|
View Poll Results: Do you think the State will decide to prosecute Cindy Anthony?
|
|
Yes, the State will decide to prosecute Cindy Anthony
|
   
|
27 |
6.68% |
|
No, the State will not decide to prosecute Cindy Anthony
|
  
|
148 |
36.63% |
|
Yes, I think the State should prosecute Cindy Anthony
|
  
|
215 |
53.22% |
|
No, I do not think the State should prosecute Cindy Anthony
|
  
|
14 |
3.47% |
 |
|
07-05-2011, 07:55 PM
|
 |
I am not a chemist and this is not my 1st rodeo
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 25,623
|
|
|
Will Cindy be prosecuted for perjury?
I'm thinking that part of the reason that ICA will be set free is due to George and Cindy's lying on the stand.
So ... I'm posting a poll and not sure how to do a two part so I will allow multiple answers.
1) Do you think the State will decide to prosecute Cindy Anthony?
2) Do you think the State should prosecute Cindy Anthony?
|
|
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Liz For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Chiquita71, dog.gone.cute, Gma Kat, gramcracker, HOPE4CAYLEE, Hunnie, jane the dood, jon_burrows, LaLaw2000, LiveLaughLuv, maur33, MissJames, Psmith, rusmol, shaye, songline, Spacegirl, travelgal |
07-05-2011, 07:56 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,072
|
|
|
I asked this early. I think they might.
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nova24 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 07:57 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Columbia River Gorge, WA
Posts: 84
|
|
|
I certainly hope so, but the way things seem to be going in this dog and pony show, I bet JP won't do it!!! PFFFFT!!
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to JanWhitebear For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, BeachGirlFromPA, Chiquita71, cynsational, jen&jonhart, LaLaw2000, LinasK, Liz, Nefriahaia, octobermoon, Thinaire |
07-05-2011, 07:58 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,059
|
|
|
They won't but they should.
__________________
Sin makes its own hell, and goodness its own heaven. ~Mary Baker Eddy
|
|
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to ShouldBWorking For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Chiquita71, coco puff, ExpectingUnicorns, froggierintexas, HOPE4CAYLEE, jane the dood, jen&jonhart, kolokolo, LaLaw2000, mollymil23, Nefriahaia, octobermoon, QueenD, redfish, RR0004, SaltyTexan, smart blonde, Spacegirl, Theonly1, travelgal, Velouria |
07-05-2011, 07:58 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,777
|
|
|
They Should!
|
|
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to iluvmua For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, Chiquita71, coco puff, dog.gone.cute, ExpectingUnicorns, gramcracker, HOPE4CAYLEE, jane the dood, jen&jonhart, jon_burrows, kolokolo, LaLaw2000, LinasK, Mz.Harleywood, Nefriahaia, octobermoon, RR0004, rusmol, Spacegirl, travelgal, Velouria |
07-05-2011, 07:59 PM
|
|
I am not a chemist and this is not my 1st rodeo
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 25,623
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanWhitebear
I certainly hope so, but the way things seem to be going in this dog and pony show, I bet JP won't do it!!! PFFFFT!!
|
Isn't it up to the State, and not Judge Perry?
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Liz For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:01 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,301
|
|
|
I thinnk several lawyers (not from this case) had said they want procecute her. But they should.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to QueenD For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,180
|
|
|
They should but I don't think they will.
IMO
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to jon_burrows For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, Chiquita71, Dragonlady, Etilema, jane the dood, JanWhitebear, jen&jonhart, LaLaw2000, shaye, smart blonde, travelgal |
07-05-2011, 08:06 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Columbia River Gorge, WA
Posts: 84
|
|
|
I wish they would investigate that jury for misconduct though!! They were OBVIOUSLY discussing this case before deliberation.
|
|
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to JanWhitebear For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 4Jacy, 8paws, Chiquita71, crucibelle, Etilema, HOPE4CAYLEE, Hunnie, jane the dood, kolokolo, LaLaw2000, luv, MileHiGranny, Nenato5, octobermoon, pinup, PurpleHaze, RR0004, smart blonde, summerthyme, tezi, travelgal |
07-05-2011, 08:15 PM
|
|
I am not a chemist and this is not my 1st rodeo
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 25,623
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanWhitebear
I wish they would investigate that jury for misconduct though!! They were OBVIOUSLY discussing this case before deliberation.
|
I think you're right!
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Liz For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:17 PM
|
|
I am not a chemist and this is not my 1st rodeo
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 25,623
|
|
|
Sorry all, I messed it up. Apparently I did the poll wrong, and we are unable to select two answers. My bad. Rough day! Maybe I should just go back to bed and start over!
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Liz For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,223
|
|
|
I don't think they will with a NG verdict. I think some would say it is sour grapes/bullying if they went after her now and they want to avoid that appearance.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nikki 01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:28 PM
|
|
Inactive
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,358
|
|
|
Most people dont want or need to see the grandma of a dead child badgered and harassed anymore. Its time to move on.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chablis For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:30 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,850
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikki 01
