Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > Hot Cases > Holly Bobo General Discussion Threads

Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #526  
Old 06-30-2012, 04:46 AM
Mr. Noatak Mr. Noatak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili Fries View Post
Here Whisperer...

The unattached garage in the pic I posted above has been built since Holly disappeared. It may house her car and probably has something to do with Dana's work too, since in the recent videos you can see large trucks parked behind the house also which obviously have something to do with his work.

Yes, Holly's car was a Mustang:



Here is the view into the garage from the back door area (from AMW). There is an opening Clint could see into from the back door:



And here is where you can see where Clint saw them walking into the woods from his vantage point looking out the back door:

My opinions only, no facts here:

This case screams out- local yokel. I respect and do not necessarily disagree with even the most provocative posts of the past several days. There are many potential players in this case and some of the names can only be gleaned by visiting other sites. Websleuths is ultimately the best crime-solving website because it has sensible oversight. But to get the complete flavor of this case you will need to review postings at some of the more anarchistic competing websites.

I somehow doubt that police investigated inside of Holly's home on the day she disappeared. I say this only for the reasons that such a search has never been confirmed by a family member OR law enforcement, to this day. Correct me if I am wrong about this detail.

There has been no official confirmation if ANYONE in Tennessee, who could realistically be related to this case, has taken a polygraph. Again, correct me if I am wrong about this statement.

I have identified multiple motives for the Holly Bobo case that would not be allowed on Websleuths. I have some areas to look, and these have been previously posted by me at this site. Since day one, I have been troubled by the potential number of wood-chipper machines in the area.
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Mr. Noatak For This Useful Post:
  #527  
Old 06-30-2012, 05:22 AM
Almondjoy Almondjoy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili Fries View Post
No need to be stunned, the info you responded to was incorrect. Here is a still from that video which shows Karen pointing to where Holly's car was parked:



Her car was parked in the carport attached to the house.

http://wreg.com/2012/04/09/one-year-...n-a-nightmare/
Am I missing something? This video seems to make it very clear that Holly's car was parked in the detached garage to which she is pointing. The attached garage, with doors closed, is behind her when she is pointing out to where Holly's car was that day! The video also has a quick but good shot of the back door Clint was looking out when he saw her walk into the woods. There is also good perspective for the distance from the back door to the spot where she entered the woods. If you stop the video at 38 and 40 seconds, you can see some of this detail.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Almondjoy For This Useful Post:
  #528  
Old 06-30-2012, 07:11 AM
Oriah Oriah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,208
I am interested in the subject of possible text conversations, which has not been brought up much in Holly's case.

911 calls contain recorded dialogue, so of course it would be helpful to hear them. But txt messaging is 'recorded' as well as many other forms of cell communication. E911 jumps to mind immediately, as well as all of the other services providers have available for their customers such as email, internet, GPS etc. Often a treasure trove in locating missing persons, and something that should be discussed imvho.

An E911 is almost as good as an EPIRB. Heck, it IS an EPIRB, essentially. Does this mean that Holly made no calls from her cell after...what point?
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Oriah For This Useful Post:
  #529  
Old 06-30-2012, 07:52 AM
~n/t~'s Avatar
~n/t~ ~n/t~ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriah View Post
I am interested in the subject of possible text conversations, which has not been brought up much in Holly's case.

911 calls contain recorded dialogue, so of course it would be helpful to hear them. But txt messaging is 'recorded' as well as many other forms of cell communication. E911 jumps to mind immediately, as well as all of the other services providers have available for their customers such as email, internet, GPS etc. Often a treasure trove in locating missing persons, and something that should be discussed imvho.

An E911 is almost as good as an EPIRB. Heck, it IS an EPIRB, essentially. Does this mean that Holly made no calls from her cell after...what point?
There's never been any mention of text messages as far as I know. We know Clint tried calling her on her cellphone that morning and according to him, it rang 5 times and went to voicemail.

That is the alleged last call. We don't know if Karen or anyone else tried calling her phone as well. One would assume family and friends tried as well but that was never revealed.

FWIW....it was never officially confirmed by LE that her cellphone was found and I don't believe her family confirmed it either. The only official item that was told to the public was the lunchbag or lunchbox.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ~n/t~ For This Useful Post:
  #530  
Old 06-30-2012, 08:23 AM
Oriah Oriah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~n/t~ View Post
There's never been any mention of text messages as far as I know. We know Clint tried calling her on her cellphone that morning and according to him, it rang 5 times and went to voicemail.

That is the alleged last call. We don't know if Karen or anyone else tried calling her phone as well. One would assume family and friends tried as well but that was never revealed.

