Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > Caylee Anthony 2 years old > Trial Archive - Threads and References

Notices

Trial Archive - Threads and References Look here for trial information you missed! Trial threads are moved here after court is over for the day.


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #551  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
NavySubMom NavySubMom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,361
My impression, is that the DT is the one who caused this, NOT JA. If it was a "mastermind plan" by the DT to look several steps ahead and try to cause a mistrial, who on the current team sitting in the court room is smart enough for that? CM is the only potential DT member in the court room who could figure this out, unless it was "texted" in....IMO, MOO, etc. But I do not think we are going to get any kind of a mistrial here because of this. IMO, MOO, not a legal opinion of any kind.
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to NavySubMom For This Useful Post:
  #552  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
strach304's Avatar
strach304 strach304 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,606
I just saw the replay on IS and JA did not slam the cans down. His attitude came across to me as indignant this guy is refuting evidence he himself never tested. I saw nothing wrong with his behavior.

From what I've seen JB and CM have been much worse.
  #553  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
Jetaime's Avatar
Jetaime Jetaime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 796
Don't you guys realize that the DEFENSE are the only ones that can use theatrical dramatics? :eyeroll:
Indeed, the irony is rich.
__________________
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Jetaime For This Useful Post:
  #554  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
RSDhoping for a cure's Avatar
RSDhoping for a cure RSDhoping for a cure is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 294
I understand that the "burden of proof" is the states responsibility but could someone explain to me how the DT can throw things out there without having to PROVE the theory their witness is testifying to.

I hope this question makes sense, it did in my head but not sure it came out the same way!
__________________
Keep this rose Going for Caylee ♥
_____/)___/)______./―"""/')
―――――――――\)――\)―――'\_„„„„\)
We love you babygirl!
courtesy of ~n/t~




http://www.rsdhope.org/

http://www.rsdfoundation.org/crps.html
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to RSDhoping for a cure For This Useful Post:
  #555  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
newsjunkie's Avatar
newsjunkie newsjunkie is offline
Not to be confused with A_News_Junkie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,546
Should the State just have no further questions, let him go, and then in rebuttal bring Dr. Vass back up and ask him questions relevant to this witness' testimony? Or is there something that NEEDS to be addressed now?
__________________
“Life is the most spectacular show on earth”
― Sara Gruen
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to newsjunkie For This Useful Post:
  #556  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
Mosby Mosby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleutherontheside View Post
JA is willing to withdraw question and HHJP is not so quick to let him walk away from it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ami View Post
I think HHJP is being so careful right now exactly because of this. So let's not worry if he rules in favor of the defense on this one. The Prosecution has tons of evidence - they can afford to let this lame witness say what he wants, even if it's anti-Vass. Vass can come in later and refute anything this guy says anyway. JA was right to say he'd let go of this line of questioning.
ITA. I think it's best not allow in at this point.
__________________
All posts are my opinion only.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Mosby For This Useful Post:
  #557  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
BigFatMommyDog's Avatar
BigFatMommyDog BigFatMommyDog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Ridge View Post
I thought double jeopardy only applied when someone had actually been aquitted....that they could never ever be tried again for that same crime. No?
It can apply to mistrial under certain circumstances
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to BigFatMommyDog For This Useful Post:
  #558  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:33 PM
raysgirl1126's Avatar
raysgirl1126 raysgirl1126 is offline
Proud to be a New England Patriots Fan!!!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Virgina Beach, VA
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Anarchy View Post
Its called Proffer. Basically the HHJP wants to know the answers to the questions before the witness testifies before the jury.
Thank you!

So then when the jury comes back in do they ask the same questions over again?
__________________
All my posts are my opinion only!

~Justice for all~

“If someone raises a dog to be aggressive it will be, no matter what breed it is.”

"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawakened."
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raysgirl1126 For This Useful Post:
  #559  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:33 PM
faefrost's Avatar
faefrost faefrost is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,303
HHJP cannot let this result in mistrial. Doing so opens the door to allow any defense lawyer to use shoddy questioning as an strategy or mechanism to defend their client. It outright undermines the process and encourages bad behavior instead of good.
  #560  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:33 PM
Mountain_Kat's Avatar
Mountain_Kat Mountain_Kat is offline
Heca, firimar!
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Forest Dweller.
Posts: 8,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by newsjunkie View Post
Should the State just have no further questions, let him go, and then in rebuttal bring Dr. Vass back up and ask him questions relevant to this witness' testimony? Or is there something that NEEDS to be addressed now?
That's how I would deal with it.
__________________
People seldom do what they believe in. They do what is convenient, then repent. ~Bob Dylan
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mountain_Kat For This Useful Post:
  #561  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
stilettos stilettos is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,847
Let that Mack Truck roll..........
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to stilettos For This Useful Post:
  #562  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
PlainJaneDoe's Avatar
PlainJaneDoe PlainJaneDoe is offline
Verified expert in neuroscience
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Who Dat Nation
Posts: 3,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by ami View Post
It's true. Unless their paper is specifically a methods paper (one that describes a new method) or they haven't done anything beyond well-referenced methods, there's almost always something summarized for brevity that could be further explained. And actually I've even had to contact authors of methods papers come to think of it. It's rare and perhaps impossible to get a complete 'users manual' in a publication.
Absolutely! There is always something to ask about or to clarify. Journal space is precious. The authors put in everything they can, but some things don't make the cut. And in my experience, everyone I've contacted in this situation, even our competitors, promptly responded and were helpful because they understand this.
__________________
Kindness is magic. (Derek)

