NC-Shaniya Davis, 5, Allegedly sold by mother 11/10/09 #12

[elepher50]

Originally Posted by SuziQ

I wonder what the new info is?

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/...=1117200915852

Released: 11/17/2009Who do I contact? Theresa Chance
Public Information Officer
(910) 433-1896
Fayetteville Police DepartmentMedia Briefing Rescheduled Due to new information received in the investigation of Shaniya Davis, the Fayetteville Police Department has re-scheduled this afternoon’s media briefing to tomorrow morning, Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The briefing will be conducted in front of the police department.
At this time the Medical Examiner’s office has confirmed the identity of the body found to be that of 5-year old Shaniya Davis. Official cause of death is still undetermined at this hour.
There is no additional information to be released at this time.

-End-

Hi SuziQ:

From where I am sitting on this case and based on my opinon only, I would be expecting some upgraded charges against the two that are currently in custody and possibly some filing of obstruction of justice against at least one other individual.

Elepher - and I have been wrong many times before

[JustJax]

Originally Posted by passionflower

mmmmmmm, got me thinkin..........help needed?

any link on arrest? why arrested? bail?

Still looking for a link about the arrest, just this link for the inmate search for S McNeill that the poster gplablogger posted. He was arrested today for a paroll violation. This is usually how they can bring a suspect in on an active case without giving proable cause in the active murder case...look for something the supect may have done to violate is probation, bring him in, and then give him the questionaire.

type his name in here
http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx

[SuziQ]

Originally Posted by QuietStorm

I think you can post them as long as you source them. I'm not 100% positive but I post lyrics a lot but always credit them with writer and singer, sometimes the website I ripped them from.

I know you can't take someone's lyrics and make things for sale from them. That's a big no-no.

Copyright laws apply to all printed material.

[songline]

Originally Posted by alwaysonmymind

This has some photos I haven't seen.

YouTube- A Special Tribute To Angel Shaniya Nicole Davis 2/14/04-11/16/09

Thank you for that, that was beautiful.

[trigger]

Originally Posted by ella971

My question is why go to a hotel on camera???

Because people are stupid. There cameras rolling everywhere. Esp in stores. Theres hundreds of arrests in the malls of people going into the try on room put the stolen items in there bag and walk out of the store only to get caught.

[SuziQ]

Originally Posted by elepher50

Hi SuziQ:

From where I am sitting on this case and based on my opinon only, I would be expecting some upgraded charges against the two that are currently in custody and possibly some filing of obstruction of justice against at least one other individual.

Elepher - and I have been wrong many times before

BBM. My fingers are crossed on that. OJ is a personal pet peeve. A complete disregard for the victim.

[kiki the parrot]

Originally Posted by gitana1

I thought that the hotel manager said MAM checked into the hotel himself, with the child. Anyone remember this? So, that would mean he had his own room and no one was waiting in it. Unless he took the baby to another room.

I have never read or heard this... everything I've read or heard has said "carrying her into," or "arrived at" or something conspicuously absent of "checking in." I would be interested tho if you can point me to where this is reported anywhere. It's one of the reasons I believe he may have been taking her to someone else.

[essies]

Is there any more information to the disturbance at 3 AM that morning? Where did this info come from? TIA

[elepher50]

Originally Posted by JustJax

Still looking for a link about the arrest, just this link for the inmate search for S McNeill that the poster gplablogger posted. He was arrested today for a paroll violation. This is usually how they can bring a suspect in on an active case without giving proable cause in the active murder case...look for something the supect may have done to violate is probation, bring him in, and then give him the questionaire.

type his name in here
http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx

Possession of MJ I think:

[JustJax]

Originally Posted by elepher50

Here they are in all their glory from this link: http://www.ccsonc.org/active_inmates/Inmates.aspx

Thank You! I had not seen that first creeper. My skin is crawling.

[trigger]

Originally Posted by impatientredhead

Did you happen to see the other McNeil booked the same day as MAM.
I tried to put them side by side but it is not working.
He was a parole violation too.

Mcneill is a common name, so.

