
PR: No.
TT: Okay. Were you ever, you were not ever in the basement that morning before the police got there?
PR: No, I was not.
Patsy Ramsey, 1997 Interview

PATSY RAMSEY: Okay. This is back, this is what we referred to as the (inaudible) cover, these are (inaudible) painting here. When were these pictures taken, before we found JonBenet?
TRIP DEMUTH: Yes.
PATSY RAMSEY: See that door is locked there, because there is a little tab thing on there.
TOM HANEY: Is that the way it is normally secured with that, is it a block of wood?
PATSY RAMSEY: Uh-huh.
TOM HANEY: And how firmly or loosely is that attached?
PATSY RAMSEY: You mean the wood?
TOM HANEY: Yes, the wood, the block.
PATSY RAMSEY: Well, you know, it bends, you know. I mean, you have to turn it.
TOM HANEY: You have to actually apply some force?
PATSY RAMSEY: Right.
TOM HANEY: Would it be capable of falling down on its own?
PATSY RAMSEY: No, I don't know, and I wasn't always -- you know, I was hiding some Christmas presents and stuff back in there for Christmas.
TOM HANEY: Okay. Do you recall –
PATSY RAMSEY: What I was going to say, I mean, after bringing the stuff up out of there after Christmas, I would not have specifically necessarily locked it because it kind of drags on the carpet.
TOM HANEY: All right.
PATSY RAMSEY: So I can't say that I personally left it neat and tidy shut and closed after I had gotten all of the toys out of there.
TOM HANEY: You said it kind of drags on the bottom of the carpet. The carpet is too high or the door is too low. How tough is it to open, I mean is it –
PATSY RAMSEY: You can do it. I can do it, but you had some resistance.
TOM HANEY: Okay. Is there a spot where you couldn't open past that?
PATSY RAMSEY: No.
TOM HANEY: So if we refer to your 90 degrees to pull over, it would do that with just some effort?
PATSY RAMSEY: Yeah.
Patsy Ramsey, 1998 Interview

JOHN RAMSEY: Right. I remember grabbing the handle because the door was latched because I expected it not to be latched. I reached out, flipped the latch and opened the door and immediately looked down.
LOU SMIT: And you say immediately?
JOHN RAMSEY: There was a white blanket. And I just knew that I had found her.
LOU SMIT: How were you standing in the doorway when you observed that?
JOHN RAMSEY: I was probably right there. The door pulled open. The handle was on the left side of the door and it opened this way, as I recall.
LOU SMIT: So now, I just want to get that right because when you opened the door, you could look inside the room. Is the light on or off at the time you open the door?
JOHN RAMSEY: I think it was off. I don't remember it being on. It was off.
LOU SMIT: Would you be able to see into that room if the light was off?
JOHN RAMSEY: I saw clearly, instantly. Yeah.
…
MIKE KANE: Okay. Now when you went around to the wine cellar door, you said you pulled at it and, I think you said that you were surprised that it was latched?
JOHN RAMSEY: I just said I remember pulling on it almost popping out of hand because it's always been open. And I don't think the latch was latched.
MIKE KANE: I think you said, (I didn't expect it to be latched.̃ Was it normally not?
JOHN RAMSEY: I'd say, I mean, the door was kind of stuck anyway, so it wasn't common to latch it.
MIKE KANE: Did that latch, and I've seen pictures of it, it was on like a pivot?
JOHN RAMSEY: It was on a block of wood.
MIKE KANE: A block of wood, but it was pivoted?
JOHN RAMSEY: Right.
MIKE KANE: Was it enough that it would fall down on its own or did you have to physically turn it?
JOHN RAMSEY: I think you had to physically turn it.
John Ramsey, 1998 Interview

The sergeant found no evidence of forced entry during a walk through the house, then went outside. A light dusting of snow and frost lay atop an earlier crusty snow in spotty patches on the grass. He saw no fresh shoe impressions, found no open doors or windows, nothing to indicate a break-in, but walking on the driveway and sidewalks left no visible prints. It was frigid, about nine degrees, and Reichenbach returned inside.
He went down into the sprawling basement and walked through it. At the far end was a white door secured at the top by a block of wood that pivoted on a screw. Reichenbach tried to open the door, stopped when he felt resistance, then returned upstairs. Reichenbach, Officer French, and one of the friends Patsy had called, Fleet White, would all check that white door in the basement during the morning, and White would even open it. They found nothing.
JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, pages 19-20

Earlier, Rick French, the first police officer to respond to the mother’s 911 call, had immediately searched the house for the child and for any sign of forced entry, but he found nothing. Then he read the ransom note
Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, Lawrence Schiller, page 7

When Rick French, the first officer on the scene after Patsy’s report of a kidnapping, later saw the spot where the body had been found, he remembered his search of the house in the early morning. In the first minutes, French, seeing from where he stood that the door was latched shut, had thought there was no need to open it. Now he was baffled by his own decision. How hard would it have been to open the door? Had JonBenét still been alive when he stood just a few feet away and decided not to open the door? The thought devastated him.
Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, Lawrence Schiller, page 21

