Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > Caylee Anthony 2 years old

Notices

Caylee Anthony 2 years old Not reported missing for a month after she was last seen.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 12-10-2011, 12:50 PM
LambChop's Avatar
LambChop LambChop is online now
WS Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: CT/NC
Posts: 17,612
Well, we do have to admit that it is so much easier to disagree with findings when we are not experts. For the ME's they are required to report what they have found and they are required to report their findings. I think Dr. G. has done an excellent job of reporting what she believes happened to Caylee based on her vast knowledge and education.

I don't think the defense team, in the end, disagreed that there was tape originally on Caylee's face and where it was specifically located because of their claim that someone else placed the body at the remains site. They really can't have it two ways but we have to admit they sure tried. lol jmo
__________________
A lie will go round the world before the truth gets its pants on - Charles Spurgeon
Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:
  #77  
Old 12-10-2011, 02:48 PM
RR0004's Avatar
RR0004 RR0004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcrum12 View Post
He may have stated it on the Dr Phil show but CSI Hanson, Dr Shultz, Dr Utz, nor Dr G ever testified in court that the tape was covering her mouth and/or nose.
Uh...maybe 'cause there wasn't a mouth or a nose left? Seeing that JA is a lay person he might have interpreted the doctor's findings as such.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:
  #78  
Old 12-10-2011, 03:04 PM
ZsaZsa ZsaZsa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcrum12 View Post
fwiw, no where in the autopsy report does it state that tape was "wrapped around" the face, mouth and nose. It actually states that tape was attached to the hair and overlying the mandible and maxilla, per Dr Utz (the first ME to examine the remains). Dr Shultz states that it can be INFERRED that the tape was what could have held the mandible in place. However, it is also noted that plant growth had permeated the remains. IMO, this too could have held the mandible. And that is exactly what CSI Hanson, Dr. Shultz and Dr. Utz testified to in court. No expert testified that the duct tape was responsible for holding the mandible in place during the decompositional process in court. Also, IMO, the muck could have been responsible for the position of the skull and mandible. I don't see how the duct tape could have held the mandible. The skin, hair and duct tape would have loosened before the jaw muscles decomposed. The PT theory the tape was applied to the skin, then skin loosened and fell off the face but somehow the tape held enough to keep the mandible in anatomical postion? IMO, I just can't buy it. Again, all JMOO.

ETA: As to Dr. Spitz, his theory was just a smokescreen put on by the defense.
You should read page 14 of Dr Garavaglia's report, paragraph 3 - the part where it says colored tape was found to be covering the mouth and nasal aperture areas by Dr Schult and Dr Utz.
Reply With Quote
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to ZsaZsa For This Useful Post:
  #79  
Old 12-11-2011, 11:10 PM
Baznme's Avatar
Baznme Baznme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northern Adirondack Mountains
Posts: 4,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZsaZsa View Post
You should read page 14 of Dr Garavaglia's report, paragraph 3 - the part where it says colored tape was found to be covering the mouth and nasal aperture areas by Dr Schult and Dr Utz.
Also on Pg. 3, Paragraph 2 where it states there is duct tape over the lower facial region still attached to head hair. "This duct tape was clearly placed prior to decomposition, keeping the mandible in place". So much for the theory of the the duct tape breaking down losing its' ability to remain "attached". All three doctors signed off on this report. Also, if the mandible is the medical term for the lower jaw and the maxilla is the medical term for the upper jaw, what part of her airway would have been uncovered? None....is the answer I come up with.

Who....other than Casey had the hidden 31 days, the death car, the lies, the thieving and deception, a tattoo all happening while her 2 year old daughter was allegedly "missing" yet, admittedly was "never missing" according to her own attorney. No one.......is the answer I come up with.

According to the latest news, two thirds of the country think so too. I've been sick about the verdict since it was read and I hope that Dr. G's show on the 1st of January will clear up a lot of "armchair theories" and put them to rest for the sake of this poor child's unjustified fate.
__________________
My posts are my opinion only.....
Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Baznme For This Useful Post:
  #80  
Old 12-11-2011, 11:38 PM
RR0004's Avatar
RR0004 RR0004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baznme View Post
Also on Pg. 3, Paragraph 2 where it states there is duct tape over the lower facial region still attached to head hair. "This duct tape was clearly placed prior to decomposition, keeping the mandible in place". So much for the theory of the the duct tape breaking down losing its' ability to remain "attached". All three doctors signed off on this report. Also, if the mandible is the medical term for the lower jaw and the maxilla is the medical term for the upper jaw, what part of her airway would have been uncovered? None....is the answer I come up with.

Who....other than Casey had the hidden 31 days, the death car, the lies, the thieving and deception, a tattoo all happening while her 2 year old daughter was allegedly "missing" yet, admittedly was "never missing" according to her own attorney. No one.......is the answer I come up with.

