Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Crimes and Trials > Trials > Recently Sentenced and Beyond > Kathleen Savio

Notices

Kathleen Savio The trial of Drew Peterson in the death of his third wife Kathleen while his fourth wife Stacy remains missing.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2009, 09:47 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
trying to strike down the hearsay law

http://www.wbbm780.com/Drew-Peterson...MOTION/4973607

Drew Peterson's lawyers go back to court in Will County this morning for a status hearing on the murder charge against him in the death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

SEE THE MOTION

Meanwhile, WBBM's Regine Schlesinger reports they're trying to strike down the Illinois law that goes to the heart of the prosecution's case. For their case against Peterson, prosecutors are relying heavily on so-called testimony from beyond the grave.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old 08-10-2009, 09:49 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.prnewschannel.com/absolut...es/?a=1548&z=4

Drew Peterson's defense team has filed a motion to have the new Illinois hearsay law, nicknamed "Drew's Law," declared unconstitutional.


Peterson’s legal team asked the Will County Circuit Court to declare the new Illinois hearsay law unconstitutional.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 08-10-2009, 09:51 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://cbs2chicago.com/local/drew.pe...2.1121153.html

The motion is expected to hold up the start of Peterson's murder trial.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 08-10-2009, 09:55 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2...arsay-law.html

"The new hearsay law ... would allow gossip, innuendo, rumor and back fence scandal to come into court and masquerade as evidence," the motion states. The motion is posted on the Web site of Peterson's attorneys.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2009, 10:40 AM
Peculiar Petunia Peculiar Petunia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 196
Ex Post facto or about time?

Never mind--Paintr beat me to the link on the Tribune's site. :-)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2009, 07:46 PM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?sec...cal&id=6958203

While attorneys were in the judge's chambers today, Peterson stayed in the court room and talked with reporters about his three months in jail.</p.
I asked him about the food, Peterson said," the food is not bad, I eat everything in front of me."
Peterson says he does not exercise because he does want to exercise in the same clothes he must wear all day...fighting boredom is his biggest challenge. As for reading, Peterson told me, "I hate reading", but he does watch TV. Peterson said, "I've seen Stripes several times so if I start to talk like Bill Murray you'll know why."'
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2009, 10:31 PM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
If Mr Brodsky succeeds in getting this law declared unconstitutional, criminals from all over Illinois will hail him as a hero.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2009, 10:36 PM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/h...081009.article

To understand the law, consider this example: There is a court case, and the defendant knows a certain witness will testify. If the defendant kills the witness — or makes them disappear — to stop the testimony, the law allows statements made by the witness to be used in court.

Stacy's statements

In this case, Stacy Peterson, Drew Peterson's missing fourth wife, allegedly told a minister that her husband had killed his third wife, Kathleen Savio.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-11-2009, 12:54 AM
mysteriew's Avatar
mysteriew mysteriew is online now
A diamond in process
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintr View Post
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/h...081009.article

To understand the law, consider this example: There is a court case, and the defendant knows a certain witness will testify. If the defendant kills the witness — or makes them disappear — to stop the testimony, the law allows statements made by the witness to be used in court.

Stacy's statements

In this case, Stacy Peterson, Drew Peterson's missing fourth wife, allegedly told a minister that her husband had killed his third wife, Kathleen Savio.
Kathleen Savio also sent a letter to I think the DA that gave details of alleged mistreatment by DrewP both during the marriage and during the time when he began dating Stacey. I think this is also included in the hearsay law.


Without the hearsay law, criminals have a motive. To get the witness quiet. So in some ways the hearsay law, if kept on the books is a form of protection for the victim. If the perp wants to quiet them, but knows they have already put their issues in writing then the value of killing them is reduced.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mysteriew For This Useful Post:
  #10  
Old 08-11-2009, 08:45 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,1334049.story

The law was specifically drafted to meet constitutional muster, said a spokesman for the state's attorney's office, who added that similar laws have been enacted in more than a dozen states.

"Mr. Glasgow is eager to argue this motion and he believes thoroughly that he will prevail as to the constitutionality issues," said spokesman Charles Pelkie.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-11-2009, 08:49 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local...-52916302.html

Drew Doesn't Want to Hear From Dead Wife
"Drew's Law" was enacted last year

The motion was expected. After Peterson's arrest this year for the 2004 slaying of Savio, Will County State's Attorney James Glasgow said he planned to use the new law to let Savio tell jurors why Peterson wanted her dead.

Savio told several people before she died that she was afraid her husband would kill her.

...

Similar hearsay laws exist in 12 other states, including Wisconsin.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-11-2009, 03:03 PM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/08/...8451250005915/

Stacy Peterson allegedly told a minister that her husband killed Savio, prosecutors have said.

Under the new law, known as Drew's law, that statement and others allegedly made by Savio could be admitted as evidence in the murder case against Peterson, whose lawyers Monday asked Will County Judge Stephen White to find the law unconstitutional.

The U.S. Constitution guarantees Peterson the right to confront an accuser in court, something he cannot do in this case, lead defense lawyer Joel Brodsky said.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-11-2009, 03:06 PM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.thonline.com/article.cfm?id=252843

In a motion filed Monday, attorneys argue the Illinois hearsay law is unconstitutional and would allow Kathleen Savio to testify from beyond the grave. The law was enacted last year.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-12-2009, 04:55 PM
closeobserver closeobserver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 326
This is obviously something the defense has to do. It was expected that they would challenge it, so nobody should be overly concerned. We can only hope that the drafters of the legislation created a constitutionally acceptable law. It certainly makes sense.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to closeobserver For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 08-12-2009, 11:37 PM
thesleuther thesleuther is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 318
I can completely understand the validity of entering Kathleen's own words in her own handwriting to the court. This seems, to me, an absolutely fair and reasonable use of the law.

