Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > JonBenet Ramsey

Notices

JonBenet Ramsey What really happened to 6 year old JonBenet? Someone is getting away with murder. All information posted on this site is gained through published documentation on this case. It is strictly opinion only.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2004, 06:54 PM
candy candy is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 324
Interview w/ John Ramsey

http://www.detnews.com/2004/editoria.../a18-90821.htm

Sunday, March 14, 2004

John Ramsey leans toward becoming high-profile candidate for Michigan House

By George Weeks / The Detroit News

Businessman John Ramsey of Charlevoix undoubtedly will be this year’s highest-profile candidate for the Michigan House of Representatives.


-Just an opinon-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-14-2004, 07:28 PM
SisterSocks SisterSocks is offline
What a wild and crazy trip its been
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Don't mess with Texas
Posts: 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
http://www.detnews.com/2004/editoria.../a18-90821.htm

Sunday, March 14, 2004

John Ramsey leans toward becoming high-profile candidate for Michigan House

By George Weeks / The Detroit News

Businessman John Ramsey of Charlevoix undoubtedly will be this year’s highest-profile candidate for the Michigan House of Representatives.

Candy ---this just blows my mind. I guess what surprised the most, is that the article named his Wife as the owning a business???

Socks

Thanks for the link =)
__________________
Just my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2004, 07:51 PM
candy candy is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 324
In spite of the blurb Mr. Weeks quoted from Ramseys own book, here's the truth about John Ramsey's suspect status from Chief Beckner's deposition. (and it also puts lie to the BDI garbage)

17 Q So from start to today, you have not

18 classified any individual as a suspect?

19 A Publicly, correct.

20 Q Or otherwise?

21 A That's not accurate.

22 Q How is it inaccurate?

23 A Internally John and Patsy are considered

24 suspects.

25 Q Both of them?

64

1 A Yes.

2 Q Are considered to have probably been

3 involved in the death of their daughter?

4 A Probability, yes.

5 Q Has anyone else ever attained that status

6 of probably involved?

7 A No.


-Just an opinion
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2004, 11:37 PM
Shylock Shylock is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
"Internally John and Patsy are considered suspects."
Somebody please forward this to whomever is running against John Ramsey!
Murder suspects running for public office....sheeesh, what next.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-15-2004, 02:19 AM
BrotherMoon BrotherMoon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 753
John Ramsey had nothing to do with the death of his daughter. Let him run, let him prove his worthiness, and may the increase in exposure create a tripwire for Patsy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-15-2004, 02:58 AM
Blazeboy3 Blazeboy3 is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 776
Thanks for info/url...IMHO he's bought/sold "a puppet on a string"

Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
http://www.detnews.com/2004/editoria.../a18-90821.htm

Sunday, March 14, 2004

John Ramsey leans toward becoming high-profile candidate for Michigan House

By George Weeks / The Detroit News

Businessman John Ramsey of Charlevoix undoubtedly will be this year’s highest-profile candidate for the Michigan House of Representatives.


-Just an opinon-
Thanks for info/url...IMHO while reading the article, flashes of "being bought & sold" and "a puppet on a string" entertained my thoughts FWIW...LOL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-15-2004, 03:00 AM
Blazeboy3 Blazeboy3 is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 776
Interesting thought...but

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrotherMoon
John Ramsey had nothing to do with the death of his daughter. Let him run, let him prove his worthiness, and may the increase in exposure create a tripwire for Patsy.
Interesting thought...but when John married Patsy ... did the two not become ONE?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-15-2004, 08:48 AM
BlueCrab BlueCrab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
In spite of the blurb Mr. Weeks quoted from Ramseys own book, here's the truth about John Ramsey's suspect status from Chief Beckner's deposition. (and it also puts lie to the BDI garbage)

17 Q So from start to today, you have not

18 classified any individual as a suspect?

19 A Publicly, correct.

20 Q Or otherwise?

21 A That's not accurate.

22 Q How is it inaccurate?

23 A Internally John and Patsy are considered

24 suspects.

25 Q Both of them?

64

1 A Yes.

2 Q Are considered to have probably been

3 involved in the death of their daughter?

4 A Probability, yes.

5 Q Has anyone else ever attained that status

6 of probably involved?