According to the latest news, two thirds of the country think so too. I've been sick about the verdict since it was read and I hope that Dr. G's show on the 1st of January will clear up a lot of "armchair theories" and put them to rest for the sake of this poor child's unjustified fate.
I'm still amazed that a group of 12 people would think someone would lie about a "drowning" because that's what Casey did (if you believe the DT)...she lied and made it a "kidnapping"...by her own words. She would lie and sit in jail for 3 years with her life on the line. Because her mother would be angry at her and never forgive her? It just doesn't make sense!
Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:
  #81  
Old 12-12-2011, 04:14 AM
ZsaZsa ZsaZsa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by RR0004 View Post
I'm still amazed that a group of 12 people would think someone would lie about a "drowning" because that's what Casey did (if you believe the DT)...she lied and made it a "kidnapping"...by her own words. She would lie and sit in jail for 3 years with her life on the line. Because her mother would be angry at her and never forgive her? It just doesn't make sense!
Jeff said that too. Who would possibly take a truly accidental death and alter the story in order to make it sound like a kidnapping and murder?
We have heard FCA talking to her mother in such a contemptuous manner that the possibility she was afraid of her reaction to anything is laughable.
Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to ZsaZsa For This Useful Post:
  #82  
Old 12-12-2011, 04:30 AM
Dewey2Me1MoThyme's Avatar
Dewey2Me1MoThyme Dewey2Me1MoThyme is offline
Have clue will sleuth!
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: southwest Indiana
Posts: 5,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
Well, we do have to admit that it is so much easier to disagree with findings when we are not experts. For the ME's they are required to report what they have found and they are required to report their findings. I think Dr. G. has done an excellent job of reporting what she believes happened to Caylee based on her vast knowledge and education.

I don't think the defense team, in the end, disagreed that there was tape originally on Caylee's face and where it was specifically located because of their claim that someone else placed the body at the remains site. They really can't have it two ways but we have to admit they sure tried. lol jmo
I also thought that one big clue the PT didn't drive home but left for the jury to figure out, was that duct tape was also found in the same grid area as some the hand bones. Neither JA nor Mr. George directly connect the two because they may have thought it was obvious enough for the jurors to grasp on their own. It was like a jigsaw puzzle with huge peices sitting along side that the 12 did not look at and come to a conclusion where they fit into the picture, although I myself thought it was a given.
__________________
Anything worth dewing, is worth dewing well!
Proud parent of 3 rescued schnauzers
Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Dewey2Me1MoThyme For This Useful Post:
  #83  
Old 12-12-2011, 10:28 AM
Dells Dells is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by RR0004 View Post
I'm still amazed that a group of 12 people would think someone would lie about a "drowning" because that's what Casey did (if you believe the DT)...she lied and made it a "kidnapping"...by her own words. She would lie and sit in jail for 3 years with her life on the line. Because her mother would be angry at her and never forgive her? It just doesn't make sense!
I so agree w/you! Like casey's mother wouldn't be mad that Caylee was "kidnapped" and then casey failed to report it for 31 days? With both of those scenarios I could see a mother (even Cindy) being less mad about an accidental drowning than she would be about an unreported kidnapping. But, whatever. I guess the jury made up their minds and they thought it was plausible that Caylee accidentally drowned. I just wonder if any of them ever look back and realize that they did the wrong thing? Not that I am expecting any of them to admit to it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Dells For This Useful Post:
  #84  
Old 12-12-2011, 10:30 AM
Dells Dells is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZsaZsa View Post
Jeff said that too. Who would possibly take a truly accidental death and alter the story in order to make it sound like a kidnapping and murder?
We have heard FCA talking to her mother in such a contemptuous manner that the possibility she was afraid of her reaction to anything is laughable.
Bolding by me....

That was such a good point made by him, and once he made it I truly thought the state had the case in the bag. I just cannot understand how I saw things so differently from this jury.
Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Dells For This Useful Post:
  #85  
Old 12-25-2011, 07:38 PM
Tulessa's Avatar
Tulessa Tulessa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: On top of the beautiful Appalachian Mountains.
Posts: 11,034
Bumping this because it's getting close.
__________________
Don't murder in Kentucky! My thread here.

http://websleuths.com/forums/showthr...n+lisa+tackett

Alan and Lisa Tackett. Murdered, March 2008. Sweet Justice, 2012
Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Tulessa For This Useful Post:
  #86  
Old 12-25-2011, 07:39 PM
Tulessa's Avatar
Tulessa Tulessa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: On top of the beautiful Appalachian Mountains.
Posts: 11,034
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/ent...k-at-case.html
__________________
Don't murder in Kentucky! My thread here.

http://websleuths.com/forums/showthr...n+lisa+tackett

Alan and Lisa Tackett. Murdered, March 2008. Sweet Justice, 2012
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Tulessa For This Useful Post:
  #87  
Old 12-25-2011, 10:28 PM
Nore's Avatar
Nore Nore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,322




YES!!!! ONE MORE WEEK!!!
__________________
~Welcome to Lake Erie Snow~
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nore For This Useful Post:
  #88  
Old 12-27-2011, 08:57 AM
Tulessa's Avatar
Tulessa Tulessa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: On top of the beautiful Appalachian Mountains.
Posts: 11,034
Ohhhh noo you don't! Get you hinny back up there thread!! BUMMMMMPPPPP!