White told the detectives that he had been there only a few minutes when he started to search the house. Alone, he went down to the basement, found some of the lights on, and started calling out JonBenét’s name. It was so cluttered down there—with boxes stacked everywhere and shelves overflowing with odds and ends—that he could hardly see any open spaces where she might be. He started in Burke’s train and hobby room, where he saw a suitcase sitting under a broken window. On the floor under the window, he found small pieces of glass. He placed some of them on the windowsill. Then he moved the suitcase a few feet to get a closer look at the window. White said he was sure the window was closed but unlatched. After he left the train room, he turned right, into the boiler room. At the back of the room, he said, he saw a door to what the Ramseys called the wine cellar. He turned the closed wooden latch and opened the door. The room was pitch-black, he said. He didn’t enter, and he saw nothing. When he couldn’t find a light switch, he closed the door and went back upstairs. He did not remember whether or not he relatched the door. Later, when White saw John Fernie, he told him that a window downstairs had been punched open. The police wondered why White had not seen JonBenét’s body and later Ramsey had, since they both stood at the same spot after opening the door to the wine cellar.
Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, Lawrence Schiller, page 44

He then described going to the little cellar room on the subsequent trip downstairs with Fleet White, unlatching and opening the white door. He snapped his fingers and said, “It was instant, I mean, as soon as I opened the door I saw the white blanket. . . and I knew what was up.” She was on her back on the floor with the white blanket folded around her, her arms were tied, and there was a piece of black tape over her lips, he said, and her head was cocked to one side.
The door opens outward, so he would have had to step back or aside before moving through. He did not say he saw the blanket after turning on the light but “instantly.” Fleet White had stood in that same doorway that morning and could see nothing in the windowless darkness. I had always considered that Ramsey might have known something before he entered, and with this new admission of going to the basement earlier, I was sure of it. By the time he went back downstairs with Fleet White, I thought he knew exactly where the body was.
JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, pages 192-193

We conducted tedious re-creations in the small room where the body was found, duplicating lighting conditions with the help of a photographic expert with sensitive meters and placing a white cotton blanket where JonBenét had lain.
John Ramsey had said he spotted the blanket instantly when he opened the door. It was as dark as a coal mine at midnight in there, and to open the door, he would have had to step back to a point where a blind corner would have blocked his view. I stood where Ramsey had been and saw only a wall of impenetrable blackness.
Lou Smit: “I can see in there.”
Even with the light on, Detective Gosage said, “I had to step completely into the cellar and look around the corner to my left to see the blanket on the floor.”
JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, page 220

Ramsey stuck to his original story of seeing the girl’s body “clearly and instantly” when he opened the cellar door and for the first time said he did not turn on the light. Our tests and the testimony of Fleet White had convinced us that it was impossible to see anything in the darkness, particularly when the view was blocked by a jutting interior corner.
JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, page 361

(It does appear to be extremely dark in the room, especially when the door is partially open and someone is standing at the entrance as depicted in the fourth picture below.
The last picture shows that you do have to step inside and look down and to left to have any chance of seeing the body.)














CASKU further said that placing JonBenét in the basement was consistent with a parent not wanting to put the body outside in the winter elements. The familiarity with and relocking of the peg on the white cellar door were noted. The ligatures, they said, indicated staging rather than control, and the garrote was used from behind so the killer could avoid eye contact, typical of someone who cares for the victim.
JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, page 243

It was time to let Sergeant Wickman confront the Intruder Theory.

“The prominent red flag in the big picture is the utter illogic of such an intruder’s actions and behaviors,” Wickman said. “For one to believe an intruder committed this crime, one would also have to believe all of these things.” Enumerating conflicting points, Wickman asked, “Would an intruder”:

Have taken the time to close JonBenét’s bedroom door, which Patsy said had been found closed?

Have taken the time to relatch the obscure cellar door peg that police and Fleet White found in the locked position?

Have placed JonBenét beneath a blanket and taken the care to place her favorite pink nightgown with her?
...

Have wiped and/or re-dressed JonBenét after the assault and murder?

Have fed her pineapple, then kept her alive in the house for a couple of hours while she digested it? (That same fresh-cut pineapple that was consistent, right down to the rind, with a bowl on the breakfast table that had the print of Patsy Ramsey’s right middle finger on it.)
...

Have been able to navigate silently through a dark, confusing, and occupied house without a sound in the quiet of Christmas night?
...

Be a stranger who could write a note with characteristics so similar to those of Patsy Ramsey’s writing that numerous experts would be unable to eliminate her as the author?
...


Have been so unprepared for this most high-risk of crimes that the individuals representing a “small foreign faction” failed to bring the necessary equipment to facilitate the crime?

Have been able to murder the child in such a violent fashion but so quietly that her parents and brother slept through the event, despite a scream loud enough to be heard by a neighbor across the street?
...

And, Wickman pointed out, given the medical opinions of prior vaginal trauma, the night of the murder must not have been the intruder’s first visit, unless the vaginal abuse and the murder were done by different people.
JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, pages 346-347

cynic,
Nice layout of the pictures and text.

That Fleet White visited the wine-cellar and sensed nothing amiss e.g. no unusual smell, no obscure shape in the background, nothing out of place.

Has, I reckon, informed other sleuthers that JonBenet may not have been lying in the wine-cellar when he visited?

One aspect of his return to the wine-cellar after JonBenet was discovered, not commented upon, is could he have been wanting to make sure about what he could and could not see?

His return visit, in particular his motivation has always interested me, since I reckon he did not return exclusively to check out if the duct-tape was new or used.