FWIW....it was never officially confirmed by LE that her cellphone was found and I don't believe her family confirmed it either. The only official item that was told to the public was the lunchbag or lunchbox.
Yes.
I have always found that interesting, considering the usage of text messaging these days. Especially in environments where folks are often requested to turn off their phones or turn to vibrate, etc.. such as schools, during exams, libraries, public places, while driving- that sort of thing. Especially considering that in Holly's case there are a lot of teens/young adults communicating with one another, who tend to use txt messaging often.

I've been somewhat amazed that since Holly was abducted, no one has spoken up and said "I got a text from so-and-so".
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Oriah For This Useful Post:
  #531  
Old 06-30-2012, 08:35 AM
dejavoodoo64's Avatar
dejavoodoo64 dejavoodoo64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Noatak View Post
My opinions only, no facts here:

This case screams out- local yokel. I respect and do not necessarily disagree with even the most provocative posts of the past several days. There are many potential players in this case and some of the names can only be gleaned by visiting other sites. Websleuths is ultimately the best crime-solving website because it has sensible oversight. But to get the complete flavor of this case you will need to review postings at some of the more anarchistic competing websites.

I somehow doubt that police investigated inside of Holly's home on the day she disappeared. I say this only for the reasons that such a search has never been confirmed by a family member OR law enforcement, to this day. Correct me if I am wrong about this detail.

There has been no official confirmation if ANYONE in Tennessee, who could realistically be related to this case, has taken a polygraph. Again, correct me if I am wrong about this statement.

I have identified multiple motives for the Holly Bobo case that would not be allowed on Websleuths. I have some areas to look, and these have been previously posted by me at this site. Since day one, I have been troubled by the potential number of wood-chipper machines in the area.
I agree with you 100%. You have to pick thru other places for little bits here and there. I posted something last night that looking back I probably shouldn't have, but it was read at several places and at far enough times apart that I didn't believe it was someone going from site to site posting the same thing. JMO
  #532  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:10 AM
Mysterylover Mysterylover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carla Lashelle View Post
To me the rumor makes zero sense...

Why cover up an accident and make it look like an abduction.

And, the time frame of a half an hour between screams and the cops showing up is still not enough time to clean up a crime scene, hide a body etc.
Just too fantastic and implausible IMHO.
Accidents can and do happen all the time but I can't see hiding one and carrying on a charade for over a year.
Carla L, IMO, An argument gone bad...and her body would prove it was NO accident.
__________________

‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’..
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds...What I write here, are my theories, speculation, opinions & deductive reasoning...not to be taken as 'fact'..
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mysterylover For This Useful Post:
  #533  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:26 AM
Mysterylover Mysterylover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 901
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisperer View Post
According to the KISS theory..one could assume, DS got there and was angry, they got into an argument and things went downhill from there.
The family cannot accept that DS would harm Holly and have made the pieces fit a stranger.
That is the stripped down version and frankly makes more sense than any other.
Whisperer, Simple is generally correct.
I agree with everyone that has knowedge of hunting turkey.
You would get in the woods in the dark early morning, around 5:00 AM.
Not at 7:00 am and Not at 7:30 am....How long a drive was it from grandmothers property to the B.'s???or to where he worked??

My question has always been: where was he when he made all those calls??...possibly in his vehicle...in route, in their driveway or where??
__________________

‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’..
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds...What I write here, are my theories, speculation, opinions & deductive reasoning...not to be taken as 'fact'..
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mysterylover For This Useful Post:
  #534  
Old 06-30-2012, 01:48 PM
Chili Fries Chili Fries is offline
Man Sleuth
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rural Alabama
Posts: 2,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Almondjoy View Post
Am I missing something? This video seems to make it very clear that Holly's car was parked in the detached garage to which she is pointing. The attached garage, with doors closed, is behind her when she is pointing out to where Holly's car was that day! The video also has a quick but good shot of the back door Clint was looking out when he saw her walk into the woods. There is also good perspective for the distance from the back door to the spot where she entered the woods. If you stop the video at 38 and 40 seconds, you can see some of this detail.
You are confused about your orientation. Karen is pointing to the carport that is attached to the house. If you look at the other picture I posted, of her farther away from the house showing where Holly entered the woods, you can use the pool to orient yourself. The pool is next to the house. Here is a pic that may help you:



The attached carport that Karen is pointing to, where Holly's car was parked the day she went missing, is at the bottom right of the house in this picture.

The garage you are talking about with the doors closed is detached.

Here is a video with some good overhead shots that will also help with your orientation.


