Brooke Bennett, 12 years old Randolph VT #20

christine2448 · #1 07-12-2008, 02:43 PM

Please continue GENERAL discussions here. Look around BROOKE'S FORUM there are several threads started on specific topics to try and stay organized.

I advise everyone to read the RULES of WS, Long and Short Version and also to read THIS STICKY before participating. TIA.

Links to previous and similar threads can be found toward the bottom of the page.

Welcome all newbies!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am sad such a tragedy is bringing us all together.

Tom'sGirl · #2 07-12-2008, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christine2448

Please continue GENERAL discussions here.

TY christine!

philamena · #3 07-12-2008, 02:49 PM

Great,

I just lost a longgg post. lol
Again, AR has been a victim, of sexual abuse since the age of 8.
It is against the TOS to bash her and I am not afraid to hit the alert button.

How dare people HERE question if Brooke was sexually active.
Wt is wrong with people? She was only12 years old.

Do gossip mongers have a son or daughter 12 years old?? Think about it.

I find this infuriating.

My comments are regarding post made yesterday.

Tom'sGirl · #4 07-12-2008, 02:51 PM

Quote:

There is something off with the entire mugshot thing. The only thing I can figure is that the Feds do not want someone(s) to see his face and tip them off. If RG was involved someway in a larger operation, he may not have used his real name...but people might recognize his face, react and get rid of their computers, drives, etc.

Something is way off, hopefully we will learn the "why" soon!

Hailiejade77 · #5 07-12-2008, 02:55 PM

And it was on July 12th MJ was convicted, two years prior to Brookes birth
Conviction Information

Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction 07-12-1993

* AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT
* KIDNAPPING

OMG,.. I didn't even realize that two years before her birthday he was convicted!

Tom'sGirl · #6 07-12-2008, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hailiejade77

And it was on July 12th MJ was convicted, two years prior to Brookes birth
Conviction Information

Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction 07-12-1993

* AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT
* KIDNAPPING

OMG,.. I didn't even realize that two years before her birthday he was convicted!

Yes, I guess I could have not mentioned that, but it was listed on his Vermont Registry records that no longer are there!

Here is what WAS there:
http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/servlet/SOR?id=X000005393

VERMONT SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
INFORMATION

State of Vermont | Vermont Department of Public Safety | Division of Criminal Justice Services
Registry Detail

(http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/images/X000005393.jpeg)

Registrant Information

Name: JACQUES,MICHAEL STEPHEN
Date of Birth: 03-18-1966
City: RANDOLPH CENTER
Sex: M
Race: W
Height: 5 feet 08 inches
Weight: 150 lbs
Eye Color: BLU
Hair Color: BRO

Treatment Status: COMPLIANT
Wanted: NO

Reason For Internet Posting
Conviction For Aggravated Sexual Assault

Department Of Corrections
Supervising Office & Phone#
No longer supervised for sexual crime

Conviction Information
Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT 07-12-1993
KIDNAPPING 07-12-1993

Vermont Sex Offender Registry Home Page
Department of Public Safety Home | State of Vermont Home Page | Email Webmaster
Copyright 2004 The Vermont Department of Public Safety - All rights reserved -
Database as of: Jun 28 2008 at 01:00 am

LaLaw2000 · #7 07-12-2008, 03:01 PM

It being Brooke's 13th birthday, I am so sorry she is not here to enjoy it. It is so sad.
Brooke was such an innocent victim.

Hailiejade, I hope it is next July 12 when MJ is convicted and sent to death row.

philamena · #8 07-12-2008, 03:03 PM

Has LE, a reporter, a local, a relative, anyone explained why no recent pictures of MG are available? What about his mug shot? I can't find a picture of him anywhere.

Hailiejade77 · #9 07-12-2008, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaLaw2000

It being Brooke's 13th birthday, I am so sorry she is not here to enjoy it. It is so sad.
Brooke was such an innocent victim.

Hailiejade, I hope it is next July 12 when MJ is convicted and sent to death row.

And then maybe another July 12th he will be PUT TO DEATH!

LaLaw2000 · #10 07-12-2008, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philamena

Has LE, a reporter, a local, a relative, anyone explained why no recent pictures of MG are available? What about his mug shot? I can't find a picture of him anywhere.

You mean RG?

I posted about RG before the new thread was started. I don't think I was supposed to - those posts should have been on the RG thread, I think.

Too many different threads! I did not mean to post where I may not should have!

LaLaw2000 · #11 07-12-2008, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hailiejade77

And then maybe another July 12th he will be PUT TO DEATH!

That would be great, IMO! And I am not usually even for the death penalty!

LaLaw2000 · #12 07-12-2008, 03:10 PM

[quote=Tom'sGirl;2375298]Yes, I guess I could have not mentioned that, but it was listed on his Vermont Registry records that no longer are there!