LOU SMIT: So now, I just want to get that right because when you opened the door, you could look inside the room. Is the light on or off at the time you open the door?
JOHN RAMSEY: I think it was off. I don't remember it being on. It was off.
LOU SMIT: Would you be able to see into that room if the light was off?
JOHN RAMSEY: I saw clearly, instantly. Yeah.
…

No answer to the light off question, just reiteration.

Putting it bluntly I reckon Fleet White's thought process ran something like this: 'how come I missed her the first time round, I'm certain there was no body in that room. Yet John just opens the door, and presto, there is JonBenet!. I've got to go back and look again, even although I've been instructed not to do so'

Have placed JonBenét beneath a blanket and taken the care to place her favorite pink nightgown with her?

Now according to John, JonBenet was wrapped papoose style in the white blanket. I'm going to assume all the other items related to the crime-scene were also found inside the white blanket, and not simply lying strewn about the wine-cellar floor?

CASKU further said that placing JonBenét in the basement was consistent with a parent not wanting to put the body outside in the winter elements. The familiarity with and relocking of the peg on the white cellar door were noted. The ligatures, they said, indicated staging rather than control, and the garrote was used from behind so the killer could avoid eye contact, typical of someone who cares for the victim.
JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, Steve Thomas, page 243

Much of what CASKU says would make sense if the crime-scene was not staged. But why should the same person who whacked JonBenet then applied a ligature, along with some fake sexual assault, be so bothered about JonBenet's disposition?

I reckon there is a case for suggesting that JonBenet was placed into the wine-cellar later that morning. That JonBenet was wrapped papoose style in the white blanket suggests to me that someone simply scooped JonBenet up along with the crime-scene artifacts that were associated with her, bundled into the white blanket and placed in the wine-cellar, thus relocating a prior staging?


.

[cynic]

Originally Posted by MurriFlower

Yes, absolutely. If you just swing it to the 3 or 9 o'clock position to open the door, it will fall back to 6 o'clock and you have to move it again to close the door. If you push it up between the 11 and 2 o'clock position, it will stay put. That's how they work, so you can leave it unlatched if you wish or not. So it depends on where you push the block whether it stays upright or falls down.

This is not the way that this latch works.
If it automatically dropped down on its own, then why does PR say that force is required to turn it?
Why is Patsy trying to remember whether she “specifically, necessarily” locked it, if the process is automatic? (The same question applies to her previous statement that she “always” locked it.)
Similarly, why would John be surprised that the door would be latched in the locked position if it would automatically always be locked?
The wood was screwed in place and was tight; it required some effort to turn and clearly would not automatically drop down.
I shot a quick video to illustrate how this latch works, although I believe that the statements by the Ramseys are both plain and sufficient on their own.
In the video you will see that the wood remains in whatever position it is turned to.


At the far end was a white door secured at the top by a block of wood that pivoted on a screw. Reichenbach tried to open the door, stopped when he felt resistance, then returned upstairs.

PR: I mean, it will close, but that kind of I always kind of flipped that down just so the kids wouldn’t get in there.

TOM HANEY: And how firmly or loosely is that attached?
PATSY RAMSEY: You mean the wood?
TOM HANEY: Yes, the wood, the block.
PATSY RAMSEY: Well, you know, it bends, you know. I mean, you have to turn it.
TOM HANEY: You have to actually apply some force?
PATSY RAMSEY: Right.

PATSY RAMSEY: What I was going to say, I mean, after bringing the stuff up out of there after Christmas, I would not have specifically necessarily locked it because it kind of drags on the carpet.
TOM HANEY: All right.

JOHN RAMSEY: Right. I remember grabbing the handle because the door was latched because I expected it not to be latched. I reached out, flipped the latch and opened the door and immediately looked down.

MIKE KANE: Okay. Now when you went around to the wine cellar door, you said you pulled at it and, I think you said that you were surprised that it was latched?

YouTube

YouTube

[cynic]

Originally Posted by UKGuy

Has, I reckon, informed other sleuthers that JonBenet may not have been lying in the wine-cellar when he visited?

It was very dark in that room, it’s quite possible that FW simply didn’t see her. I don’t discount the possibility that JR may have moved her a bit closer to the door, thereby making his “instant” discovery more probable.

One aspect of his return to the wine-cellar after JonBenet was discovered, not commented upon, is could he have been wanting to make sure about what he could and could not see?
His return visit, in particular his motivation has always interested me, since I reckon he did not return exclusively to check out if the duct-tape was new or used.

Putting it bluntly I reckon Fleet White's thought process ran something like this: 'how come I missed her the first time round, I'm certain there was no body in that room. Yet John just opens the door, and presto, there is JonBenet!. I've got to go back and look again, even although I've been instructed not to do so

I agree, I think it would bother me greatly to know that I could have possibly found her with a bit more effort, especially the effort involved in finding a light switch.
I realize that you are saying that perhaps he didn’t see her because she wasn’t there, although FW himself cannot be certain of that given how dark the room was. IMO

Now according to John, JonBenet was wrapped papoose style in the white blanket. I'm going to assume all the other items related to the crime-scene were also found inside the white blanket, and not simply lying strewn about the wine-cellar floor?

If I had to guess, I would say inside the blanket or right beside her.

Much of what CASKU says would make sense if the crime-scene was not staged.

Personally, I believe the CASKU assessment because of the reasons that I outline below.

But why should the same person who whacked JonBenet then applied a ligature, along with some fake sexual assault, be so bothered about JonBenet's disposition?