You can see the detached garage at about 2:08 of the video.

Last edited by Chili Fries; 06-30-2012 at 04:13 PM.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chili Fries For This Useful Post:
  #535  
Old 06-30-2012, 01:49 PM
Chili Fries Chili Fries is offline
Man Sleuth
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rural Alabama
Posts: 2,489
Also, I posted above that the detached garage was built since Holly went missing. I was WRONG about that, it was there last April.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chili Fries For This Useful Post:
  #536  
Old 06-30-2012, 02:53 PM
Frogzilla's Avatar
Frogzilla Frogzilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 458
IMO, EVERYONE should watch the video that Chili posted. It has some interesting visuals of the property and the how narrow those local roads are. The date of the video is April 17 (4 days after the kidnapping) and in the interview, Pat Brown summed it up quite well by saying the evidence doesn't match the story. It never has.
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Frogzilla For This Useful Post:
  #537  
Old 06-30-2012, 04:09 PM
Carla Lashelle's Avatar
Carla Lashelle Carla Lashelle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysterylover View Post
Carla L, IMO, An argument gone bad...and her body would prove it was NO accident.
with who?

There is no credible (or any) evidence Holly had an argument with anyone.

There is still the matter of the time frame which, for the most part, does NOT involve anything Clint has said. Neighbor heard screams around 7:30 and cops get there around 8 based on independent 911 calls from Holly's mom and the neighbor.

How these unknown suspects with no planning could cover up any and all evidence of this "accidental death that wasn't an accident" makes no sense to me. And this theory totally discounts other statements and findings from LE that confirm an abduction (like the sheriff saying they had found the location where HOLLY AND THE SUSPECT/THEY had entered the woods. We know other items and clues were found also, which supports the abduction story. We know there was a search and I think they found some item outside of Holly's school, which would not have happened if this were some other crime.

Might as well been a killer unicorn or leprechaun, I suppose...
__________________
Lashelle


"Remember, They will never buy the cow if they can get the eggs for free! " ... Kelly Bundy
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Carla Lashelle For This Useful Post:
  #538  
Old 06-30-2012, 04:12 PM
Carla Lashelle's Avatar
Carla Lashelle Carla Lashelle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 2,193
People still confuse the layout of the back of the house and the "garage" at this late date.

Holly's car was parked behind the house, up under that roof area. There is a free standing "shed" type deal in the back yard NOT attached to the house, that has NOTHING to do with anything.

Based on what Clint said on the JVM interview the blood was found at the back of the house, under the overhang in some proximity to the car. Descriptions by various news sources have been vague about it but Clint said he found the blood where Holly and the suspect were kneeling down "in the garage".
__________________
Lashelle


"Remember, They will never buy the cow if they can get the eggs for free! " ... Kelly Bundy
The Following User Says Thank You to Carla Lashelle For This Useful Post:
  #539  
Old 06-30-2012, 04:15 PM
wfgodot's Avatar
wfgodot wfgodot is offline
chien méchant
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carla Lashelle View Post
Might as well been a killer unicorn or leprechaun, I suppose...
snip-snip bold

Hey, those are my working theories!
__________________
We are, I know not how, double in ourselves, so that what we believe we disbelieve, and cannot rid ourselves of what we condemn. (Michel de Montaigne)
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wfgodot For This Useful Post:
  #540  
Old 06-30-2012, 10:36 PM
dejavoodoo64's Avatar
dejavoodoo64 dejavoodoo64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 326
Well please do not take this as being dramatic. I can't post it as it would have to be classified as rumor. It was apparently never reported to LE and was never in the media, so documenting can't be done. I'll just say there is rumored to be a family dynamic and history that needs to be explored IMO. I would really like to see it cleared up, but that would require some very close friends or family to speak up as they would have had to notice. After this long I don't see that happening. I agree what has been posted about a shooting is unlikely, but the original story doesn't seem much more likely. All we know is she is missing and there was a lunchbox found. Papers and other evidence were not reported as fact as far as I know. If she was bleeding and went into the woods I will never believe search dogs couldn't have tracked. If there were papers and other evidence in the woods then someone must have planted them there, because it's apparent to me that she didn't enter the woods. As far as that goes I doubt she would be carrying that stuff anyway. The abductor wanted to leave a trail? Doubtful. JMO of course.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dejavoodoo64 For This Useful Post:
  #541  
Old 06-30-2012, 10:52 PM
cluciano63's Avatar
cluciano63 cluciano63 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 32,734
If we are all still alive a decade or two from now...I fear this case will be just as mystifying and may gain fame only by being one of the weirdest missing persons cases ever...
__________________
Just my opinion, of course.
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cluciano63 For This Useful Post:
  #542  
Old 06-30-2012, 10:58 PM
~n/t~'s Avatar
~n/t~ ~n/t~ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogzilla View Post
IMO, EVERYONE should watch the video that Chili posted. It has some interesting visuals of the property and the how narrow those local roads are. The date of the video is April 17 (4 days after the kidnapping) and in the interview, Pat Brown summed it up quite well by saying the evidence doesn't match the story. It never has.
Considering it allegedly took LE 10 minutes to get to the property would they have passed a vehicle if Holly was taken by vehicle? Would it be one road leading to their property?

