 |
|

02-27-2010, 08:31 PM
|
 |
Happy 2011!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On the Third Coast
Posts: 8,744
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salem
Okay - here's another question. When snipping info from the media (and providing the link of course) are we required to change the name of the innocents to initials and/or asteriks? What if the person is being directly quoted in the media? That means they brought the attention on themselves, right? So we can leave their name as is?
For example, the media quotes Jane Doe, a neighbor of the crime scene and she says blah, blah, blah. We would not have to reduce her name to initials would we?
TIA,
Salem
|
No. No need to reduce the name to initials. However, there is also no need to sleuth the neighbor and post his/her personal information at WS. Just thought I'd mention that because, unfortunately, it has been tried at WS.
hth,
Hoppy
__________________
"Don't forget the kangaroo!"
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to hoppyfrog For This Useful Post:
|
|

03-01-2010, 01:45 AM
|
 |
WS Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 23,252
|
|
|
Thank you Hoppy!
Salem
|

05-15-2011, 09:33 PM
|
 |
A diamond in process
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,415
|
|
|
I understand the rule about the sex offender registry. And I also understand about no proposing, encouraging or otherwise harrassing sex offenders.
But how about Family Watchdog? It isn't a government site and it contains the same info. Not for harrassment, but only as it relates to a case.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mysteriew For This Useful Post:
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| © Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 |
New To Site? |
Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|