Consider the possibility that all these elements should be not be grouped under the term “staging.”
The profiling/psychology term “undoing” readily explains “soft” and “caring” elements within a crime scene as I outlined in my thread on the subject:

The “Undoing” of the Ramseys. - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

The “Undoing” of the Ramseys. - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

I believe that the “papoose” style wrapping of the body was part of “undoing” as was the placement of her nightgown and doll.
The sexual assault, ligature and ransom note are the chief elements that would be best categorized as staging.

I reckon there is a case for suggesting that JonBenet was placed into the wine-cellar later that morning. That JonBenet was wrapped papoose style in the white blanket suggests to me that someone simply scooped JonBenet up along with the crime-scene artifacts that were associated with her, bundled into the white blanket and placed in the wine-cellar, thus relocating a prior staging?

Possibly, it is also possible that the blanket was placed on the wine cellar floor, her body placed on top and then tucked around her body.

[DeeDee249]

Cynic, that's what I think, too. I feel the white blanket taken out of the basement dryer and was put down on the WC floor. I see Patsy as the likely one to have done this, based on her forearm hair being found on the blanket. Then, her body placed on top of it, then folded up around her torso, arms, head and legs (probably from the calves down) exposed. We know her head was exposed, JR mentioned seeing he tape on her mouth and mentioned her head cocked to the right. FW mentioned touching her foot, which he described as ice-cold. Her arms have been a matter of confusion- they are depicted in a drawing (NOT made by someone who saw her) as being stretched out straight over her head. Yet, their position in a crime scene photo as she lay on the living room rug shows that they were actually bent at the elbow up in front of her face. I suppose that also fits Det. LA's description of "her arms were up over head with no support), which was how she observed the condition of JB's body as JR brought her up from the basement.

[UKGuy]

Originally Posted by cynic

It was very dark in that room, it’s quite possible that FW simply didn’t see her. I don’t discount the possibility that JR may have moved her a bit closer to the door, thereby making his “instant” discovery more probable.

I agree, I think it would bother me greatly to know that I could have possibly found her with a bit more effort, especially the effort involved in finding a light switch.
I realize that you are saying that perhaps he didn’t see her because she wasn’t there, although FW himself cannot be certain of that given how dark the room was. IMO
If I had to guess, I would say inside the blanket or right beside her.
Personally, I believe the CASKU assessment because of the reasons that I outline below.
Consider the possibility that all these elements should be not be grouped under the term “staging.”
The profiling/psychology term “undoing” readily explains “soft” and “caring” elements within a crime scene as I outlined in my thread on the subject:
The “Undoing” of the Ramseys. - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
I believe that the “papoose” style wrapping of the body was part of “undoing” as was the placement of her nightgown and doll.
The sexual assault, ligature and ransom note are the chief elements that would be best categorized as staging.
Possibly, it is also possible that the blanket was placed on the wine cellar floor, her body placed on top and then tucked around her body.

cynic,
The undoing elements may also simply be the result of pragmatic decisions made by a stager.

As outlined here:

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - If JonBenet's death was an accident...

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - If JonBenet's death was an accident...

A short summary is:

Someone else restaged aspects of Patsy's staging. This I contend is why JonBenet was discovered in the wine-cellar with a barbie-doll and bloodstained barbie nightgown, all wrapped in a white blanket. Someone else had started to restage the crime not completed it and had to simply wrap JonBenet, along with the prior artifacts, in the white blanket and place her out of sight in the wine-cellar!

Possibly, it is also possible that the blanket was placed on the wine cellar floor, her body placed on top and then tucked around her body.

Patently not something to be discounted, but would the blanket not then be coated extensively with dust from the floor?

If JonBenet was being dumped outdoors then the blanket as an undoing feature could be salient, but she was placed indoors in a relativley warm room.


.

[DeeDee249]

Originally Posted by UKGuy

cynic,
The undoing elements may also simply be the result of pragmatic decisions made by a stager.

As outlined here: Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - If JonBenet's death was an accident...
A short summary is:





Patently not something to be discounted, but would the blanket not then be coated extensively with dust from the floor?

If JonBenet was being dumped outdoors then the blanket as an undoing feature could be salient, but she was placed indoors in a relativley warm room.


.

Yes, that blanket should have had the dust/mould/debris from the WC floor on it, but that is really moot because we KNOW it was there. Had she not been really in there, FW would have known JR was lying about finding here there, because he was right behind JR entering the room. Where she was found is such a big part of the crime/staging, that had it not actually happened, I can't see FW corroborating that it did or not countering JR's claim.

[UKGuy]

Originally Posted by DeeDee249

Yes, that blanket should have had the dust/mould/debris from the WC floor on it, but that is really moot because we KNOW it was there. Had she not been really in there, FW would have known JR was lying about finding here there, because he was right behind JR entering the room. Where she was found is such a big part of the crime/staging, that had it not actually happened, I can't see FW corroborating that it did or not countering JR's claim.

DeeDee249,

It would be nice to know how confident FW is about his prior visit to the wine-cellar and his inability to see JonBenet, measured against John's instant perception!

Although the dust/mould/debris is likely a moot point as you suggest. If JonBenet had simply been placed into the wine-cellar, already wrapped in the blanket then there should only be minimal dust on a specific portion of the blanket. If the blanket had been laid out on the wine-cellar floor, then JonBenet placed into it, then it was rolled up. I reckon more dust should be distributed over the area of the blanket than if she had just been placed there.