I don't think they will with a NG verdict. I think some would say it is sour grapes/bullying if they went after her now and they want to avoid that appearance.
|
It would have nothing to do with the verdict. It would be what she herself said.
I think they should. This is a high profile case. Not only do folks now know they can kill their children in FL and get away with it, but it would also look like you can lie under oath and the LE will not do anything about it.
__________________
Just my opinion.....
Finally found a reason for the Ignore feature!
|
|
The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to Spangle For This Useful Post:
|
Ada, crucibelle, dog.gone.cute, Etilema, ExpectingUnicorns, Farfalla40, feddup, Hunnie, jane the dood, JeannieC, Justin Tyme, kimmera, LaLaw2000, LinasK, loreet, Oakley, Panda's eye, PurpleHaze, redfish, RR0004, shaye, smart blonde, travelgal, Truthwillsetufree |
07-05-2011, 08:31 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 20
|
|
|
Sadly, I think everyone is going to wash their hands of this case. They didn't get what they should have and figure it would be a waste of time and $$ to go after her. We know what she did - everyone knows what she did but that family is going to get off scott free with everything criminal. ALL of them!
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Solshine For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:34 PM
|
 |
Kind words do not cost much
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: land of rainbows
Posts: 17,124
|
|
|
Thank you for making such distinct selections! I got thrashed the other day for stating this (I voted this): She should but she won't.
Yes she did lie, yes I think they should go after her, no I still don't think she will be prosecuted. JMHO
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Kat For This Useful Post:
|
djm41, ExpectingUnicorns, jane the dood, jen&jonhart, kolokolo, LaLaw2000, Noddy, RR0004, shaye, smart blonde, songline |
07-05-2011, 08:57 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Columbia River Gorge, WA
Posts: 84
|
|
|
I think she lied and the punishment for lying under oath is being charged with perjury! She should have to go through that. Maybe next time something like this comes up, another person would think twice about committing perjury so easily. I say the Pros SHOULD file perjury charges against her.
|
|
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to JanWhitebear For This Useful Post:
|
4Jacy, Chiquita71, ExpectingUnicorns, gramcracker, HOPE4CAYLEE, Hunnie, jane the dood, Justin Tyme, LaLaw2000, LinasK, MIbarb, Oakley, Psmith, redfish, RR0004, smart blonde, Tipstaff, Truthwillsetufree, Velouria |
07-05-2011, 09:13 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,070
|
|
|
I believe Cindy should be charged with perjury. 15 years. Maybe that will take the smirk off her face.
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Patience For This Useful Post:
|
Chiquita71, coco puff, crucibelle, ExpectingUnicorns, gramcracker, Hunnie, jane the dood, jen&jonhart, Justin Tyme, kimmera, kolokolo, LaLaw2000, LinasK, Oakley, octobermoon, Psmith, PurpleHaze, RR0004, shaye, smart blonde |
07-05-2011, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Adversity does not build character, it reveals it.
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Triangle
Posts: 701
|
|
|
I hope they throw the book at her. Everything they can. This whole family has made a mockery of the justice system. Somebody in that family needs to be held accountable for their actions and since we all know it's not going to be Casey, it needs to be Cindy.
|
|
The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to JB Fletcher For This Useful Post:
|
Azcrabcakes, coco puff, crucibelle, djm41, ExpectingUnicorns, feddup, gramcracker, Hunnie, jane the dood, Justin Tyme, kimmera, LaLaw2000, LinasK, MIbarb, Oakley, Psmith, PurpleHaze, RR0004, shaye, Tipstaff, travelgal, Truthwillsetufree, twomanywords, Velouria |
07-05-2011, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,022
|
|
|
Although I would love it to happen, I believe they are done with this family.
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to jandkmom For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-05-2011, 09:21 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 394
|
|
|
After this verdict, i am not even sure they'd be allowed to. So, sadly: no.
|
07-05-2011, 09:23 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 31
|
|
|
If CA goes to jail, KC will truly have no one to bankroll her and protect her. This reason alone is enough for me.
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Carnie For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-06-2011, 08:09 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: oklahoma/heart of tornado alley
Posts: 552
|
|
|
oh yes they SHOULD!!! since ica got away w/ murder, no more appeals, or retrials or anything..they can TOTALLY file perjury charges on CA, right?
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to charok For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-06-2011, 08:17 AM
|
 |
Pillars of Autumn
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In the Pines
Posts: 2,482
|
|
|
She will get away with it. Seems the Anthony's get away with a lot.
__________________
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to JBounds For This Useful Post:
|
ExpectingUnicorns, HOPE4CAYLEE, jane the dood, Justin Tyme, Katana, LaLaw2000, LancelotLink, Matty29, PurpleHaze, SaltyTexan, shaye, Truthwillsetufree |
07-06-2011, 08:18 AM
|
 |
For you little sky.
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 432
|
|
|
No they wont, but they should.
They wont because she is a relative of the victim. They should as I think her testimony helped casey get off
__________________
Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Albert Einstein:
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to UKgirl For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| © Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 |
New To Site? |
Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
