Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > Caylee Anthony 2 years old

Notices

Caylee Anthony 2 years old Not reported missing for a month after she was last seen.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 10-17-2009, 01:50 PM
ExpectingUnicorns's Avatar
ExpectingUnicorns ExpectingUnicorns is online now
. . . only the pure of heart can see.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valhall View Post
OMG! You're right. Caylee shouldn't have lost any teeth yet. O_O
My tummy is giving me some bad signals. Please let it be wrong.
__________________
The heart of the pure can see, but my eyes have never seen the unicorn . . .
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ExpectingUnicorns For This Useful Post:
  #52  
Old 10-17-2009, 01:50 PM
McSev McSev is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtElf View Post
You guys are on the right track here.
Yep. And I might point out that the defense, after the travesty of a motion they filed and the outcome yesterday, has a huges issues in the evidentary arena:

Baez was not laughing when he was ordered to turn over evidence his team claims to have proving someone else dumped Caylee's body in the woods last year. The deadline is February 1.

Screwed is the word that comes to mind, initially anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-17-2009, 01:53 PM
robotdog robotdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,220
the nanny hit her in the mouth

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


<insert> puke icon
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to robotdog For This Useful Post:
  #54  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:00 PM
ThoughtElf ThoughtElf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,943
Logic check, pls

I'm off my rocker. To me, both the items listed on exhibit #22 and the photos/funding are related. Excellent sleuthing, but, I am of the opinion that whatever is sealed is NOT displayed on the list on exhibit #22. They would have already issued a retraction since the doc dump yesterday if it was. They can't show sealed items, IMO.

I *think*, but I am not sure that it either relates to the photo that was sealed, or again, that the one document shows Casey gave items (like photos/videos) to JB for him to sell - items which did not later show up on Exhibit #22 list. i.e. JB kept them to sell and finance the defense.

I think it isn't what is on that list - it is a document proving JB has more than what he turned over to the FBI. What ISN'T on that list is crucial?

Last edited by ThoughtElf; 10-17-2009 at 02:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:08 PM
McSev McSev is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtElf View Post
I'm off my rocker. To me, both the items listed on exhibit #22 and the photos/funding are related. Excellent sleuthing, but, I am of the opinion that whatever is sealed is NOT displayed on exhibit #22. They would have already issued a retraction since the doc dump yesterday if it was. They can't show sealed items, IMO.

I *think*, but I am not sure that it either relates to the photo that was sealed, or again, that the one document shows Casey gave items (like photos/videos) to JB for him to sell - items which did not later show up on Exhibit #22. i.e. JB kept them to sell and finance the defense.

I think it isn't what is on that list - it is a document proving JB has more than what he turned over to the FBI. What ISN'T on that list is crucial?
I agree with you. One thing that I think people don't know is that while the defense has to share the evidence they have with the State it has to be revealed before the trial and that's a long way away. If the State wants it right away, they can compell the defense by filing in court for specific pieces of evidence to mandate a specific time for the defense to deliver to the State. The defense, BTW, has already done this several times with evidence they wanted from the State right away, such as the tip information the State had.

As far as what others are saying about the tooth: IIFC, bone fragments from the body were spread out all over the place. They didn't have a complete skeleton when they were done to begin with, so I think it's possible the tooth was lost over time in that area as many of the other bone fragments were.
Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to McSev For This Useful Post:
  #56  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:20 PM
ExpectingUnicorns's Avatar
ExpectingUnicorns ExpectingUnicorns is online now
. . . only the pure of heart can see.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoughtElf View Post
I'm off my rocker. To me, both the items listed on exhibit #22 and the photos/funding are related. Excellent sleuthing, but, I am of the opinion that whatever is sealed is NOT displayed on the list on exhibit #22. They would have already issued a retraction since the doc dump yesterday if it was. They can't show sealed items, IMO.

I *think*, but I am not sure that it either relates to the photo that was sealed, or again, that the one document shows Casey gave items (like photos/videos) to JB for him to sell - items which did not later show up on Exhibit #22 list. i.e. JB kept them to sell and finance the defense.

I think it isn't what is on that list - it is a document proving JB has more than what he turned over to the FBI. What ISN'T on that list is crucial?
Yes, I hope so. And the more I look at exhibit #22 the more it looks like the list on the left is what was actually taken to JB. The list on the right may just be a suggestion of the type of things that Casey should gather from within the house. The writer, whose handwriting is not familiar to us, may not have realized that Caylee was too young to have lost any of her teeth.
__________________
The heart of the pure can see, but my eyes have never seen the unicorn . . .