.

[DeeDee249]

Originally Posted by UKGuy

DeeDee249,

It would be nice to know how confident FW is about his prior visit to the wine-cellar and his inability to see JonBenet, measured against John's instant perception!

Although the dust/mould/debris is likely a moot point as you suggest. If JonBenet had simply been placed into the wine-cellar, already wrapped in the blanket then there should only be minimal dust on a specific portion of the blanket. If the blanket had been laid out on the wine-cellar floor, then JonBenet placed into it, then it was rolled up. I reckon more dust should be distributed over the area of the blanket than if she had just been placed there.

.

I understand what you are saying, but it really doesn't change anything one way or the other. It doesn't matter whether the blanket was laid out flat and she was then placed in it and wrapped up, or if she was wrapped up elsewhere and then put in the WC. Bottom line- the blanket was IN there, and she was in the blanket. Knowing which came first doesn't really add anything to the solving of the case, as whoever committed the crime would have been privy to when and how the blanket was put in the WC. But, yes, you are correct in assuming there would be more dust on a larger portion of the blanket if it was opened out flat first.
Either way, we have a dead child in the basement of her own home. And photos of her bed indicate NO blanket was pulled off the bed (because the bedspread is intact on the foot portion of the bed and LE discussed this VERY thing with Patsy, who had to admit to them that the bed looks as if there NOT been a blanket on it between the sheets and bedspread.

[KariKae]

I am fairly new to the JBR case and this is the first time I have seen the photos of the wine cellar. If I were an intruder, I don't think I would open that door. IMO I would expect to find HVAC equipment or a water heater behind that door. It does not look like what I would consider a wine cellar.

[Toltec]

Fleet White claims he opens the wine cellar door AND feels around for a light switch....which should have given him a few seconds for his eyes to adjust to the darkness. If anything, he should have spotted the white blanket in those fleeting seconds he searched for a light switch.

[Agatha_C]

Originally Posted by Toltec

Fleet White claims he opens the wine cellar door AND feels around for a light switch....which should have given him a few seconds for his eyes to adjust to the darkness. If anything, he should have spotted the white blanket in those fleeting seconds he searched for a light switch.

What confuses me about FW and the wine cellar is his having been down there prior to the murder. He had gone down there during, I think the 23'd party to get more wine per PRs request. He knew where it was, he knew it had a lock and yet he didnt know where the light switch was. How is that wonders I? I am in no way saying FW killed JBR, I just wonder how he didnt know where the light switch was, when he had been down there prior and new everything else about the cellar. Either PR had left the door open and the light on or FW knows/saw more then he is admitting too. The more I think I understand, the more I realize I dont. Nothing makes sense.

[DeeDee249]

Originally Posted by KariKae

I am fairly new to the JBR case and this is the first time I have seen the photos of the wine cellar. If I were an intruder, I don't think I would open that door. IMO I would expect to find HVAC equipment or a water heater behind that door. It does not look like what I would consider a wine cellar.

I agree. An intruder wouldn't need to hide her body anyway. Just leave here where she was killed and get the He** outta there. And a kidnapper wouldn't leave her behind at all. Even dead, she'd be worth ransom.
So the only ones who would actually need to hide her would be the parents. Why do they need to hide her? Because they planned to say she was kidnapped. So she couldn't really be out in plain sight anywhere, even the basement.

[Agatha_C]

PMPT Page 498

"To the FBI profilers, the time spent staging the crime scene and hiding the body pointed to a killer who had asked, "How do I explain this?" and had answered the question: "A stranger did it." The staging suggested a killer desperate to divert attention.

Moreover, there was staging within staging: The loop of cord around one wrist was not a real indication that JonBenet had been restrained. The ligature that suffocated JonBenet-though she would eventually have died from the head injury-was in their opinion an unusual cover-up attempt, if that was what it was. The way the cord had been made into a noose-with the stick tied 17 inches from the knot-suggested staging rather than a bona fide attempt to strangle JonBenet. It suggested that the killer was a manipulative person, with the courage to believe that he or she could control the subsequent investigation. In short, everything about the crime indicated an attempt at self- preservation on the part of the killer."

[UKGuy]

Originally Posted by Agatha_C

What confuses me about FW and the wine cellar is his having been down there prior to the murder. He had gone down there during, I think the 23'd party to get more wine per PRs request. He knew where it was, he knew it had a lock and yet he didnt know where the light switch was. How is that wonders I? I am in no way saying FW killed JBR, I just wonder how he didnt know where the light switch was, when he had been down there prior and new everything else about the cellar. Either PR had left the door open and the light on or FW knows/saw more then he is admitting too. The more I think I understand, the more I realize I dont. Nothing makes sense.

Agatha_C,
I'm willing to bet FW knows a lot more than he is saying. Also why did he return to the wine-cellar for a second look? Its a crime-scene why do that?

I think FW genuinely thinks JonBenet was not in the wine-cellar the first time he looked.

He now knows there was staging involved and that a family member is the likely killer.

Without the artifacts accompanying JonBenet I would assume FW had simply made a mistake.

I reckon its possible someone else had relocated JonBenet into the wine-cellar and since it was John who led him back there, he becomes the prime suspect!

