Casey's Photobucket - Page 29

Mendara · #**701** 03-03-2009, 03:13 PM

Bond awesome simply awesome.

SissyPo · #**702** 03-03-2009, 03:22 PM

When was all the photo's taken, before or aften Caylee's death?
If casey had so many pictures of everyone including herself then why doesn't she have any of this so called Nanny that supposely watched little caylee! BECAUSE THERE WAS NO NANNY! It was all made up to cover the murder she (Casey) committed.

doublejack · #**703** 03-03-2009, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SissyPo

When was all the photo's taken, before or aften Caylee's death?
If casey had so many pictures of everyone including herself then why doesn't she have any of this so called Nanny that supposely watched little caylee! BECAUSE THERE WAS NO NANNY! It was all made up to cover the murder she (Casey) committed.

The vast majority of KC's photos I have seen all date to before Caylee went missing. And yeah, there is no nanny in any of them!

TotallyObsessed · #**704** 03-03-2009, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smolea

that can be easily photoshopped..in fact, being a graphic artist i know that when retouching a "glamour" photo, the *first*thing you look at is the nose -get rid of any crookedness, then fill in the hairline to make it appear fuller. nobody wants to look at no crooked nosed baldheaded girls. The nose piercing SHOULD have been retouched, but wasn't. That picture has definately had some "work done" to whoever it is.

That completely cracked me up!

Laece · #**705** 03-03-2009, 03:49 PM

that porn pic may or may not be casey; no one can say for sure. hair length and colour, nose shape, and especially the fact that casey bites her nails (

) is irrelevant because these are all things that can and probably would be photoshopped given the type of material. for everything that seems to be a reason it can't be her, there is a reason that seems it can be as well, and reverse. we don't know. would it be a surprise? i doubt it. i have a hard time fathoming how a mother can kill her child, but that happens whether i choose to believe it or not, right? so this to me doesn't seem impossible at all.

i am sure LE has gotten a hold of this pic and has looked into it. hopefully if it is relevant, they know why and are doing whatever that can do. if not, hopefully they have moved on.

Hot Dogs · #**706** 03-03-2009, 04:14 PM

I must be missing something fundamental behind the theory that this porn pic is KC.

If the photo is unaltered, it can't be her because of the bones and cartilage related to the nose structure. If the nose (and hairline, nails, etc) was meaningfully altered, then we don't know what the actual features looked like because they are now different. The actual woman may have had a big fat mole digitally removed from her cheek - but we don't know that because now it's gone.

Are people thinking it is her because this image was found on her hard drive, or one of the image host sites she used?

digitaldisplay · #**707** 03-03-2009, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blooming Rose

I think it's her; whether or not it's real is another story...

Most people are saying it's real and I also heard she did a porn film...

I would think the OS would pull the thread if it's not legit...

she has blue contacts on. This is not KC.

Hot Dogs · #**708** 03-03-2009, 04:26 PM

Are these blue-gray contacts or her real eyes?

digitaldisplay · #**709** 03-03-2009, 04:35 PM

I was referring to the pic that was found on the topix forum. Sorry, should have been clear on that.

snookie · #**710** 03-03-2009, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hot Dogs

Are these blue-gray contacts or her real eyes?

Looks like her natural color imo.

Hot Dogs · #**711** 03-03-2009, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitaldisplay

I was referring to the pic that was found on the topix forum. Sorry, should have been clear on that.

I understand. But folks in this thread threw out a wildcard.... digital alteration. They might say it looks like the model is wearing blue contacts, but that is only a Photoshop (PS) thing.

If a person wants it to be KC, they can use the PS wildcard for any feature that doesn't resemble KC. Heads, I win - tails, you lose.

Pink Panther · #**712** 03-03-2009, 04:47 PM

I've been unable to keep up lately and I'm a bit confused at this point...Have additional photobucket images been released to the public yet? If so, can someone please (pretty please) post a link!

rch85 · #**713** 03-03-2009, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pink Panther

I've been unable to keep up lately and I'm a bit confused at this point...Have additional photobucket images been released to the public yet? If so, can someone please (pretty please) post a link!

No there was a hearing yesterday bc JB was trying to stop the release of 1000's of more pics of kc, she apparently has a few photobucket accounts that are private.

rch85 · #**714** 03-03-2009, 05:13 PM

OHHHH and apparently the judge ruled late last night the photos can be made public!!

http://www.wftv.com/news/18841582/detail.html

Linda7NJ · #**715** 03-03-2009, 05:18 PM

So when do we get to see them???????????????????

geeesh! I would have thought they'd be up online somewhere by now!

SL_Zero · #**716** 03-03-2009, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rch85

OHHHH and apparently the judge ruled late last night the photos can be made public!!

http://www.wftv.com/news/18841582/detail.html

oh yay!
i was so aggravated that i sat through that whole droning mess of a hearing and nothing conclusive came of it.

now, we salivate and wait. hehe.

rch85 · #**717** 03-03-2009, 05:38 PM

I don't know when we will get to see the pictures....hopefully very, very soon!!

SL_Zero · #**718** 03-03-2009, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rch85

I don't know when we will get to see the pictures....hopefully very, very soon!!

oh i'm sure it will be a while.
its not going to get released to the media directly.
or will it.......................?!

i would think that if prosecution wants it as evidence, they will have to supply it to defense, making it subject to publicity via a new doc dump.

or am i a total numbskull and has this part already happened and thats why jb went to court to supress it from a dump, because its already been given to defense from prosecution who intends to use it?

tiredofthis · #**719** 03-03-2009, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rch85

OHHHH and apparently the judge ruled late last night the photos can be made public!!

http://www.wftv.com/news/18841582/detail.html

Excuse me for sounding childish but....."We get to see the pictures. We get to see the pictures."

mydailyopinions · #**720** 03-03-2009, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiredofthis

Excuse me for sounding childish but....."We get to see the pictures. We get to see the pictures."

Will the media outlets really put these on their sites though? I mean IF there are pictures anything like the one I seen in this thread..

How could they?
I think we need to do a document dance or something..
This waiting is nerve racking..

ishouldbworking · #**721** 03-03-2009, 06:39 PM

the orlando sentinel released these...although i am MOST certain this isnt all of them...esp since there are only 100

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...5.photogallery

tiredofthis · #**722** 03-03-2009, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mydailyopinions

Will the media outlets really put these on their sites though? I mean IF there are pictures anything like the one I seen in this thread..

How could they?
I think we need to do a document dance or something..
This waiting is nerve racking..

I don't know. Maybe they will hold some of the really bad ones back.

I am willing to do a document dance.

Linda7NJ · #**723** 03-03-2009, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mydailyopinions

Will the media outlets really put these on their sites though? I mean IF there are pictures anything like the one I seen in this thread..

How could they?
I think we need to do a document dance or something..
This waiting is nerve racking..

IOt's probably taking so long because they have to block out or make fuzzy so much!

anyone remember that blue dot during the kennedy rape trial?

Rumpole · #**724** 03-03-2009, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mydailyopinions

Will the media outlets really put these on their sites though? I mean IF there are pictures anything like the one I seen in this thread..

How could they?
I think we need to do a document dance or something..
This waiting is nerve racking..

There are sites showing the absolute in pornography. (So I am told) I would hope somebody will post them?

SL_Zero · #**725** 03-03-2009, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linda7NJ

IOt's probably taking so long because they have to block out or make fuzzy so much!

anyone remember that blue dot during the kennedy rape trial?

im voting for old-school black bars over the naughty bits if the pictures ae in fact risque. they're just so definitive.

purely for aesthetic reasons, aka my viewing pleasure.
fuzzy is always creepy to me.