 |
|

08-30-2008, 11:27 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,130
|
|
Hi
I agree I should.Maybe I can one day.We called the FDLE in to investigate her case in 1997 and nothing became of it.They were recently called in again.So the FDLE and the CBPD are reinvestigating her case again.So I pray they find out something this time.I mean it's really been too long.
suzanne
Last edited by Ms Suzanne; 08-30-2008 at 01:38 PM.
|

08-30-2008, 10:33 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 192
|
|
|
Suzanne,
Hope that the FDLE/CBPD does find some answers finally. I grew up in Fort Lauderdale and remember her case since I was a kid. I understand that you are not of the opinion that Christopher Wilder was involved, but it made me think of something. Wilder was known to travel long distances, many times out of the Florida state line. When a criminal crosses state lines to commit an abduction, murder, etc., like Wilder did, then the FBI can be brought into a case (or just take it over). Was the FBI ever involved in Tammy's case? It seems that the FDLE has bungled a lot of investigations in the past. Also, with Tammy being in the film/modeling industry, was or has there ever been any attempt to use any contacts in her films/career for publicity regarding her case, such as any Scarface actors, directors, or agents who may have some clout for public appeals/commercials/news broadcast? Just some thoughts. All the best...
|

08-30-2008, 11:00 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,130
|
|
|
Hi
Oh,I don't know.I hope they are doing all that this time.
suzanne
|

08-31-2008, 01:06 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 590
|
|
|
Suzanne, I really hope you find your sister someday. I first learned of her story when I was a kid while watching Unsolved Mysteries. I think of her often, and hope some answers will come to light one day.
|

08-31-2008, 09:59 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,130
|
|
|
Hi
Thankyou.
suzanne
|

08-31-2008, 02:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
I thought it might be helpful to post any does that have been looked into, need to be looked into and especially those that have been ruled out. (I was finding it hard to keep everything committed to memory while looking through the databases). This way we won't be bugging you with already known info and we can focus on stuff that hasn't been looked into. I took info from this thread. Did I miss any?
Tammy's Doe Network case file number is 211DFFL.
16UFLA - ?
125UFNV - too tall?
335UFOH - ruled out through dna
55UFTX - ruled out through dna
554UFL - ruled out, gap in teeth
5223UFFL - don't think it's her but no DNA done
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

08-31-2008, 03:21 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,130
|
|
|
Hi
Thankyou.They say my DNA is in CODIS and if there is DNA on the Jane Doe and it is in CODIS it will come up as a hit(A match)if it is tammy.
suzanne
|

08-31-2008, 03:33 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
|
this is probably a newbie question... do most new does have their DNA put into CODIS or does it vary from state to state?
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

08-31-2008, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,130
|
|
|
Hi
Alot of the older cases of Jane Does are not.They are just starting to do this.In older cases they are having to go and exhume the remains to get DNA on thier Jane Doe.I hope they are putting this in CODIS.I assume they are.
suzanne
|

08-31-2008, 05:59 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
okay, i'll keep looking through all the old ones then... maybe i'll see something that someone else missed. i'm just going through doe network state by state. i'll let you know if i find anything.
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

08-31-2008, 06:02 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,130
|
|
|
Hi
Thankyou.Can you please let me know any of the possible matches that don't have DNA on them?
suzanne
|

08-31-2008, 08:07 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 192
|
|
|
Suzanne,
Just going through some of the unidentified across the U.S. that fit Tammy's profile from the Doe Network that I think haven't been posted or looked into yet. These are from 1983-1989. Will be back online later tonight to check more...
Case File: 100UFOR
Case File 98UFWA
Hot Case 499
Hot Case 378
Case File 461UFPA
Hot Case 826
|

08-31-2008, 08:08 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
|
i'm going to copy and add those to my list with links so we can keep this straight.
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

08-31-2008, 08:09 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
I thought it might be helpful to post any does that have been looked into, need to be looked into and especially those that have been ruled out. (I was finding it hard to keep everything committed to memory while looking through the databases). This way we won't be bugging you with already known info and we can focus on stuff that hasn't been looked into. I took info from this thread. Did I miss any?
Tammy's Doe Network case file number is 211DFFL.
16UFLA - ?
125UFNV - too tall?
335UFOH - ruled out through dna
55UFTX - ruled out through dna
554UFL - ruled out, gap in teeth
5223UFFL - don't think it's her but no DNA done
100UFOR -
98UFWA -
HC499 -
HC378 -
461UFPA -
HC826 -
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
Last edited by Still_Snarky; 08-31-2008 at 11:01 PM.
Reason: adding links
|

08-31-2008, 08:31 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 192
|
|
|
S- That sounds like a good idea so there's no re-post, etc. After every post I'll copy and paste what has been posted/excluded as you've done.
|

08-31-2008, 09:22 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 192
|
|
|
Continued from above thread...
16UFLA - ?
125UFNV - too tall?
335UFOH - ruled out through dna
55UFTX - ruled out through dna
554UFL - ruled out, gap in teeth
5223UFFL - don't think it's her but no DNA done
100UFOR -
98UFWA -
HC499 -
HC378 -
461UFPA -
HC826 -
Case File 63UFCA-
Case File 101UFCA-
Case File 412UFFL-
Hot Case 690- little info/Canada-
Case File 572UFNC- height off-
Hot Case 173 - little info, age in range-
Case File 320UFCA- age,w,h, in range possibly-
Case File 591UFCA- little info, age in range-
Hot Case 219-
These are through 1995.
|

