 |
|
07-09-2011, 02:26 PM
|
|
Inactive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 721
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeenaBobba
I'm kind of skeptical that she'll show up for this because I think that her attorneys will find a way for her to weasel her way out of it. But if she refuses to show up for a valid reason, would she be held in contempt?
|
She's a convicted felon, so maybe the three strikes law can help out here...and isn't she on some kind of probation?
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Nefriahaia For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 02:37 PM
|
 |
Verified Attorney
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,701
|
|
|
Casey could still take the 5th as to those specific lies for which she was convicted until the appeal process is over, because there is a risk of retrial. And unfortunately, there is almost nothing ZG's lawyers could ask that we would be interested in hearing that wouldn't somehow connect with the lie that Casey dropped off Caylee with ZFG at Sawgrass apartments.
I assumed she wouldn't appeal, but JB said that she might. ZG's lawyers might at least want to reschedule the depo after the appeal time ends--prob 30 days or so.
__________________
"It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94
|
|
The Following 31 Users Say Thank You to AZlawyer For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, ahoyhoy, Americka, BeenaBobba, Chiquita71, clannad, DIXIECAT, ExpectingUnicorns, gramcracker, Harmony2, JSV, Justin Tyme, kimmera, LaLaw2000, Leila, magnolia, MissJames, mombomb, MysticOne, Nefriahaia, NocturnalLady, Psmith, Rhyme & Reason, samsmom, sarah7855, Sooner Fan#1, suzihawk, Talison, tezi, The Eunice Burns, Velouria |
07-09-2011, 02:37 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,537
|
|
|
Not a three strikes felony = bad checks
No probation= already served
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to SondraK For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 02:47 PM
|
 |
Vincit omnia veritas!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 421
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZlawyer
I assumed she wouldn't appeal, but JB said that she might. ZG's lawyers might at least want to reschedule the depo after the appeal time ends--prob 30 days or so.
|
I think it would probably be wise for Morgan to do that. I can see Casey's attorney appealing right before her deposition so that she wouldn't have to answer any interesting questions. If that were the case, could he take part of her deposition then and reschedule the rest for later?
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to BeenaBobba For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 02:55 PM
|
|
Verified Attorney
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeenaBobba
I think it would probably be wise for Morgan to do that. I can see Casey's attorney appealing right before her deposition so that she wouldn't have to answer any interesting questions. If that were the case, could he take part of her deposition then and reschedule the rest for later?
|
Yes, but it would be a disappointing deposition if he can't ask anything that implicates her in a lie about dropping off Caylee with ZFG at Sawgrass.
__________________
"It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to AZlawyer For This Useful Post:
|
Americka, BeenaBobba, gramcracker, JSV, Justin Tyme, kimmera, LaLaw2000, Leila, MissJames, Nefriahaia, Rhyme & Reason, Sooner Fan#1 |
07-09-2011, 03:00 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 12,439
|
|
|
What's the date of the civil trial? I seem to remember it's in mid-August, but vaguely remember the date changed.
I doubt that KC will be available for this depo. I think the plan is for KC to leave Orlando upon release from jail. I remember way back when, KC bragged to someone (Robin?) that when she got out of jail JB promised she'd be lying on a beach in Miami sunbathingl I'm wondering if that's where she's headed............put up at a private residence or a hotel in Miami pending her first official interview.
__________________
 My posts are my opinion..........
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Leila For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, gramcracker, JDzWife, JSV, Justin Tyme, MissJames, Nefriahaia, NocturnalLady, Psmith, Sooner Fan#1, The Eunice Burns |
07-09-2011, 03:08 PM
|
|
'wild rose country...'
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,855
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mombomb
The clerks office info on this case shows that some trial testimony was filed in this case ia few days ago. Is there any way we can see what that is? Wonder what parts.
|
--------it was baez's opening statement.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...,5979651.story
By Amy Pavuk, Orlando Sentinel
6:38 p.m. EDT, July 8, 2011
Casey Anthony: Transcript of murder trial opening statement filed in defamation case
__________________
my opinion...........and i happen to agree with it.....