Last edited by ExpectingUnicorns; 10-17-2009 at 02:22 PM. Reason: correct name!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ExpectingUnicorns For This Useful Post:
  #57  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:22 PM
countzero countzero is offline
self timeout
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,824
Just popping in folks, but my first thought of this was the diary.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:24 PM
texaslb218's Avatar
texaslb218 texaslb218 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DFW area
Posts: 1,137
I totally forgot about the diary!! Guess that puts me NOT in the "good sleuth" category.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to texaslb218 For This Useful Post:
  #59  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:27 PM
ExpectingUnicorns's Avatar
ExpectingUnicorns ExpectingUnicorns is online now
. . . only the pure of heart can see.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by countzero View Post
Just popping in folks, but my first thought of this was the diary.
Seems like I remember BC telling Cindy (during an interview) that he was in possession of the diary. But my brain cells are degenerating faster than they're being replaced anymore so I may very well be wrong. Anyone else remember this?
__________________
The heart of the pure can see, but my eyes have never seen the unicorn . . .
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:28 PM
whiteangora's Avatar
whiteangora whiteangora is offline
I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 5,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSev View Post
Yep. And I might point out that the defense, after the travesty of a motion they filed and the outcome yesterday, has a huges issues in the evidentary arena:

Baez was not laughing when he was ordered to turn over evidence his team claims to have proving someone else dumped Caylee's body in the woods last year. The deadline is February 1.

Screwed is the word that comes to mind, initially anyway.
I put this up in the current news thread earlier, could this be what Kathi B is asking about, re: Bombshell?
Kathi Belich Asks JB About Bombshell in February
http://www.wftv.com/video/21311710/index.html
Kathi asks JB repeatedly about his Bombshell for February, gets no answer. Andrea L gives Kathi snotty response about who files the motions.
__________________
Neighborhood Watch is...
NOT the Vigilante Police
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigati...PowerPoint.pdf




Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to whiteangora For This Useful Post:
  #61  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:32 PM
countzero countzero is offline
self timeout
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExpectingUnicorns View Post
Seems like I remember BC telling Cindy (during an interview) that he was in possession of the diary. But my brain cells are degenerating faster than they're being replaced anymore so I may very well be wrong. Anyone else remember this?
That is correct. The LAST we heard, BC had the diary. Doesn't prevent him from sharing with JB and the SAO is aware of it. If BC had not involved himself in that part of the objection I wouldn't have thought about it. But he did.

What ever it is, it's damming for KC or at least JB thinks so.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:36 PM
Muzikman's Avatar
Muzikman Muzikman is offline
ROCKIN!
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExpectingUnicorns View Post
Seems like I remember BC telling Cindy (during an interview) that he was in possession of the diary. But my brain cells are degenerating faster than they're being replaced anymore so I may very well be wrong. Anyone else remember this?
You are correct, EC.

I was a little surprised that LE didn't want the whole thing, just a pic of those 2 pages.

Speculating: Or maybe there are pics of other pages and they are sealed for some reason?
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:38 PM
McSev McSev is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteangora View Post
I put this up in the current news thread earlier, could this be what Kathi B is asking about, re: Bombshell?
Kathi Belich Asks JB About Bombshell in February
http://www.wftv.com/video/21311710/index.html
Kathi asks JB repeatedly about his Bombshell for February, gets no answer. Andrea L gives Kathi snotty response about who files the motions.
Yep I saw that on the other thread. Hence why "screwed" looks like the word of the day in describing the defense. A "theory" doesn't translate to "evidence and proof", something that I think Baez and even his crew doesn't always remember. Their strategy looks to me to be for the short term, not a longer term one for trial.

To me it's apparent they're trying to cast as much doubt, both in court and out of it, prior to trial and this latest motion to toss all the charges appeared to me to be ill-formed. The State was right in their response to strike - I don't know who wrote the defense's motion but they didn't have a chance in hell and if Baez didn't forget where his lawyerin' books were, he had to know that. He also should have been advised by his team of crack attorneys that he was opening himself to a can of whoop *** in having to prove what he was filing about, because there is not a motion filed that doesn't have an equal and opposite action on the other side.
Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to McSev For This Useful Post:
  #64  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:38 PM
Trapshooter's Avatar
Trapshooter Trapshooter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valhall View Post
Yeah, I believe it's the day she blew out her flip-top...stepped on a pop top, cut her heel, head to cruise on back...wait, that's a song.
"head to cruise on back home....but there's booze in the blender and soon it will render that frozen concoction that helps me hang on!"