I've never heard of a case where the story was "amended" or "revised".....and that was the first time. It has been amended or revised at least 2 or 3 times since that video.

This is the most bizarre case ever, imo.

Last edited by ~n/t~; 06-30-2012 at 11:44 PM.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ~n/t~ For This Useful Post:
  #543  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:08 PM
~n/t~'s Avatar
~n/t~ ~n/t~ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriah View Post
Yes.
I have always found that interesting, considering the usage of text messaging these days. Especially in environments where folks are often requested to turn off their phones or turn to vibrate, etc.. such as schools, during exams, libraries, public places, while driving- that sort of thing. Especially considering that in Holly's case there are a lot of teens/young adults communicating with one another, who tend to use txt messaging often.

I've been somewhat amazed that since Holly was abducted, no one has spoken up and said "I got a text from so-and-so".
Right. Apparently, word got out and everyone already knew somehow. The school knew. Holly's best friend knew. Her teacher knew. They both cried in class when Holly didn't show up at 8 am for her exam.

I guess there is no need for text messaging in Darden, TN.

Ironic isn't it? Everyone knew about her disappearance immediately but over a year later nobody knows anything.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ~n/t~ For This Useful Post:
  #544  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:09 PM
eileenhawkeye eileenhawkeye is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by cluciano63 View Post
If we are all still alive a decade or two from now...I fear this case will be just as mystifying and may gain fame only by being one of the weirdest missing persons cases ever...
I remember when this case first broke, there were thousands of people out searching for Holly (and this is a rural area, so it had to be a big % of the population) and now there's nothing about the case, and there's been nothing for months.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to eileenhawkeye For This Useful Post:
  #545  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:34 PM
SmoothOperator's Avatar
SmoothOperator SmoothOperator is offline
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that there's a victim@the heart of each
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,572
I'm confused(quite possibly just misunderstanding, tho) so I wanted to have someone clarify my point of confusion/misunderstanding.. It's regarding the upthread discussion about the free standing, completely unattached building that's been referred to as a separate two stall garage/carport, as well as a shed or storage space.. My opinion was always that it was a 2 stall, 3 sides enclosed, with open front carport.. And to my knowledge it has always been present on the Bobo property, out back(as the attached image shows below).. ATLEAST it has been there prior to April 13, 2011 as is seen on multiple different listings such as property records, real estate sites such as zillow, google/bing maps, etc..

So, is this what is being referred to upthread as having been built onto the Bobo property at some point after April 13, 2011?.. I believe it was chilie fries that mentioned a structure having been erected on the property at some point in this last year.. I am quite likely mistaken in my understanding it to have been this carport, free standing structure that's at the back of the property, that was referred to as newly built(within the last year).. But that's what I thought was being referred to..

Anyone who can please correct me where it is I'm obviously confused or misunderstanding.... TIA..

And what structure or building has been newly erected since Holly's abduction??

Again thanks to whoever can clear this up for me..
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1341113598.304501.jpg


____________________...
Posting via mobile as well as via tablet so plz forgive all typos.. Btwn the sucky touch keyboard and the obsessive auto-correct it's a big ol' mess
__________________
The quickest way to become a fool is to argue with one..
  #546  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:44 PM
Plumeria5's Avatar
Plumeria5 Plumeria5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: where orchids grow on trees
Posts: 3,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoothOperator View Post
I'm confused(quite possibly just misunderstanding, tho) so I wanted to have someone clarify my point of confusion/misunderstanding.. It's regarding the upthread discussion about the free standing, completely unattached building that's been referred to as a separate two stall garage/carport, as well as a shed or storage space.. My opinion was always that it was a 2 stall, 3 sides enclosed, with open front carport.. And to my knowledge it has always been present on the Bobo property, out back(as the attached image shows below).. ATLEAST it has been there prior to April 13, 2011 as is seen on multiple different listings such as property records, real estate sites such as zillow, google/bing maps, etc..