Also some artifacts discovered along with JonBenet were not sourced in the wine-cellar, and some may have been added to a prior staging thus making it difficult for us to decide where she was killed, where the staging took place etc.


.

[cynic]

Originally Posted by Agatha_C

What confuses me about FW and the wine cellar is his having been down there prior to the murder. He had gone down there during, I think the 23'd party to get more wine per PRs request. He knew where it was, he knew it had a lock and yet he didnt know where the light switch was. How is that wonders I? I am in no way saying FW killed JBR, I just wonder how he didnt know where the light switch was, when he had been down there prior and new everything else about the cellar. Either PR had left the door open and the light on or FW knows/saw more then he is admitting too. The more I think I understand, the more I realize I dont. Nothing makes sense.

AC, it’s difficult to tell from this combination of “fuzzy” questions and “fuzzy” answers:

TRIP DEMUTH: Patsy, I would like to know, the best of your memory, prior to this Christmas, who had gone in that wine cellar.
PATSY RAMSEY: Well, at Thanksgiving time I asked my cleaning lady, I had kept my big artificial trees in there, and I asked her to come and, you know, put those up while I was gone at Thanksgiving. So I don't know exactly who was with her to help her. She insinuated this is when they were going to also clean some of the windows, she and her husband. I think she also mentioned that her daughter had come to help her, Kristen, I think.
And they were there on Thanksgiving day, I know, because they (inaudible). They said they brought them something over for Thanksgiving to eat. So I would know that group, one or all of them, took the -- because the trees were up when I got back, so they had to have been in there to get them out of there.
TRIP DEMUTH: Okay.
PATSY RAMSEY: Okay. You know, it wasn't like a full-blown wine cellar, but we kept a couple boxes of wine in there. And I want to say that -- I don't remember whether it was the night of the 23rd, that party or some party we had, I remember somebody saying we are out of red wine. And I said please (inaudible) to or something. But at some time, please go to the basement to get some more red wine, but he would know where that was.
TOM HANEY: Okay.
PATSY RAMSEY: This guy named Bob Ballis (phonetic) who did some Christmas decorations, he made these things, you know, a year or more before when we had the Christmas open house. He would know about that.
TRIP DEMUTH: My question is: Who had been in that room prior to Christmas of '96, Bob Ballis, was he the Christmas of '95?
PATSY RAMSEY: Yeah. Right.
TRIP DEMUTH: Okay. In the months prior to Christmas of 1996 Fleet would have gone in there?
PATSY RAMSEY: I would say Fleet, the cleaning lady and –
TRIP DEMUTH: Maybe the husband?
PATSY RAMSEY: Maybe the husband and maybe the daughter.
TRIP DEMUTH: How about yourself?
PATSY RAMSEY: Me, taking hiding.
TRIP DEMUTH: Would the children go in there?
PATSY RAMSEY: No. If I had presents in there I would have locked it up.
TRIP DEMUTH: They couldn't reach that?
PATSY RAMSEY: No.
TRIP DEMUTH: Okay. Anyone else besides those people actually go into the wine cellar?
PATSY RAMSEY: Let me think. There were paint cans in there. I think Jay Pedify (phonetic)
would have been likely back there, but I don't remember when we had him, if he was there painting that fall or not.

It’s not clear when or if FW may have previously been in the room.
If he was in the room, he may have been there helping someone such as JR who obviously did know where the light switch was.
PR may also have been trying to throw FW under the bus.

Here is a more detailed account of the wine cellar encounter on Dec. 26:
A. There was a latch, as I recall, that was at the top of the door, and I unlatched it and then opened the -- opened the door and just looked in the room.
Q. Did you open the door completely to look in?
A. Wide enough to look in.
Q. And what did you see?
A. It was dark
Q. Totally dark?
A. As I recall, it was quite dark.
Q. Did any of the light in the hallway illuminate the area when you opened the door, to some extent?
A. Perhaps to some extent, but it was quite dark.
Q. It is my understanding you tried to find a light switch unsuccessfully?
A. Yes.
Q. Which side of the wall did you reach for? Left? Right? Describe for me the extent of your effort to locate a light switch in the wine cellar.
A. I believe I just reached in and felt the wall next to the door and didn't find one, so --
Q. Did you actually step into the room, though?
A. I may have put one -- I may have leaned in, placed one foot in.
Q. Would there be any reason why you would not have simply walked into the room, even though dark, to make an observation?
A. I don't -- I don't remember why I didn't walk in the room
Q. But you did not?
A. I did not walk in the room, other than to, perhaps, lean in or -- far enough to reach around and look for a switch.
Q. When you couldn't find a switch, what did you do?
A. I closed the door.
Q. Did you relatch it?
A. I believe I relatched it.
Q. Were you wearing gloves that morning?
A. No.
Q. Did you ever -- were you ever asked to give a palm print or fingerprints to the Boulder Police Department?
A. Yes.
Q. And you did so?
A. Yes.
Q. Do you recall when you were first asked to give fingerprints and palm prints?
A. Within a few days.
Q. Within a few days of the murder?
A. Yes.
Q. What did you do --
A. As I recall.
Q.-- after you closed the door to the wine cellar?
A. I went back upstairs.
Fleet White Deposition

[Tadpole12]

If the window screens had been placed against the wall, covering JBR's body, they would have provided additional camoflauge.
Even though her body was behind the door, she lay exposed?