__________________
Don't murder in Kentucky! My thread here.

http://websleuths.com/forums/showthr...n+lisa+tackett

Alan and Lisa Tackett. Murdered, March 2008. Sweet Justice, 2012
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Tulessa For This Useful Post:
  #89  
Old 12-27-2011, 06:59 PM
Nore's Avatar
Nore Nore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,322
Going Up!!!
__________________
~Welcome to Lake Erie Snow~
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Nore For This Useful Post:
  #90  
Old 12-29-2011, 02:14 AM
Just Jayla's Avatar
Just Jayla Just Jayla is offline
I love my APBT
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Culpeper, Virginia
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZsaZsa View Post
Jeff said that too. Who would possibly take a truly accidental death and alter the story in order to make it sound like a kidnapping and murder?
We have heard FCA talking to her mother in such a contemptuous manner that the possibility she was afraid of her reaction to anything is laughable.
Dr. Jan Garavaglia, who has been in Orange County for many years now and worked on thousands of cases, testified that the answer to your question is....no one.
The most important question, IMO, is what kind of judge, state's attorney, and defense team in a death penalty case would put such a rushed timeline on a case involving the fate of a 22 year old and the death of her daughter? I thought their timeline was rushed when they gave it to HHJS/HHJP early on. And was it ever.
And what kind of judge would impanel a jury that would only serve if the timeline was short or a juror that refused to judge people, because to not impanel them would mean time and money finding homeless people to serve instead? Those were the first moments I felt let down by the state and HHJP, in voir dire. The US Constitution, and I am sure the Constitution of Florida, does not instruct that a person get their due process, or that a victim receive justice when their right to Life is infringed, with the caveat that those rights come with a budget or a price tag.
Please, no need to reply about the broke-arse financial state Florida is in, don't care. Just because a great majority of our country thinks with their watch and their pocketbook instead of their moral compass is not for me to resolve. I am glad to stray from the crowd on that one.
Maybe HHJP should have impaneled homeless people, betcha they would have served far more honorably.
In fact, when it suited HHJP, he let the defense have plenty of time to muck around. A ton of time. Served his purpose, I write, because he did not want to be overturned on appeal for sure. So, it's okay for a judge to protect his record by allowing a defense team ample time, but if the state wants to strike a juror that cannot judge people, then the judge cannot waste time and must rush to impanel her and move on? Please.
Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Just Jayla For This Useful Post:
  #91  
Old 12-29-2011, 03:14 AM
princesspjs's Avatar
princesspjs princesspjs is offline
.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 2,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Jayla View Post
Dr. Jan Garavaglia, who has been in Orange County for many years now and worked on thousands of cases, testified that the answer to your question is....no one.
The most important question, IMO, is what kind of judge, state's attorney, and defense team in a death penalty case would put such a rushed timeline on a case involving the fate of a 22 year old and the death of her daughter? I thought their timeline was rushed when they gave it to HHJS/HHJP early on. And was it ever.
And what kind of judge would impanel a jury that would only serve if the timeline was short or a juror that refused to judge people, because to not impanel them would mean time and money finding homeless people to serve instead? Those were the first moments I felt let down by the state and HHJP, in voir dire. The US Constitution, and I am sure the Constitution of Florida, does not instruct that a person get their due process, or that a victim receive justice when their right to Life is infringed, with the caveat that those rights come with a budget or a price tag.
Please, no need to reply about the broke-arse financial state Florida is in, don't care. Just because a great majority of our country thinks with their watch and their pocketbook instead of their moral compass is not for me to resolve. I am glad to stray from the crowd on that one.
Maybe HHJP should have impaneled homeless people, betcha they would have served far more honorably.
In fact, when it suited HHJP, he let the defense have plenty of time to muck around. A ton of time. Served his purpose, I write, because he did not want to be overturned on appeal for sure. So, it's okay for a judge to protect his record by allowing a defense team ample time, but if the state wants to strike a juror that cannot judge people, then the judge cannot waste time and must rush to impanel her and move on? Please.
Thanks for putting this into words for me - I feel like you just explained yet another aspect of the whole trial that I hadn't been able to put down in words on my own. You described exactly the same things that caught my attention during jury selection.