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to lauriej For This Useful Post:
|
ahi, Americka, clannad, DIXIECAT, gramcracker, Harmony2, Justin Tyme, LaLaw2000, MissJames, NocturnalLady, Psmith, sarah7855, smart blonde, Sooner Fan#1 |
07-09-2011, 03:12 PM
|
|
I've been known to be a little too "woo-woo."
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ya-Ya Land
Posts: 385
|
|
|
Didn't OJ just refuse to show up for the Goldmans' civil suit against him, thus causing a default judgment to be entered against him? Is that the applicable law in Florida?
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to AdoraBlue For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 03:16 PM
|
|
Verified Attorney
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdoraBlue
Didn't OJ just refuse to show up for the Goldmans' civil suit against him, thus causing a default judgment to be entered against him? Is that the applicable law in Florida?
|
That could happen too, yes.
__________________
"It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to AZlawyer For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, ahoyhoy, Americka, BeenaBobba, clannad, DIXIECAT, gramcracker, JSV, Justin Tyme, lajones81, LaLaw2000, lauriej, MysticOne, NocturnalLady, Nova24, Rhyme & Reason, Sooner Fan#1, The Eunice Burns, Velouria, zoomom |
07-09-2011, 03:29 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,757
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdoraBlue
Didn't OJ just refuse to show up for the Goldmans' civil suit against him, thus causing a default judgment to be entered against him? Is that the applicable law in Florida?
|
I can find no information that Simpson wasn't at his civil trial. He seems to have given testimony which partly sunk him.
Quote:
Simpson's Own Testimony
Our legal system is designed to allow a criminal defendant to decline to take the witness stand, not so in a civil lawsuit. Jurors' judgments of Simpson's performance were a key factor in the jury finding him liable. The credibility of his entire testimony was called in to question. Note that most opinion polls taken after Simpson took the stand showed many people found his spousal abuse denial quite incredulous.
|
__________________
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Hot Dogs For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 04:31 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,395
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nefriahaia
To be "under oath" doesn't seem to mean doodly squat to KC or the rest of her tribe.
|
Ha, I was just going to say the same thing! Under Oath hasn't fazed these people in the past, why start now? LOL
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Rhyme & Reason For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 04:48 PM
|
 |
Pisces
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hellaware
Posts: 905
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZlawyer
Yes, but it would be a disappointing deposition if he can't ask anything that implicates her in a lie about dropping off Caylee with ZFG at Sawgrass.
|
Couldn't he ask her what really happened, though? Like ask her to tell the drowning story?
__________________
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Krishnamurti
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to crucibelle For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 05:38 PM
|
|
Verified Attorney
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crucibelle
Couldn't he ask her what really happened, though? Like ask her to tell the drowning story?
|
Not while she's appealing the lying convictions (if she appeals) IMO. Any answer she would give would prove that she did, in fact, lie when she told LE that she left Caylee with ZFG at Sawgrass.
__________________
"It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to AZlawyer For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Amity, DIXIECAT, gramcracker, JSV, KenoshaKid, LaLaw2000, MissJames, MysticOne, Psmith, Rhyme & Reason, Sooner Fan#1 |
07-09-2011, 05:40 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,072
|
|
|
Do you think they will hide her in mental health facility and get doc to say too ill right now to participate to buy some time?
I would think she would want to give public IV for money before doing this depo or no one might want to pay if she answers questions here. I guess for depo she could just take the 5th and then do IV after it.
I think her IV window is rather short. A few months from now people won't care as much.
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Nova24 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 06:01 PM
|
 |
Overreaching
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 6,360
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdoraBlue
Didn't OJ just refuse to show up for the Goldmans' civil suit against him, thus causing a default judgment to be entered against him? Is that the applicable law in Florida?
|
He showed up and yes, his testimony helped sink him. He said he never wore those "Ugly-A** shoes" but they found photos of him in those same "Ugly-A**" shoes.