LOL My favorite song of all time Valhall!

Sorry to go OT.
__________________
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere!" MLK, Jr.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Trapshooter For This Useful Post:
  #65  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:42 PM
Trapshooter's Avatar
Trapshooter Trapshooter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macushla View Post
One more thing before I have to go back to 'real life'. IF the exhibit objected to was a photo (isn't one of the things on the list that Valhall posted "Mom and Baby") that the public has not seen yet, could it be because it was 'sold exclusively' to someone for either an article, book, TV show, etc. etc. If that photo was introduced into this depo, once the depo was released the photo would no longer be exclusive? I know that is a long and convoluted sentence so have patience with me. If an article, book or TV show comes out with that previously unreleased photo in it - that would pretty much seal the deal that someone had done a $$$$ deal for photos - and from CA's reaction, it was not her!
I agree Macushla! I think that photo will come out and the "proceeds" will go straight to JB!
__________________
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere!" MLK, Jr.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Trapshooter For This Useful Post:
  #66  
Old 10-17-2009, 02:58 PM
Trapshooter's Avatar
Trapshooter Trapshooter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExpectingUnicorns View Post
Yes, I hope so. And the more I look at exhibit #22 the more it looks like the list on the left is what was actually taken to JB. The list on the right may just be a suggestion of the type of things that Casey should gather from within the house. The writer, whose handwriting is not familiar to us, may not have realized that Caylee was too young to have lost any of her teeth.
Could the writer be JB and he was not bright enough to realize that Caylee was too young to have lost any teeth? Legally, if JB did give KC a list of things to bring from the house, couldn't he be "interfering" in the investigation?
__________________
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere!" MLK, Jr.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Trapshooter For This Useful Post:
  #67  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:02 PM
Muzikman's Avatar
Muzikman Muzikman is offline
ROCKIN!
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,068
OK, on the OCSO property form for what Baez gave to FBI/OCSO, there is a white Fedex box listed. It looks to me that it is separate than the brown bag with all of the items? Did it have something not listed inside it? Or was the bag in the box?

Makes me curious as to the wording.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13357630/Baez_OCSOpackage
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Muzikman For This Useful Post:
  #68  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:04 PM
static's Avatar
static static is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSev View Post
I agree with you. One thing that I think people don't know is that while the defense has to share the evidence they have with the State it has to be revealed before the trial and that's a long way away. If the State wants it right away, they can compell the defense by filing in court for specific pieces of evidence to mandate a specific time for the defense to deliver to the State. The defense, BTW, has already done this several times with evidence they wanted from the State right away, such as the tip information the State had.

As far as what others are saying about the tooth: IIFC, bone fragments from the body were spread out all over the place. They didn't have a complete skeleton when they were done to begin with, so I think it's possible the tooth was lost over time in that area as many of the other bone fragments were.
That could very well be...Just thinking out loud here that with the tape still on the skull though, shouldn't that have protected the teeth?
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to static For This Useful Post:
  #69  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:06 PM
Horace Finklestein Horace Finklestein is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSev View Post
Yep. And I might point out that the defense, after the travesty of a motion they filed and the outcome yesterday, has a huges issues in the evidentary arena:

Baez was not laughing when he was ordered to turn over evidence his team claims to have proving someone else dumped Caylee's body in the woods last year. The deadline is February 1.

Screwed is the word that comes to mind, initially anyway.
I still don't understand why they have over 4 months to turn this supposed 'evidence' over. Their client is in jail...if they have anything that would free her, why not turn it over? Why does nothing make sense here?? I think if I remember correctly, that Jose looked like he had nothing other than their 'reasonable conclusions' from examining the state's evidence. WHat is this all about?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Horace Finklestein For This Useful Post:
  #70  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:07 PM
Tiki's Avatar
Tiki Tiki is offline
"Juan more time"
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,497
Warning: Gruesome

Is it possible that one of Caylee's teeth fell out in the trunk while she was decomposing there and KC or the As found it?
I think it would really take longer for that to happen, but . . . anyone know?
Off to Google decomp and teeth - well, maybe later :-(