The first glimpse we had at the justice system's failure that was soon to follow.

I can't wait to watch Dr. G's episode about Caylee Marie...yet another stranger among millions of strangers to Caylee Marie who cried genuine tears for her.
Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to princesspjs For This Useful Post:
  #92  
Old 12-29-2011, 05:32 AM
bayouland's Avatar
bayouland bayouland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Jayla View Post
Dr. Jan Garavaglia, who has been in Orange County for many years now and worked on thousands of cases, testified that the answer to your question is....no one.
The most important question, IMO, is what kind of judge, state's attorney, and defense team in a death penalty case would put such a rushed timeline on a case involving the fate of a 22 year old and the death of her daughter? I thought their timeline was rushed when they gave it to HHJS/HHJP early on. And was it ever.
And what kind of judge would impanel a jury that would only serve if the timeline was short or a juror that refused to judge people, because to not impanel them would mean time and money finding homeless people to serve instead? Those were the first moments I felt let down by the state and HHJP, in voir dire. The US Constitution, and I am sure the Constitution of Florida, does not instruct that a person get their due process, or that a victim receive justice when their right to Life is infringed, with the caveat that those rights come with a budget or a price tag.
Please, no need to reply about the broke-arse financial state Florida is in, don't care. Just because a great majority of our country thinks with their watch and their pocketbook instead of their moral compass is not for me to resolve. I am glad to stray from the crowd on that one.
Maybe HHJP should have impaneled homeless people, betcha they would have served far more honorably.
In fact, when it suited HHJP, he let the defense have plenty of time to muck around. A ton of time. Served his purpose, I write, because he did not want to be overturned on appeal for sure. So, it's okay for a judge to protect his record by allowing a defense team ample time, but if the state wants to strike a juror that cannot judge people, then the judge cannot waste time and must rush to impanel her and move on? Please.
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to bayouland For This Useful Post:
  #93  
Old 12-29-2011, 08:33 AM
LinTX LinTX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 304
Per NBC on twitter, Dr. G. will be on the Today show this morning...
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to LinTX For This Useful Post:
  #94  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:20 AM
watcher9 watcher9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North GA
Posts: 2,593
I missed it.
Did anyone get to watch or tape this?
What did Dr. G say?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to watcher9 For This Useful Post:
  #95  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:33 AM
LinTX LinTX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 304
She hasn't been on yet...just now introduced her for the upcoming segment
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to LinTX For This Useful Post:
  #96  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:33 AM
bayouland's Avatar
bayouland bayouland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,502
Quote:
Originally Posted by watcher9 View Post
I missed it.
Did anyone get to watch or tape this?
What did Dr. G say?
You didn't miss it. Coming up NOW
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bayouland For This Useful Post:
  #97  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:44 AM
logicalgirl's Avatar
logicalgirl logicalgirl is offline
Peace Hawk
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayouland View Post
You didn't miss it. Coming up NOW
Hi Bayouland... ...can you make some comments about content? Can't get the today show where I live -
__________________
When there is Justice - there is Peace.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to logicalgirl For This Useful Post:
  #98  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:54 AM
watcher9 watcher9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North GA
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by logicalgirl View Post
Hi Bayouland... ...can you make some comments about content? Can't get the today show where I live -
Not on yet. They did hair and now are cooking.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to watcher9 For This Useful Post:
  #99  
Old 12-29-2011, 10:08 AM
bayouland's Avatar
bayouland bayouland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,502
Quote:
Originally Posted by logicalgirl View Post
Hi Bayouland... ...can you make some comments about content? Can't get the today show where I live -
My take warning No quotes, sorry.

She basically reiterated that she had very good reason for saying the death was a homicide by undetermined means. Her special coming up is to set the record straight on how she came to that conclusion and debunk the snippets and soundbytes by the defense that make it seem like her report was baseless.

It was obvious she is sick of this crap and is going on record to tell it like it is. She stopped short of blaming FCA for the murder saying it was not her job to determine who - instead to determine what happened. Sje said however that she was responsible for Caylee.

That's about it really. I taped it and will watch it back to see if I missed anything juicy.
Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to bayouland For This Useful Post:
  #100  
Old 12-29-2011, 10:14 AM
jamiect's Avatar
jamiect jamiect is offline
Wandering but not lost
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 736
Today Show interview for all that missed.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/261848...14632#45814632
Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to jamiect For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony" 48 Hours special on ID Channel now PrayersForMaura Caylee Anthony 2 years old 66 01-30-2011 10:54 AM
2010.05.07 Caylee special on In Session right now! s1rebecca Caylee Anthony 2 years old 47 05-07-2010 03:26 PM
Special Report on Caylee Anthony Case Levi Caylee Anthony 2 years old 7 12-20-2009 10:58 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 PM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!