[imamaze]

Just a heads up... Going to close this thread please continue

Here

Here

[bessie]

Originally Posted by kiki the parrot

Yes and w/out question LE has known this info... yet are choosing to hold it very close. Think about it tho why would LE more likely do this--because McNeill had a room of his own and there was no indication that anyone else was involved? Or because there's someone else on whom they've been focusing, whom they believe participated in Shaniya's rape or suspect contributed to her death? To me it seems they would be quieter if they suspected or were working on the latter, I mean I can't imagine why they'd be tightlipped and not confirm his having gotten a room himself kwim?

I know what you mean, kiki, and posted as much a few days ago. Either the perp to whom MAM delivered Shaniyah registered the room in his name (which I find hard to believe); or, a motel employee secured the room, Which begs the question: has this motel been used for similar purposes in the past?

[elepher50]

Originally Posted by JustJax

Thank You! I had not seen that first creeper. My skin is crawling.

Ya, good old D was arrested the same day as MAM - made my skin crawl but cannot find any connection - not saying there isn't - I just couldn't find any.

[songline]

Originally Posted by SuziQ

I wonder what the new info is?

http://police.ci.fayetteville.nc.us/...=1117200915852

Released: 11/17/2009Who do I contact? Theresa Chance
Public Information Officer
(910) 433-1896
Fayetteville Police DepartmentMedia Briefing Rescheduled Due to new information received in the investigation of Shaniya Davis, the Fayetteville Police Department has re-scheduled this afternoon’s media briefing to tomorrow morning, Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The briefing will be conducted in front of the police department.
At this time the Medical Examiner’s office has confirmed the identity of the body found to be that of 5-year old Shaniya Davis. Official cause of death is still undetermined at this hour.
There is no additional information to be released at this time.

-End-

They may also be looking at other people and not ready to say murder yet...Once they do say it they have to go with it.
I am not sure they are looking at anyone else but I am still unclear on how they eliminated Cole so fast. strange to me.

[Carolina Girl]

Originally Posted by kiki the parrot

I have never read or heard this... everything I've read or heard has said "carrying her into," or "arrived at" or something conspicuously absent of "checking in." I would be interested tho if you can point me to where this is reported anywhere. It's one of the reasons I believe he may have been taking her to someone else.

I have not read or seen that before. Link?

[impatientredhead]

Originally Posted by CharlestonGal

I've thought about that as well. The problem is, why would mom call 911 if this was an agreed upon client appointment? If MAM did the appointment on his own, why is AD and not MAM charged with trafficking?

If a john was waiting and mom knew and approved, she would not have called 911. If she didn't know and MAM did it on his own, she wouldn't have been charged with trafficking. The john theory falls apart right there.

I think something happened earlier that MAM and AD had to cover up. He did the dirty work and she called 911 with the cover story implicating someone else. Coe.

My theory is that the 911 call was planned in advance.
Mom knew she was not coming back.
She told the Aunt as much in hindsight.
They had to explain a child that was missing.

I think the 911 call was made after the delivery was suppose to have been made. They couldn't report her missing if the john flaked out and wanted to meet the next day.

I think at 3am MAM picked her up and that is what the neighbor heard.
He shows up at the hotel at 6:11
Mom calls the police after he is there and I presume the money is exchanged, done deal, she is not coming back.

Momster starts the missing kid report.

Not saying it was a good plan, just that she was doing her part in a plan.

[elepher50]

Originally Posted by SuziQ

BBM. My fingers are crossed on that. OJ is a personal pet peeve. A complete disregard for the victim.

My pet peeve too SuziQ.

[CharlestonGal]

Originally Posted by kiki the parrot

I have never read or heard this... everything I've read or heard has said "carrying her into," or "arrived at" or something conspicuously absent of "checking in." I would be interested tho if you can point me to where this is reported anywhere. It's one of the reasons I believe he may have been taking her to someone else.

In the press conference last Thursday, the spokeswoman specifically used the words they "checked in" several times. She also said they had "checked out" before the police got there.

[LogicalMinds]

"Alwaysonmymind"....thank you for that beautiful tribute to Shaynia

I was also struck by the fact that this sweetheart's birthday was Valentines Day..
Feb 14 2004

So very sad...oh why oh why did this have to end like this? Thanks for that beautiful video