.
__________________
---------


Best Friends Animal Society

A better world through kindness to animals

[i]Please help BestFriends help us.

https://www.bestfriends.org/donate/index.cfm?
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tiki For This Useful Post:
  #71  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:11 PM
Macushla's Avatar
Macushla Macushla is offline
Our Royal Himalayan Gopher Hounds
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orlando, FL area
Posts: 2,433
As far as I know, the only 'sealed' testimony so far was the in camera discussion about how the defense was being funded. Judge Strickland sealed the video tape of KC at the jail the day Caylee was found, but that doesn't seem to be in play here. Ergo (I love using that word) the exhibit that freaked JB out to the point of being nasty to CA has to be related in some way to the defense funding. So, for right now I am sticking to my theory. However, if that one does not pan out, I would go with the theory posted that JB did not turn over everything when he was ordered to. Oh wouldn't that be loverly if it could be proven?
__________________
Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.
Euripides
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:13 PM
Tiki's Avatar
Tiki Tiki is offline
"Juan more time"
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,497
never mind - answered my own question by remembering teeth still intact on mummies . . .
__________________
---------


Best Friends Animal Society

A better world through kindness to animals

[i]Please help BestFriends help us.

https://www.bestfriends.org/donate/index.cfm?
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tiki For This Useful Post:
  #73  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:14 PM
McSev McSev is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by static View Post
That could very well be...Just thinking out loud here that with the tape still on the skull though, shouldn't that have protected the teeth?
Maybe. But I think I read that the tape, while layered, was loose. The skin it was attached to was gone.

Good question though
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to McSev For This Useful Post:
  #74  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:23 PM
McSev McSev is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horace Finklestein View Post
I still don't understand why they have over 4 months to turn this supposed 'evidence' over. Their client is in jail...if they have anything that would free her, why not turn it over? Why does nothing make sense here?? I think if I remember correctly, that Jose looked like he had nothing other than their 'reasonable conclusions' from examining the state's evidence. WHat is this all about?
Exactly. They don't have appear to have any evidence to prove what they're saying, do they? Many of the talk show/cable news pundits comment that it's grandstanding, and indeed it may be.

What I tend to think it is is what I stated before: a strategy to try to put as much doubt as possible out into the public eye so they can combat the overwhelming number of lies that their client, the accused, is on record as stating when they go to trial. It's going to be extremely difficult to get past that their client didn't report her daughter missing for 31 days, that she lied about her wherabouts to her parents during that time, that she lied to detectives about where she worked to the point of taking them to the facility and then having to recant to them. Those statements are fact and won't be able to be disputed by the defense.
Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to McSev For This Useful Post:
  #75  
Old 10-17-2009, 03:43 PM
ExpectingUnicorns's Avatar
ExpectingUnicorns ExpectingUnicorns is online now
. . . only the pure of heart can see.
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muzikman View Post
OK, on the OCSO property form for what Baez gave to FBI/OCSO, there is a white Fedex box listed. It looks to me that it is separate than the brown bag with all of the items? Did it have something not listed inside it? Or was the bag in the box?

Makes me curious as to the wording.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13357630/Baez_OCSOpackage
It looked like to me that the bag was inside the Fedex box. The only thing that Casey wrote on the left list on exhibit #22 that was not received by OCSO is the first thing on her list: "Caylee Hair Samples - Bed." Could that be significant?
__________________
The heart of the pure can see, but my eyes have never seen the unicorn . . .
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ExpectingUnicorns For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
03-25-09 sidebar, ashton & jb fight, autopsy report, baby teeth, ca depo 08-09, carseat, caylee's tooth, dna items, exhibit 22, exhibit 23, funding, globe picture, heated exchange, list, pictures, pictures sold, rm's computer, sealed, soddi, teeth & decomp, toothbrush, zip it

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
George & Cindy's Response to "NO DEATH PENALTY" Decision imnotheonlyone Caylee Anthony 2 years old 464 12-10-2008 02:14 AM
All Jose Baez #2 (Jail Hugging & Attorney Fees) JBean Caylee Anthony 2 years old 504 11-18-2008 05:51 PM
K&B Ask for custody order to be sealed RaleighNC Nancy Cooper 100 11-08-2008 06:57 PM
Baby Boy Clothes & Items for Sale Misfit76 WS-BAY! 1 11-01-2008 04:44 PM
Baez & Casey's relationship? manatee Caylee Anthony 2 years old 126 08-21-2008 06:58 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!