@JaneDoe25 (Twitter)
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to PlainJaneDoe For This Useful Post:
  #563  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
Etiana's Avatar
Etiana Etiana is offline
Truth fears nothing but concealment
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 488
I don't know how HHJP does it! The man is a solid rock of fortitude and patience! He's trying his best to clean up the DT mistakes so that the trial can continue fair and square.
  #564  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
shelbar53 shelbar53 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pa, Macungie
Posts: 600
So did DS make the mistake and JA compound it? I don't understand what the specific problem is?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shelbar53 For This Useful Post:
  #565  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
ami's Avatar
ami ami is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,128
Maybe Ashton should have pulled out a wrinkled memo pad, stuck it on an easel and drawn some pictures of cans (and labeled them "CANNS") and then pointed to them to question the witness.
  #566  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
LadyL's Avatar
LadyL LadyL is offline
Until they all come home
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,277
If I were on the witness stand, and JA slammed those cans in front of me like that, I'd be intimidated & possibly fearful.
__________________
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LadyL For This Useful Post:
  #567  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
Florida Native's Avatar
Florida Native Florida Native is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by liltexans View Post
Judge O.H. Eaton Jr. says he believes a curative instruction to the jury should be enough to repair the problem. No mistrial.
by Jeff Cousins/WESH.com at 1:31 PM

Our legal expert Judge O.H. Eaton doubts a mistrial will happen.
by Jessica Steck/WESH.com at 1:30 PM
For once, I'm glad to hear from Judge E.

I've been thinking about how ICA wrote to her pal that JB said it would end in a mistrial. Did he not explain that she would have to stay in jail and it would be a do-over? I think she thought she could walk away if a mistrial is declared.
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Florida Native For This Useful Post:
  #568  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
Pita's Avatar
Pita Pita is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 359
Anyway you look at it, the jurors heard the final question.
No way to erase that now....yehaaaaaaa
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Pita For This Useful Post:
  #569  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
Dragonlady's Avatar
Dragonlady Dragonlady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 438
The DT's game is to get a mistrial because they fracked up royally and need to start fresh, and HHJP is on to them and trying his hardest to prevent that.

Is it possible for HHJP to do something about this without calling for a mistrial?
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Dragonlady For This Useful Post:
  #570  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
Mosby Mosby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by RSDhoping for a cure View Post
I understand that the "burden of proof" is the states responsibility but could someone explain to me how the DT can throw things out there without having to PROVE the theory their witness is testifying to.

I hope this question makes sense, it did in my head but not sure it came out the same way!
Makes sense to me. But the problem is that the DT has NO burden of proof and is not required to do any testing.
__________________
All posts are my opinion only.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mosby For This Useful Post:
  #571  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
Beyond Belief's Avatar
Beyond Belief Beyond Belief is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida's Treasure Coast
Posts: 14,555
this is what "per bono" gets you......
The Following User Says Thank You to Beyond Belief For This Useful Post:
  #572  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
Linda7NJ's Avatar
Linda7NJ Linda7NJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by ami View Post
Maybe Ashton should have pulled out a wrinkled memo pad, stuck it on an easel and drawn some pictures of cans (and labeled them "CANNS") and then pointed to them to question the witness.
Too flipping funny
__________________


Nosy by Nature and a Websleuther by choice
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Linda7NJ For This Useful Post:
  #573  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
~n/t~'s Avatar
~n/t~ ~n/t~ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,139
The defense is trying to impeach Dr. Vass so how is it fair that the prosecution can't question the defense "expert" on whether or not he could've done the testing. I don't get it.
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ~n/t~ For This Useful Post:
  #574  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
TotallyObsessed's Avatar
TotallyObsessed TotallyObsessed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcrum12 View Post
Burden of Proof shifting to Defense. In criminal law the defense does not have to do anything to include testing, witnesses anything and it can't be used against them for the burden lies solely on the Prosecution.

ETA: When JA asked the witness if he had seen any of the cans and he said no JA then asked if the DT had asked him to test it or if he had tested it - giving jury impression that the defense should have and yet law says they don't have to.

Okay now I'm confusing myself lol.
The DT (per Sims) asked "could you replicate this test?"....opening up the line of questions from JA about did you? Why not? It boils down to the same thing we had the other day about the dna evidence. The DT never sent it, they never asked that this test be replicated, because of what it MIGHT prove against their client. And they didn't have to do that. That would be putting the burden on them to show their client DID NOT DO IT. In a criminal trial, the burden lies with they Prosecution in showing she DID DO IT.
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to TotallyObsessed For This Useful Post:
  #575  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
LoisDenominator's Avatar
LoisDenominator LoisDenominator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 135
What is this pit in my stomach?
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to LoisDenominator For This Useful Post:
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2011.06.27 TRIAL Day Twenty-nine (Afternoon Session) beach Trial Archive - Threads and References 3608 06-27-2011 07:16 PM
2011.06.27 TRIAL Day Twenty-nine (Morning Session) beach Trial Archive - Threads and References 2158 06-27-2011 12:03 PM
2011.06.21 TRIAL Day Twenty-four (Afternoon Session) beach Trial Archive - Threads and References 2435 06-21-2011 05:56 PM
2011.06.17 TRIAL Day Twenty-one (Afternoon Session) beach Trial Archive - Threads and References 2279 06-17-2011 04:51 PM
2011.06.16 TRIAL Day Twenty (Afternoon Session) beach Trial Archive - Threads and References 1411 06-16-2011 04:25 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 AM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!