[cynic]

Originally Posted by Toltec

Fleet White claims he opens the wine cellar door AND feels around for a light switch....which should have given him a few seconds for his eyes to adjust to the darkness. If anything, he should have spotted the white blanket in those fleeting seconds he searched for a light switch.

I do think that it was too dark to see much with a quick look, but I do wonder why more effort was not put forth.

By now the police had asked Vahe Christianian, the co-owner of Mike’s Camera in Boulder, to measure the ambient and reflected light inside the wine cellar with its door open and the lights out, to verify what could and could not be seen during a quick glance inside the room. The test showed that there was not enough light to see anything in the dark unless the viewer had spent time getting accustomed to the darkness or his eyes adapted quickly to the surroundings.
However, there was a possible explanation. JonBenét’s body was inside the room and to the left. It might not have been visible to White standing just at the threshold and blocking reflected light from entering the room. Yet if someone stood 5 to 10 inches inside the threshold, more reflected light would have entered. Then, looking directly to the left, the person might have seen the white blanket in the dark room. Maybe there was enough reflected light from just outside the door.
Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, Lawrence Schiller, pages 383-384

[cynic]

Originally Posted by UKGuy

If JonBenet was being dumped outdoors then the blanket as an undoing feature could be salient, but she was placed indoors in a relativley warm room.

Wrapping in an outdoor setting is a more dramatic example of undoing, however, a cold, mildewy, dirty floor is also something to “protect” a child against.

[DeeDee249]

Originally Posted by Tadpole12

If the window screens had been placed against the wall, covering JBR's body, they would have provided additional camoflauge.
Even though her body was behind the door, she lay exposed?

I know the screens you speak of, but I don't believe they were placed over JB's body at any time. I don't what the point of that would be. I believe she was put in the WC because the Rs claimed she was kidnapped- knew police would come to he house, but they didn't think police would actually do a search. After all they said she was kidnapped- presumed NOT to be in the house.
I feel what the Rs really planned to do was to wait till the police left, then at some point call them back and say she had been returned- dead- because they had called police.
See- to me- this is how some of those puzzle pieces fit. The ransom note- yet the body being found in the house. Why hide the body only to "find" her after police come.
But if their plan (after JB was fatally injured) was to claim she had been returned to them dead because they defied the note and called police that would seem (to them) that they could not be suspects, that no one could ever suspect they had done this because, after all- they were warned not to call anyone , yet they did, so OF COURSE, JB was killed.
BUT- when it became apparent that police were NOT going to leave that day, and that they themselves might have to leave (and leave JB behind in the WC while the process of death made finding her ever so much more horrific) JR was forced to do what he did- "find" her himself.
I think they couldn't just go away without finding her at that point. Though they were not experts on forensics, everyone knows what happens to a dead body as the hours (or days) pass. They couldn't let it go that long.

[Agatha_C]

Originally Posted by cynic

AC, it’s difficult to tell from this combination of “fuzzy” questions and “fuzzy” answers:

TRIP DEMUTH: Patsy, I would like to know, the best of your memory, prior to this Christmas, who had gone in that wine cellar.
PATSY RAMSEY: Well, at Thanksgiving time I asked my cleaning lady, I had kept my big artificial trees in there, and I asked her to come and, you know, put those up while I was gone at Thanksgiving. So I don't know exactly who was with her to help her. She insinuated this is when they were going to also clean some of the windows, she and her husband. I think she also mentioned that her daughter had come to help her, Kristen, I think.
And they were there on Thanksgiving day, I know, because they (inaudible). They said they brought them something over for Thanksgiving to eat. So I would know that group, one or all of them, took the -- because the trees were up when I got back, so they had to have been in there to get them out of there.
TRIP DEMUTH: Okay.
PATSY RAMSEY: Okay. You know, it wasn't like a full-blown wine cellar, but we kept a couple boxes of wine in there. And I want to say that -- I don't remember whether it was the night of the 23rd, that party or some party we had, I remember somebody saying we are out of red wine. And I said please (inaudible) to or something. But at some time, please go to the basement to get some more red wine, but he would know where that was.
TOM HANEY: Okay.
PATSY RAMSEY: This guy named Bob Ballis (phonetic) who did some Christmas decorations, he made these things, you know, a year or more before when we had the Christmas open house. He would know about that.
TRIP DEMUTH: My question is: Who had been in that room prior to Christmas of '96, Bob Ballis, was he the Christmas of '95?
PATSY RAMSEY: Yeah. Right.
TRIP DEMUTH: Okay. In the months prior to Christmas of 1996 Fleet would have gone in there?
PATSY RAMSEY: I would say Fleet, the cleaning lady and –
TRIP DEMUTH: Maybe the husband?
PATSY RAMSEY: Maybe the husband and maybe the daughter.
TRIP DEMUTH: How about yourself?
PATSY RAMSEY: Me, taking hiding.
TRIP DEMUTH: Would the children go in there?
PATSY RAMSEY: No. If I had presents in there I would have locked it up.
TRIP DEMUTH: They couldn't reach that?
PATSY RAMSEY: No.
TRIP DEMUTH: Okay. Anyone else besides those people actually go into the wine cellar?
PATSY RAMSEY: Let me think. There were paint cans in there. I think Jay Pedify (phonetic)
would have been likely back there, but I don't remember when we had him, if he was there painting that fall or not.