However, the civil trial attorneys did a much better job of detailing the evidence and didn't have as much of the circus atmosphere.
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Texana For This Useful Post:
|
azwriter, downport, gramcracker, LaLaw2000, LinasK, MissJames, Nana46, NocturnalLady, nomoresorrow, Rhyme & Reason, Sooner Fan#1, tezi, Velouria |
07-09-2011, 06:52 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1
|
|
|
This is the first Ive heard on KC going to therapy after she is released. Where can I find this information?
Thank you,
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ndn4ou For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: wherever they send me
Posts: 9,992
|
|
Knock knock.
Who's there?
Casey's disposition date.
Oh, cool! Is he hawt? 
looking forward to the sunshine law download on this fantasy of a depo.
__________________
I know where you post.
|
|
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Emma Peel For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Azcrabcakes, DIXIECAT, Farfalla40, gramcracker, JEN12376, luvmygarden, Nana46, Ninsi, Rhyme & Reason, Sooner Fan#1, tezi, Tiki, Velouria, zoomom |
07-09-2011, 07:33 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 114
|
|
|
I have a question on this as I missed most of the ZG stuff before really listening to Nancy Grace and others while mom watched....but why is this particular ZFG suing Casey? Was their something Casey did or said that pointed to this specific woman?
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to robmom For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:37 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 785
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hisimage
So where will this be streamed? How will we be able to watch it?
|
You can be sure that there will be an objection to this if at all possible.
Also, I am not sure why her defense have moved to postpone or squash the subpoena.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to uklaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:39 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,195
|
|
Could she still appeal it if she has already served her sentence? What for? So it's not on her record I guess. Just those felony check convictions.  Does anyone know what time it is scheduled for?
__________________
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to strawberry For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:40 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,195
|
|
|
Matt Morgan tweeted that it would be live streamed.
Even if they don't livestream it I'm sure it would be uploaded to their website the same day.
__________________
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to strawberry For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:41 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 785
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZlawyer
Not while she's appealing the lying convictions (if she appeals) IMO. Any answer she would give would prove that she did, in fact, lie when she told LE that she left Caylee with ZFG at Sawgrass.
|
In actuality couldn't she just take the 5th to any question asked?
The convictions are for lying to LE (I think one is for lying about the phanton ZFG) and this suit is about lying to LE about this Zaneida Gonzales. Therefore, any question relevant to the action is also relevant to the criminal case and subject to 5th amendment privilege.
Also could the Defense move to postpone on the basis of mental health grounds?
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to uklaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:45 PM
|
 |
Scars remind us where we've been. They don't have to dictate where we're going.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,099
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by uklaw
In actuality couldn't she just take the 5th to any question asked?
The convictions are for lying to LE (I think one is for lying about the phanton ZFG) and this suit is about lying to LE about this Zaneida Gonzales. Therefore, any question relevant to the action is also relevant to the criminal case and subject to 5th amendment privilege.
Also could the Defense move to postpone on the basis of mental health grounds?
|
Casey can no longer plead the 5th because she has been acquitted/outstanding case now closed. I think AZLawyer answers this question in our questions for lawyers thread. She explains it much better than me.
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to nomoresorrow For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:46 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,442
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by strawberry
Could she still appeal it if she has already served her sentence? What for? So it's not on her record I guess. Just those felony check convictions. Does anyone know what time it is scheduled for? |
I thought I read 10:00 somewhere this morning, but now I can't find it to provide a link 
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mombomb For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-09-2011, 07:47 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 785
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomoresorrow
Casey can no longer plead the 5th because she has been acquitted/outstanding case now closed. I think AZLawyer answers this question in our questions for lawyers thread. She explains it much better than me.
|
Actually no. Read comments re: o/s appeal.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to uklaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
civil trial, defamation of charac, deposition, fernandez, libel, morgan&morgan, slander, xanax, zanny, zenaida f-gonzalez, zenaida fernandez-g, zf-g  |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| © Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 |
New To Site? |
Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