08-31-2008, 09:44 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
|
cool, i'll keep updating with the links...
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

08-31-2008, 11:01 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
Tammy's Doe Network case file number is 211DFFL.
16UFLA - ?
125UFNV - too tall?
335UFOH - ruled out through dna
55UFTX - ruled out through dna
554UFL - ruled out, gap in teeth
5223UFFL - don't think it's her but no DNA done
100UFOR -
98UFWA -
HC499 -
HC378 -
461UFPA -
HC826 -
63UFCA -
101UFCA -
412UFFL -
HC690 - (little info/Canada)
572UFNC - (height off)
HC173 - (little info, age in range)
320UFCA- (age,w,h, in range possibly)
591UFCA- (little info, age in range)
HC219 -
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

09-01-2008, 02:49 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 192
|
|
|
Continued (see above)
Tammy's Doe Network case file number is 211DFFL.
16UFLA - ?
125UFNV - too tall?
335UFOH - ruled out through dna
55UFTX - ruled out through dna
554UFL - ruled out, gap in teeth
5223UFFL - don't think it's her but no DNA done
100UFOR -
98UFWA -
HC499 -
HC378 -
461UFPA -
HC826 -
63UFCA -
101UFCA -
412UFFL -
HC690 - (little info/Canada)
572UFNC - (height off)
HC173 - (little info, age in range)
320UFCA- (age,w,h, in range possibly)
591UFCA- (little info, age in range)
HC219 -
Hot Case 202 (little info)
Case File 177UFIN (DNA Pending, doesn't seem likely)
Case File 222UFFL (age range 20-45/straight hair/unlikely)
Hot Case 663 (age 30+ est. in 2001, little info)
Hot Case 661 (gender unknown, remains at location very long, dentals available)
Case File 540UFNY (est. date of death 1980-90, age 25-55, little else)
Case File 331UFON (age 30-50, located in Canada, DNA: nuclear prof. avail.)
Hot Case 152 (age in range, deceased 1+ yrs, no DNA avail., located in Naples, FL)
Hot Case 469 (very little info, located in FL)
Case File 569UFOK (deceased 3-20 yrs when found, age est: late teens-late 20's, unlikely though from appearance, in CODIS)
Hot Case 1036 (DNA Pending, unknown race, age in range, shorter, little info, doubtful)
Hot Case 1024 (age, height in range, located in FL, doubtful)
Hope this helps...
|

09-02-2008, 10:16 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
Tammy's Doe Network case file number is 211DFFL.
Suzanne's comments are in RED. Our comments are in (parenthesis).
16UFLA - ?
125UFNV - too tall
335UFOH - ruled out through dna
55UFTX - ruled out through dna
554UFFL - ruled out, gap in teeth
523UFFL - don't think it's her but no DNA done
100UFOR - (likely victim of green river killer, unlikely)
98UFWA - (also a victim of green river killer, unlikely)
HC499 - (possibly gave birth or had late term abortion)
HC378 -
461UFPA -
HC826 -
63UFCA -
101UFCA -
412UFFL -
HC690 - (little info/Canada)
572UFNC - (height off)
HC173 - (little info, age in range)
320UFCA- (age,w,h, in range possibly)
591UFCA- (little info, age in range)
HC219 -
HC202 - (little info)
177UFIN - (DNA Pending, doesn't seem likely)
222UFFL - (age range 20-45/straight hair/unlikely) (has dna, would this have already been checked against Tammy's?)
HC663 - (age 30+ est. in 2001, little info)
HC661 - (gender unknown, remains at location very long, dentals available)
540UFNY - (est. date of death 1980-90, age 25-55, little else)
331UFON - (age 30-50, located in Canada, DNA: nuclear prof. avail.)
HC152 - (age in range, deceased 1+ yrs, no DNA avail., located in Naples, FL)
HC469 - (very little info, located in FL)
569UFOK - (deceased 3-20 yrs when found, age est: late teens-late 20's, unlikely though from appearance, in CODIS) (teeth make this look unlikely and if it's in CODIS it would've showed a match already right? Tammy is in CODIS?)
HC1036 - (DNA Pending, unknown race, age in range, shorter, little info, doubtful)
HC1024 - (age, height in range, located in FL, doubtful)
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

09-02-2008, 10:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
|
i was wondering...it was mentioned that tammy may have been three months pregnant? is there any more info about this? some of the does were pregnant at time of death, some show that they gave birth at some point. just wondering if that could have something to do with her disappearance or help rule out/in does...
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

09-08-2008, 01:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
|
suzanne are you still around?
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

09-08-2008, 01:29 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,130
|
|
|
Hi
Thankyou so much.They are not sure about her pregnancy.They are only checking DNA with tammy.They say if there was a match and the DNA of the Jane Doe is in CODIS it would come up as a hit(match)and none has so far.I don't think all Jane Does have DNA on them yet.Yes,I am still around.I am just getting my little girl in first grade and my little boy in kindergarten for the first time in school.It's very emotional for me.I miss them already.
suzanne
|

09-09-2008, 01:45 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: californ.i.a
Posts: 75
|
|
my oldest just started pre-k today.
i'll keep working...
__________________
"i'm not going to marry you. i'm going to EAT you."
|

09-11-2008, 07:36 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,571
|
|
|
On case 554UFFL, it says it isn't Tammy because of a "gap in the teeth." I didn't see a gap or read that there was one. Can someone tell me how they came to that conclusion?
The pictures really do resemble her.
Thanks
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| © Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 |
New To Site? |
Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|