It’s not clear when or if FW may have previously been in the room.
If he was in the room, he may have been there helping someone such as JR who obviously did know where the light switch was.
PR may also have been trying to throw FW under the bus.

Here is a more detailed account of the wine cellar encounter on Dec. 26:
A. There was a latch, as I recall, that was at the top of the door, and I unlatched it and then opened the -- opened the door and just looked in the room.
Q. Did you open the door completely to look in?
A. Wide enough to look in.
Q. And what did you see?
A. It was dark
Q. Totally dark?
A. As I recall, it was quite dark.
Q. Did any of the light in the hallway illuminate the area when you opened the door, to some extent?
A. Perhaps to some extent, but it was quite dark.
Q. It is my understanding you tried to find a light switch unsuccessfully?
A. Yes.
Q. Which side of the wall did you reach for? Left? Right? Describe for me the extent of your effort to locate a light switch in the wine cellar.
A. I believe I just reached in and felt the wall next to the door and didn't find one, so --
Q. Did you actually step into the room, though?
A. I may have put one -- I may have leaned in, placed one foot in.
Q. Would there be any reason why you would not have simply walked into the room, even though dark, to make an observation?
A. I don't -- I don't remember why I didn't walk in the room
Q. But you did not?
A. I did not walk in the room, other than to, perhaps, lean in or -- far enough to reach around and look for a switch.
Q. When you couldn't find a switch, what did you do?
A. I closed the door.
Q. Did you relatch it?
A. I believe I relatched it.
Q. Were you wearing gloves that morning?
A. No.
Q. Did you ever -- were you ever asked to give a palm print or fingerprints to the Boulder Police Department?
A. Yes.
Q. And you did so?
A. Yes.
Q. Do you recall when you were first asked to give fingerprints and palm prints?
A. Within a few days.
Q. Within a few days of the murder?
A. Yes.
Q. What did you do --
A. As I recall.
Q.-- after you closed the door to the wine cellar?
A. I went back upstairs.
Fleet White Deposition

Thank you for clearing that up for me. I swear it was FW that had been there for the wine. I made sure to change my notes (LOL) my notes are scribbles compared to yours.

Cynic, let me ask you this-- I have also read that JR had bad eye-site thats why he had hired MA. I didnt keep that source in my notes and I could kick myself. But heres what I was wondering, if JR had bad eye-site how is it he saw JBR and FW didnt?

UK, I so agree with you, FW knows a lot more then we think he does. I would give anything to see the notes that he took that day as well as his thoughts in the days that followed. His actions when he came up after JBR had been found, when he crouched by the table and dialled the 3 numbers and just hung up, curious to know your take on that.

Also, shouldnt FW have smelled the decay in the room? Or would the smell have been different if she was father back in the room when he himself had looked in there?

[DeeDee249]

Originally Posted by Agatha_C

Thank you for clearing that up for me. I swear it was FW that had been there for the wine. I made sure to change my notes (LOL) my notes are scribbles compared to yours.

Cynic, let me ask you this-- I have also read that JR had bad eye-site thats why he had hired MA. I didnt keep that source in my notes and I could kick myself. But heres what I was wondering, if JR had bad eye-site how is it he saw JBR and FW didnt?

UK, I so agree with you, FW knows a lot more then we think he does. I would give anything to see the notes that he took that day as well as his thoughts in the days that followed. His actions when he came up after JBR had been found, when he crouched by the table and dialled the 3 numbers and just hung up, curious to know your take on that.

Also, shouldnt FW have smelled the decay in the room? Or would the smell have been different if she was father back in the room when he himself had looked in there?

The odor at that point isn't THAT strong. Det. Arndt, being familiar with this kind of thing, recognized what at that point is more like a sickly- sweet odor. More like a person who hasn't bathed in a week or so. NOT like what the full-wet-decomposition odor would be. Putrefaction is a horrendous odor. Neighbors or passers-by would smell it. But JB was nowhere near that stage of decomposition.
A lot of what Arndt smelled was the stale, dried urine too. That would also not be too strong. Kind of like a cloth diaper that had dried with urine in it. FW probably spent seconds, not minutes, looking in the WC. And he was undoubtedly stressed as anyone would be in that situation. The odor wasn't strong enough to hit him in the face. It isn't unusual that he didn't notice it.

[cynic]

Originally Posted by Agatha_C

Cynic, let me ask you this-- I have also read that JR had bad eye-site thats why he had hired MA. I didnt keep that source in my notes and I could kick myself. But heres what I was wondering, if JR had bad eye-site how is it he saw JBR and FW didnt?

He only required glasses for reading
LOU SMIT: Let's think back just a little bit, John, because sometimes that's important. The
sequence of things. First of all, I notice that you need glasses to read. How was it that you could read that note?
JOHN RAMSEY: It was fairly large print, as I recall. But I can read, if I have to.
LOU SMIT: What was the lighting like there?
JOHN RAMSEY: Seems to me it was -- I don't remember it being dark out. But the light was good.
John Ramsey 1998 interview.

UK, I so agree with you, FW knows a lot more then we think he does. I would give anything to see the notes that he took that day as well as his thoughts in the days that followed.

I agree and would like to know as well.

Also, shouldn’t FW have smelled the decay in the room? Or would the smell have been different if she was father back in the room when he himself had looked in there?

In addition to what DeeDee said, I would like to add that there would have been a 5.5 hour, or so, time difference between when FW peeked in and when JBR was brought upstairs by JR.