 |
|
04-28-2011, 03:06 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 170
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kljohnson0458
Well there ya go. BII. I guess the defense can rest now.  Glad to be on the ground now. |
The jury will not see this testimony. JG already excluded it.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:06 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,536
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncsu95
Gessner has already ruled on this. This is for appeal only. I wonder if Gessner is regretting that decision at this point.
|
Oh, ok. I'm getting very confused. Can he change his decision?
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:07 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,227
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownRice
Why do you think it won't be let in? Seems so unfair not to. This could really "set BC free."
|
Proffered on the record only for purposes of requesting an appeal, testimony will not make it to this jury.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:07 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,536
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnfear
Come on, Boz. You can DO this. Ask just one wrong question so the judge can (at his discretion) allow this back into the defense.
Come on......
|
I didn't understand this comment before. Now I get it.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BrownRice For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:07 PM
|
|
Inactive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 399
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrb0124
Regardless, the evidence was tampered with. The deleted Google maps cookie was a faked file. The state of the files changed after being taken into possession of LE and before any forensic examination. The evidence has no integrity. That's the bottom line.
|
Absolutely. I'm just cutting off the discussion others were having that said "Oh, CPD or neighbors couldn't have hacked it, because it was coming through the VPN."
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to WolfpackWoman For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,129
|
|
|
I may not be in the majority...lol...but no one "tampered" with the computer, IMHO.
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:
|
Amster, borndem, CyberPro, gracielee, LaLaw2000, Madeleine74, MountE, Star12, TallCoolOne, TXredhead178, Wyn |
04-28-2011, 03:10 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,081
|
|
|
whine....beg....whine....beg
__________________
IMO
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Amster For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:10 PM
|
 |
<3
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,188
|
|
|
here we go... big moment here
|
04-28-2011, 03:11 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 1,303
|
|
|
I was just talking to my husband about this. (He has Cisco VPN). I asked him if BC was already on the computer through VPN and since the computer was left on, that is how they could have messed with files through VPN. (he said, sure).
Also, there is VPN software that could be installed on another computer. But there is no reason he would have needed to be on the VPN to get to any files on the computer. He could have just went straight to the computer, outside of the VPN.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sunshine05 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:11 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 803
|
|
|
This is better than a State/UNC/Duke/Wake free-for-all game at the Dome or Cameron.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:11 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,227
|
|
|
Kurtz now asking judge to reconsider allowing witness testimony...
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jrb0124 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:12 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: just beyond infinity
Posts: 238
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RR0004
I may not be in the majority...lol...but no one "tampered" with the computer, IMHO.
|
maybe brad? last ditch effort to cover his tracks?
__________________
Not everyone can paint a realistic portrait, because it is so difficult to attend to all the details, but all of us can view the piece of work. (5,000 details in the human face)
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to LAWsy_ME For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:12 PM
|
|
<3
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,188
|
|
|
for those not watching... Defense asking Judge to reconsider allowing this testimony in court
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to yeknomaras For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:12 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 1,012
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownRice
Oh, ok. I'm getting very confused. Can he change his decision?
|
He certainly can.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to gritguy For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:13 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 803
|
|
|
Poor Boz. Watch this bite him!
Hey judge!
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:13 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 1,012
|
|
|
state saying they are prejudiced by the guy (and to a degree they are) but yet they apparently soon want to introduce new technical evidence. Going to be sticky!
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to gritguy For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:14 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 170
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gritguy
state saying they are prejudiced by the guy (and to a degree they are) but yet they apparently soon want to introduce new technical evidence. Going to be sticky!
|
Oh what a tangled web we weave.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:14 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,335
|
|
|
Kurtz should remind the judge that this witness explained the expertise of JW and why he should be allowed to talk about the files...then allow JW to be recalled.
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ncsu95 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:15 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,655
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownRice
Could be she forgot. When I have my kids with me at the market, I forgot most of the important stuff.
|
I will say Nancy Coopers little girls appeared to be very well-behavied in the shopping cart, while she was checking out. What a sad sight to see. the last time they would ever be out with their mom. 
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to gracielee For This Useful Post:
|
Alcina, angela s, CyberPro, gritguy, LaLaw2000, LAWsy_ME, LyndyLoo, Maja, MountE, Rigby, RR0004 |
04-28-2011, 03:15 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 803
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncsu95
Kurtz should remind the judge that this witness explained the expertise of JW and why he should be allowed to talk about the files...then allow JW to be recalled.
|
Too messy. (Remember the facebook mess)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to johnfear For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:18 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
|
|
|
This might all be moot considering the state of the jury.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GhostCrab For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North of 49th Parallel
Posts: 2,354
|
|
|
I say, let the guy in after the router evidence gets testified to..as maybe it does show exactly who accessed the computer via VPN.... And this witness hasnt even completed his report yet..so bottomline maybe his FINAL anaysis may end up either proving Pros. or Def. side of things....
Just as aside.I liked this witness..he did come across very affable!! pleasant and forthcoming.... Yikes, whole line of typing got missed...Regarding the Cisco coming in late in the game regarding the router...Who found it??Wonder who left it there?...Geesh, I wish Cisco had a better controls of tracking their gear!!
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LyndyLoo For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,356
|
|
|
Where did this expert come from? I missed the beginning.
|
04-28-2011, 03:19 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 325
|
|
|
ornithologist...the owl!
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GhostCrab For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2011, 03:19 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 170
|
|
|
JG..."We may not even get to rebuttal evidence." Wonder what he is thinking there.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cassius For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| © Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 |
New To Site? |
Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