While I personally loathe Drew Peterson and am certain he killed both Kathleen and Stacy, I have to wonder about the introduction of the pastor's statements about what Stacy allegedly said about Kathleen's death. If Stacy had put it in writing, that would be one thing. But quoting what someone said about what Drew said seems really iffy to me. I think that this particular item would be challenged all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, and I'm not certain that the ruling would be favorable.

JMO
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-14-2009, 11:11 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://mystateline.com/content/fulltext/?cid=91392

Attorneys will also argue a motion to drop a new Illinois hearsay law, which would allow prosecutors to use alleged statements made by a dead victim.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-18-2009, 08:50 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.southtownstar.com/news/17...09drew.article

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan wants to get involved in Drew Peterson's murder case to help Will County prosecutors defend the constitutionality of a controversial new law known as "Drew's law."

.............

White has scheduled an Oct. 2 hearing on the constitutionality of Drew's Law. In addition to Glasgow, an assistant attorney general would argue on behalf of Drew's law if White allows the office into the case.

"This motion to intervene serves a very limited purpose," Madigan spokeswoman Robyn Ziegler said Monday. "The attorney general has the responsibility of defending the constitutionality of state laws
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-18-2009, 08:53 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/b...n-case.article

To understand the law, consider this example: There is a court case, and the defendant knows a certain witness will testify. If the defendant kills the witness — or makes them disappear — to stop the testimony, the law allows statements made by the witness to be used in court.

In this case, Stacy Peterson, Drew Peterson's missing fourth wife, allegedly told a minister that her husband had killed his third wife, Kathleen Savio. Stacy Peterson disappeared in October 2007. State police have called the case a potential homicide
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-15-2009, 06:26 PM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
Attorneys for former Bolingbrook police sergeant Drew Peterson say they have filed final papers and briefs in their motion to have the new Illinois hearsay law declared unconstitutional.

The law was expected to play a role in Peterson's upcoming trial for the murder of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.






http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/c...,2340024.story
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-15-2009, 06:28 PM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.prnewschannel.com/absolut...es/?a=1643&z=4

Drew Peterson's Motion To Silence "Cry From The Grave" Law Now Online
Documents filed now available for viewing online.

Drew Peterson's lawyers - Joel Brodsky, Andrew Aboodand Reem Odeh- sent their Reply Brief to the State's Attorney and the Attorney General today. Judge Stephen White is set to hear arguments on this motion on October 2, 2009.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:
  #21  
Old 10-02-2009, 08:01 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/h...100109.article

The constitutionality of law seen as crucial in the Drew Peterson case is expected to be argued Friday when Peterson returns to court.

Peterson, a former Bolingbrook police sergeant, is being held on murder charges in the 2004 death of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.



Layers for Peterson have asked Will County Judge Stephen White to declare unconstitutional a new state law called Drew's Law.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:
  #22  
Old 10-02-2009, 08:03 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.wbbm780.com/Could-Drew-Pe...-Free-/5344656

Could Drew Peterson Go Free?


The judge is expected to rule on a defense motion for a change of venue, and the judge is expected to hear arguments on the constitutionality of the so-called "Drew's Law," hearsay testimony that would allow statements by the missing fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, into evidence.

Peterson's lawyer Joel Brodsky says odds that the judge will rule in Peterson's favor - and not allow the hearsay testimony - are better than even.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:
  #23  
Old 10-03-2009, 12:03 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...5s2SwD9B36I3O0

Judge rules law in Peterson case constitutional
(AP) – 7 hours ago

JOLIET, Ill. — An Illinois judge has ruled that prosecutors can introduce statements made by former police officer's Drew Peterson's now-deceased ex-wife at his trial.

Will County Judge Stephen White ruled against Peterson's attorneys Friday in their attempt to get the state's so-called "hearsay" law declared unconstitutional. He also denied a request by the former Bolingbrook officer's attorneys to have the trial moved.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:
  #24  
Old 10-03-2009, 12:05 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local...-63285527.html

Drew Must Stand Trial in Will County:






AP Drew Peterson will have to stand trial in Will County after a judge denied his change of venue plea.


Judge Steven White rejected the defense’s bid to have the trial moved. The defense believed that Peterson would have trouble finding an impartial jury
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-03-2009, 12:08 AM
Paintr's Avatar
Paintr Paintr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North
Posts: 5,491
http://cbs2chicago.com/wireapnewsil/...2.1223925.html

A judge on Friday refused to move Drew Peterson's murder trial and said a law that prosecutors want to use to allow his ex-wife he's accused of killing to "testify from the grave" is constitutional.

...

Possible evidence in the case might include letters written by Savio, who was seeking orders of protection, in which she said Peterson would kill her to shut her up and her sister's testimony at a coroner's jury that Savio told her family it would be no accident if she died.

Brodsky said he has not decided whether to appeal the judge's decision on the hearsay law to the Illinois Supreme Court.
__________________
JMO



RIP Travis Alexander
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New hearsay law: The discussion, the controversy mysteriew Kathleen Savio 7 05-20-2009 05:45 PM
latest on Hearsay Bill - mid November closeobserver Kathleen Savio 60 11-22-2008 01:16 AM
Washington State closes loophole in 3-Strike Law sherryggg Up to the Minute 5 03-14-2008 12:46 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!