7 A No.


-Just an opinion
Candy,

By Colorado law, Burke cannot be referred to as a suspect or probably involved by Beckner, or Keenan, nor anyone else of authority in Boulder, which might be implied that Burke killed JonBenet. Burke is protected by his age at the time of the crime, which was nine. Officially, in Colorado it's as if no crime had occurred if the perp is under 10 years old. Burke made it by four weeks.

IMO Burke was lucky he lived in Colorado at the time. Twenty seven states have no minimum age for a child to be tried criminally as an adult. The remainder of the states have minimum ages ranging from 15 in Louisiana down to 7 years old in New York.

JMO
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-15-2004, 09:28 AM
candy candy is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 324
5 Q Has anyone else ever attained that status

6 of probably involved?

7 A No.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-15-2004, 10:02 AM
Toth Toth is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 972
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueCrab
By Colorado law, Burke cannot be referred to as a suspect or probably involved by Beckner, or Keenan, nor anyone else of authority in Boulder, which might be implied that Burke killed JonBenet.
He can not be prosecuted or adjudged a juvenile delinquent in need of supervision, but the cops and DA could say in reference to anyone who was then nine years old 'he did it'. They just can't say 'he did it and he is under arrest for it'. If he had been ten, they could have said 'he did it' and when brought to court he will be referred to as 'The Juvenile alleged to be in need of supervision'' in all court papers.

but all this tiresome Burke Did It stuff is not only nonsense its off topic. What does it have to do with John Ramsey running for public office in Michigan?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-15-2004, 10:43 AM
BlueCrab BlueCrab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
5 Q Has anyone else ever attained that status

6 of probably involved?

7 A No.

Candy,

Beckner had to say "no". If he had said "yes" it would have made Burke an "internal" suspect who was PROBABLY involved in the death of JonBenet. That would violate the law and the court's protective order covering Burke.

Beckner and Keenan are forced to do a lot of broken field running to try to answer questions about Burke and in the same breath protect his anonymous identity as a child under 10 years old at the time of the crime.

In such instances it is perfectly legal to lie under oath in order to follow the law and a court order protecting a minor's identity. Beckner had no choice but to say "no".

JMO
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-15-2004, 11:16 AM
Toth Toth is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 972
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueCrab
In such instances it is perfectly legal to lie under oath in order to follow the law and a court order protecting a minor's identity.
Your interpretation of the law regarding perjury is very interesting. I do so hope that if you are ever testifying under oath you gain a better understanding prior to giving your testimony. If you don't you are likely going to have seven years to study the matter.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-15-2004, 11:30 AM
candy candy is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 324
Thumbs up

Right on Toth!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-15-2004, 01:11 PM
Kim Ii Kim Ii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Bay, California
Posts: 1,268
I agree with Toth on this one, Blue...sorry. Under no circumstances, EVER...is it permissable to lie under oath...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-15-2004, 01:44 PM
BlueCrab BlueCrab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim Ii
I agree with Toth on this one, Blue...sorry. Under no circumstances, EVER...is it permissable to lie under oath...
I agree. But you are looking at the academic interpretation of perjury. In the real world, in such matters as laws protecting the identity of children, national security matters, etc., a lie can be the lesser of two evils and will be forgiven by the court.

IMO Beckner was caught between a rock and a hard place. If he had said "yes" the next question would have been "who". He would have violated a court protective order because the only other known person in the house that night was Burke, and at least one of those three Ramseys had to have been involved in the murder. So he said "no", John and Patsy were the only two "internal" suspects. Beckner would have violated the law if he answered 'yes" and would have violated the law if he answered "no".

JMO
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-15-2004, 01:47 PM
Nehemiah Nehemiah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern US
Posts: 1,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SisterSocks
Candy ---this just blows my mind. I guess what surprised the most, is that the article named his Wife as the owning a business???

Socks

Thanks for the link =)
Socks, the article said "co-owned by his wife".

IMO
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-15-2004, 02:14 PM
Kim Ii Kim Ii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Bay, California
Posts: 1,268
Sorry, Blue, in the "real" world, perjury's perjury, period. I used to work as a Legal Assistant for years (litigation). My hubby, a lawyer, has also stated that perjury is against the law, no matter what the circumstances...