Here is what WAS there:
[font=verdana][font=verdana][font=verdana]http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/servlet/SOR?id=X000005393

VERMONT SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
INFORMATION

State of Vermont | Vermont Department of Public Safety | Division of Criminal Justice Services
Registry Detail

(http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/images/X000005393.jpeg)

Registrant Information

Name: JACQUES,MICHAEL STEPHEN
Date of Birth: 03-18-1966
City: RANDOLPH CENTER
Sex: M
Race: W
Height: 5 feet 08 inches
Weight: 150 lbs
Eye Color: BLU
Hair Color: BRO

Treatment Status: COMPLIANT
Wanted: NO

Reason For Internet Posting
Conviction For Aggravated Sexual Assault

Department Of Corrections
Supervising Office & Phone#
No longer supervised for sexual crime

Conviction Information
Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT 07-12-1993
KIDNAPPING 07-12-1993

Vermont Sex Offender Registry Home Page
Department of Public Safety Home | State of Vermont Home Page | Email Webmaster
Copyright 2004 The Vermont Department of Public Safety - All rights reserved -
Database as of: Jun 28 2008 at 01:00 am

Thanks, Tom'sGirl, for posting that. I had 'saved' that also, only to go back and see that it was gone.
Talk about travesty of justice! That POS was out walking free to be able to do even worse!

SeriouslySearching · #13 07-12-2008, 03:11 PM

It is hard to think that today is Brooke's Birthday.

philamena · #14 07-12-2008, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaLaw2000

You mean RG?

I posted about RG before the new thread was started. I don't think I was supposed to - those posts should have been on the RG thread, I think.

Too many different threads! I did not mean to post where I may not should have!

Now honey you did just fine.

I'm trying to play catch up from yesterday.

Tom'sGirl · #15 07-12-2008, 03:14 PM

[quote]

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaLaw2000;2375316 Thanks, Tom'sGirl, for posting that. I had 'saved' that also, only to go back and see that it was gone.
Talk about travesty of justice! That POS was out walking free to be able to do even worse![/quote

I have put the info. into the MJ thread also.

SeriouslySearching · #16 07-12-2008, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom'sGirl

Something is way off, hopefully we will learn the "why" soon!

Yes, it is way off. It reminds me of the Stacy Peterson case and LE hiding Tom...but the difference is that we know Tom is a state's witness. Are they going to let Ray Gagnon walk on this if he gives them the information that will put MJ up to face the DP?!

philamena · #17 07-12-2008, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaLaw2000

SNIP

Here is what WAS there:
[font=verdana][font=verdana][font=verdana]http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/servlet/SOR?id=X000005393

I wonder if we will ever know how many innocent lives he's ruined! What a creep.
IMO The state of Vermont made a huge mistake when it freed this predator.

SeriouslySearching · #18 07-12-2008, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philamena

I wonder if we will ever know how many innocent lives he's ruined! What a creep.
IMO The state of Vermont made a huge mistake when it freed this predator.

Very true, Philamena. (I like your siggy!)

philamena · #19 07-12-2008, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeriouslySearching

Yes, it is way off. It reminds me of the Peterson case and LE hiding Tom...but the difference is that we know Tom is a state's witness. Are they going to let Ray Gagnon walk on this if he gives them the information that will put MJ up to face the DP?!

Let's hope not.
Imo, RG is in this up to his eyeballs.
He knew what the creep was going to do to Brooke...he's an accessary after the fact if not someone who allowed a 12 year old to be murdered.

philamena · #20 07-12-2008, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeriouslySearching

Very true, Philamena. (I like your siggy!)

Glad you like it SeriouslySearching.

LaLaw2000 · #21 07-12-2008, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philamena

Now honey you did just fine.

I'm trying to play catch up from yesterday.

Ty!

SeriouslySearching · #22 07-12-2008, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philamena

Great,

I just lost a longgg post. lol
Again, AR has been a victim, of sexual abuse since the age of 8.
It is against the TOS to bash her and I am not afraid to hit the alert button.

How dare people HERE question if Brooke was sexually active.
Wt is wrong with people? She was only12 years old.

Do gossip mongers have a son or daughter 12 years old?? Think about it.

I find this infuriating.

My comments are regarding post made yesterday.

I am guilty of doing that last night. I was just so angry at the whole situation. I know that AR is a victim and I know that she was once an innocent little girl just like Brooke. I know I am really just angry with MJ and RG. They are the reason these girls are where they are today. The day cannot come soon enough when they inject MJ and we finally see some justice for both girls. I guess we will have to be satisfied with RG rotting in jail. (Wonder if he will get longer than four years?!)

LaLaw2000 · #23 07-12-2008, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeriouslySearching

Yes, it is way off. It reminds me of the Peterson case and LE hiding Tom...but the difference is that we know Tom is a state's witness. Are they going to let Ray Gagnon walk on this if he gives them the information that will put MJ up to face the DP?!

That had better not happen! I do not think so, SS!

RG has, by his own admission downloaded thousands of CP images, and had a collection of Russian CP also of some children being as young as 5 years old!
THEN LE and FBI found where he had taken CP to his house in Alabama from Texas before going on to Vermont.

Maybe Gagnon has agreed to showing the FBI some of those sites where he had downloaded CP, tho. IMO, there is too much he HAS done for LE or FBI to let him walk! A reduced sentence, maybe. IMO only.

(is it okay to post this on this thread?)

LaLaw2000 · #24 07-12-2008, 03:34 PM

I am going over to read all of the threads to get caught up.

Hailiejade77 · #25 07-12-2008, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeriouslySearching

Yes, it is way off. It reminds me of the Peterson case and LE hiding Tom...but the difference is that we know Tom is a state's witness. Are they going to let Ray Gagnon walk on this if he gives them the information that will put MJ up to face the DP?!

Who was Tom???