Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Current Events > Up to the Minute

Notices

Up to the Minute Breaking news happening right now! (This is not for crime news. Please post breaking crime in the "Crimes in the News" forum).


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2005, 11:41 AM
Jeana (DP) Jeana (DP) is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 27,155
Same Sex Malpractice Case Dismissed for Lack of Standing

This is a heartbreaking decision . .



Appeals court: Same-sex partner can't sue hospital for malpractice

NEW YORK (AP) A divided state appeals court ruled Thursday that a man cannot sue a Manhattan hospital for malpractice in the death of his longtime partner, saying it could not provide tacit approval of same-sex marriages.

The court overturned a judge's 2003 decision that John Langan, of Vermont, could sue St. Vincent's Hospital for alleged malpractice in the death of Neil C. Spicehandler.

The appeals court, in a 3-2 vote, decided that Langan had no standing to sue the hospital despite the couple's 2000 civil union in Vermont. Attorneys for Langan claimed the civil union gave him standing as a spouse to sue the hospital under New York law.

* * *

Adam Aronson, the attorney for Langan, criticized the decision and said he would discuss a possible appeal with his client.

"If this decision is allowed to stand, same-sex couples will be denied the very significant and important protections that all married heterosexual spouses can get," Aronson said. "And they will be denied those protections for no reason other than the fact they are gay."

* * *

Spicehandler, 41, died at St. Vincent's after he was struck by a car in Manhattan. In his lawsuit, Langan charged that errors in treatment led to Spicehandler's death from an embolism -- a blockage caused by a blood clot.

http://www.courttv.com/news/2005/1014/samesex_ap.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2005, 11:50 AM
IdahoMom IdahoMom is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,655
Wow, what a can of worms! What do you think about this, Jeana, from a legal perspective?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-14-2005, 11:53 AM
Jeana (DP) Jeana (DP) is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 27,155
I think they've got a pretty good chance of winning their appeal. At the very least it will go a long way towards showing people exactly what it is that has same sex couples fighting so hard to have their "unions" regognized as "legal marriages." Some people say its justg a piece of paper, why fight so hard to get it. They forget that the little piece of paper opens doors to them that heterosexual couples taken for granted.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-14-2005, 12:00 PM
IdahoMom IdahoMom is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeana (DP)
I think they've got a pretty good chance of winning their appeal. At the very least it will go a long way towards showing people exactly what it is that has same sex couples fighting so hard to have their "unions" regognized as "legal marriages." Some people say its justg a piece of paper, why fight so hard to get it. They forget that the little piece of paper opens doors to them that heterosexual couples taken for granted.
I agree. It's more than just making a political statement for alot of these couples. It's about being able to provide health insurance, name their partner on a life insurance policy, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-14-2005, 12:16 PM
Linda7NJ's Avatar
Linda7NJ Linda7NJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by IdahoMom
I agree. It's more than just making a political statement for alot of these couples. It's about being able to provide health insurance, name their partner on a life insurance policy, etc.
Gay people deserve to be just as miserable as married people, and of course enjoy the few perks that comes with it too!

I hope they win the appeal
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-14-2005, 12:59 PM
deanws deanws is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,409
I don't believe they will win.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-14-2005, 01:14 PM
jannuncutt jannuncutt is offline
jannuncutt
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 889
Quote:
Originally Posted by deandaniellws
I don't believe they will win.
Why not? I really hope that they win.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-14-2005, 06:24 PM
Nova Nova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Palm Springs
Posts: 18,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeana (DP)
I think they've got a pretty good chance of winning their appeal. At the very least it will go a long way towards showing people exactly what it is that has same sex couples fighting so hard to have their "unions" regognized as "legal marriages." Some people say its justg a piece of paper, why fight so hard to get it. They forget that the little piece of paper opens doors to them that heterosexual couples taken for granted.
Exactly. Great post.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-14-2005, 07:20 PM
deanws deanws is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by jannuncutt
Why not? I really hope that they win.
I don't think the judicial system will approve it. I won't give an opinion about which side I want to win.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-14-2005, 07:55 PM
Jeana (DP) Jeana (DP) is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 27,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by deandaniellws
I don't think the judicial system will approve it. I won't give an opinion about which side I want to win.

It was 3/2. That's pretty damn good odds.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-14-2005, 08:06 PM
tennessee tennessee is offline
Blew out my flipflop. Stepped on a pop top . . .
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,034
I hope that this case will go forward. It is past time to give these couples the same rights as their heterosexual counterparts.



JMHO
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-14-2005, 08:08 PM
deanws deanws is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeana (DP)
It was 3/2. That's pretty damn good odds.
But not good enough to make it happen. I am sure we will all be keeping an eye on this case. Sad story.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-14-2005, 08:22 PM
Jeana (DP) Jeana (DP) is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 27,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by deandaniellws
But not good enough to make it happen. I am sure we will all be keeping an eye on this case. Sad story.

Round one.
Hopefully, the justices on the next step have bigger balls.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-14-2005, 09:21 PM
deanws deanws is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeana (DP)
Round one.
Hopefully, the justices on the next step have bigger balls.
This will be a ground breaking case...no matter which way it falls. It is definitely a case to keep up with.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!