So, is this what is being referred to upthread as having been built onto the Bobo property at some point after April 13, 2011?.. I believe it was chilie fries that mentioned a structure having been erected on the property at some point in this last year.. I am quite likely mistaken in my understanding it to have been this carport, free standing structure that's at the back of the property, that was referred to as newly built(within the last year).. But that's what I thought was being referred to..

Anyone who can please correct me where it is I'm obviously confused or misunderstanding.... TIA..

And what structure or building has been newly erected since Holly's abduction??

Again thanks to whoever can clear this up for me..
Attachment 24165


____________________...
Posting via mobile as well as via tablet so plz forgive all typos.. Btwn the sucky touch keyboard and the obsessive auto-correct it's a big ol' mess
I think Chili Fries, in a later post, said she was mistaken. That structure was there at the time of Holly's disappearance.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Plumeria5 For This Useful Post:
  #547  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:47 PM
~n/t~'s Avatar
~n/t~ ~n/t~ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17,140
Chili clarified her post.
The Following User Says Thank You to ~n/t~ For This Useful Post:
  #548  
Old 07-01-2012, 05:50 AM
Whisperer's Avatar
Whisperer Whisperer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Francisco, Penninsula
Posts: 17,662
How in the world did Clint see them kneeling in the attached carport/garage? If both cars were there, that's a tight fit. How could he see them w/o being outside? If somebody was kneeling between two vehicles, that should have sent him out there pronto. Exactly where was Clint watching them, kneeling, sitting, etc. If true, this tells me his car was not in that garage as claimed.
The Following User Says Thank You to Whisperer For This Useful Post:
  #549  
Old 07-01-2012, 06:12 AM
SmoothOperator's Avatar
SmoothOperator SmoothOperator is offline
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that there's a victim@the heart of each
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,572
Thanks I obviously should've kept reading instead of popping in and out.. thanks
__________________
The quickest way to become a fool is to argue with one..
  #550  
Old 07-01-2012, 10:32 AM
MizStery's Avatar
MizStery MizStery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bellevue,Washington
Posts: 429
This interview was conducted April 20,2011. Pat Brown, asks the same questions then..... that we are puzzling over to this day.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP.../20/ng.01.html

PAT BROWN, CRIMINAL PROFILER, AUTHOR OF "THE PROFILER": Well, Deborah, you certainly can`t ignore something like that. I mean we see people repeat MOs, and if these MOs are similar, that`s going to go right up on the radar.*

But what I think what everybody is having so much trouble with in these cases is all the evasiveness. The evasiveness from the family, the evasiveness from the brother, the evasiveness from the police. And we`re not getting answers. Things are just -- seem like we should be able to get answers to, like when was the 911 call made? Did the dogs find a trail into the woods?*

I mean if her blood is out there spattered somewhere, and it`s her blood, which
are not going to tell us either, why wouldn`t the dogs follow that trail to the woods?

Then we also have the lunchbox problem. I mean if you have somebody dragging a women into the woods, why does her lunchbox which should be in her hand show up eight miles away? I don`t think she`s going to be clutching it
for eight miles of walking the woods. It doesn`t even make sense.*

NORVILLE: Do you think that`s a red herring that the guy has planted?

BROWN: You know I think there`s a lot of things about this case that we don`t
know. I don`t know if there`s a staged crime going on here. I don`t know -- we just don`t have the information so that we can put things together and make sense.

But I think it`s extremely important for the family to come forth and be very open and the police as well because I think there`s some people out there searching and searching, wanting to find Holly, and they`re getting frustrated because they`re thinking, wait a minute, maybe we`re searching for no reason.*

And I don`t think they want to think that way. I think they want to find Holly. I think they want to bring her home. I think they want to know if there`s a true abductor. So they can go out there and do their best. I think they need to just be a little bit more open and help everybody out here.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to MizStery For This Useful Post:
 

Bookmarks

Tags
+ holly bobo, abduction, camoflauge, darden, decatur county, henderson county, home invasion, no one is cleared, parsons, tbi, tennessee

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CA CA - Dwight Stallings, 22 months, Sacramento County, April 2011 summer_breeze Missing but not forgotten Discussion 31 05-27-2013 08:45 AM
TN - Holly Bobo, 20 yrs old, Decatur County, 13 April 2011 MagnoliaMom Holly Bobo General Discussion Threads 103 05-21-2013 07:48 PM
FL FL - Patrick Real, 48, Jacksonville, 22 April 2011 CatFancier Missing but not forgotten Discussion 1 10-22-2012 12:11 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!