Coleman attorney involved within "hours of occurrence"

analytical · #1 08-27-2009, 06:07 AM

http://www.bnd.com/news/local/story/898340.html

Kimster · #2 08-31-2009, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by analytical

http://www.bnd.com/news/local/story/898340.html

I wonder who's idea THAT was??? CC or daddy?

Lindadanette · #3 08-31-2009, 08:44 PM

Hmmm - And "privately paid" too. I wonder who has that kind of money?

MCDRAW · #4 09-01-2009, 09:23 AM

I wonder why they felt the need to explain when they were obtained, within hours of the occurence and not the charges. In my opinion that only makes Coleman look even more guilty. I thought their job was to make him appear not guilty. JMO

Kimster · #5 09-01-2009, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCDRAW

I wonder why they felt the need to explain when they were obtained, within hours of the occurence and not the charges. In my opinion that only makes Coleman look even more guilty. I thought their job was to make him appear not guilty. JMO

I know what you mean! I was thinking the exact same thing!

LadyBugSTL · #6 09-01-2009, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kimster

I know what you mean! I was thinking the exact same thing!

Ditto! Major {{{expensive}}}} damage control being done *very early in the case........doesn't go very far to prove someone's "innocence"........IMO