Seems to me you're trying to twist the law to suit your theory regarding this case. I've re-read all of the books on this case, all of the info. I could glean on the Internet, and I've turned myself around on the BDI theory. Burke was never, ever, considered a suspect, by Steve Thomas or anyone else, and that includes those that feel the family had something to do with JonBenet's death. He's never been considered a suspect...I think it's time to lay to rest the Burke did it theory. Sorry Blue...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-15-2004, 02:57 PM
candy candy is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 324
New Interview with John Ramsey

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michi...7654350750.xml

AP Interview: John Ramsey says he wants to give back to community

By JOHN FLESHER
The Associated Press
3/15/2004, 1:59 p.m. ET

CHARLEVOIX, Mich. (AP) — John Ramsey says he is seriously considering a campaign for the Michigan House and hopes voters will focus on his ideas and experience, rather than the unsolved murder of his daughter JonBenet.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-15-2004, 03:27 PM
Barbara Barbara is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 741
Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
New Interview with John Ramsey

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michi...7654350750.xml

AP Interview: John Ramsey says he wants to give back to community

By JOHN FLESHER
The Associated Press
3/15/2004, 1:59 p.m. ET

CHARLEVOIX, Mich. (AP) — John Ramsey says he is seriously considering a campaign for the Michigan House and hopes voters will focus on his ideas and experience, rather than the unsolved murder of his daughter JonBenet.
Sure they will.............sure...... just like they focused on Gary Condit's ideas and experience, rather than the unsolved murder of Chandra Levy....and HE actually had ideas AND experience!
__________________
This is my opinion only
This post may not be copied to any other forum

God Bless America
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-15-2004, 04:09 PM
Ivy Ivy is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,199
John might look kinda funny sitting in one of these in the House chambers.

imo
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-15-2004, 04:26 PM
BlueCrab BlueCrab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim Ii
Sorry, Blue, in the "real" world, perjury's perjury, period. I used to work as a Legal Assistant for years (litigation). My hubby, a lawyer, has also stated that perjury is against the law, no matter what the circumstances...

Seems to me you're trying to twist the law to suit your theory regarding this case. I've re-read all of the books on this case, all of the info. I could glean on the Internet, and I've turned myself around on the BDI theory. Burke was never, ever, considered a suspect, by Steve Thomas or anyone else, and that includes those that feel the family had something to do with JonBenet's death. He's never been considered a suspect...I think it's time to lay to rest the Burke did it theory. Sorry Blue...
Sorry Kim Ii, I guess you didn't read the right books. If I'm close to being right about my BDI theory, then Burke's juvenile records are sealed and NO ONE of authority can divulge that information, even under oath during a deposition, without approval by the court. IOW, they can legally lie under oath.

Colorado Children's Code (under age 18):

"Persons who have had their juvenile records sealed may lawfully and properly reply that no such record exists. However, the record is still available to the district attorney, law enforcement, the courts, and the department of human services. Government agencies cannot show the records to anyone without an order from the court."

Burke's juvenile records have been sealed since the grand jury disbanded in 1999.

JMO
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-16-2004, 03:20 AM
Shylock Shylock is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by candy
AP Interview: John Ramsey says he wants to give back to community
If Ramsey wants to give back to a community, he can start by paying back the city of Boulder for all the money they spent investigating his faux-crime.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-16-2004, 03:36 AM
BrotherMoon BrotherMoon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 753
BlueCrab, why do you claim knowledge of the real world?

Nehemiah, that wasn't very nice, pointing out a mistake by SSocks. Weve hu awone.

I hope he does run and win, the more Patsy gets exposure the better.

Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to election day. (We need a singing smiley.)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-16-2004, 11:32 AM
candy candy is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 324


http://www.record-eagle.com/2004/mar/16ramsey.htm
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-16-2004, 11:58 AM
BrotherMoon BrotherMoon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 753
"I'm not afraid of dying like I used to be, because wherever JonBenet went, that's where I'm going."

Like I said, fear of death compensated by fantasy. Gee Patsy, have you also been SAVED, DELIVERED and will you share in John's VICTORY? Are you and John perhaps fulfilling the meaning of Psalms 118, self sacrifice, by giving back to "the community"?

The above quote is the motive, btw. Patsy will continue to "explain", just like she did in DOI.

I wonder, on inauguration day, will she wear purple?

"Wherever we go, whatever we do, we're gonna go through it together." (Again, we need a singing smiley.)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!