Colorado launches criminal probe into forensic analyst Yvonne 'Missy' Woods who 'performed shoddy DNA testing & altered data

Gardenista

On Time Out
Joined
Jun 21, 2016
Messages
19,034
Reaction score
157,390
I swear she looks familiar


Colorado has launched a criminal probe into its star forensic analyst Yvonne 'Missy' Woods after 'anomalies' were found in her DNA testing work.

Woods, 60, is under investigation for allegedly performing shoddy DNA testing and altering data. Her work and testimonies have sent hundreds of people to jail over her three-decade career - and now thousands of cases may have to be reopened.

She has worked in her trade for 29 years, and was considered the state's 'gold standard' by colleagues for helping to put infamous murderers behind bars.

The shocking discovery was made in November, when the Colorado Bureau of Investigation performed an internal review and found that some of her crucial data was altered or missing. Woods, 60, abruptly resigned.
 
I swear she looks familiar


Colorado has launched a criminal probe into its star forensic analyst Yvonne 'Missy' Woods after 'anomalies' were found in her DNA testing work.

Woods, 60, is under investigation for allegedly performing shoddy DNA testing and altering data. Her work and testimonies have sent hundreds of people to jail over her three-decade career - and now thousands of cases may have to be reopened.

She has worked in her trade for 29 years, and was considered the state's 'gold standard' by colleagues for helping to put infamous murderers behind bars.

The shocking discovery was made in November, when the Colorado Bureau of Investigation performed an internal review and found that some of her crucial data was altered or missing. Woods, 60, abruptly resigned.

Cases mentioned in the article

Diego Olmos Alcalde - murder of Susannah Chase

Alex Ewing 'Hammer Killer' - serial killer

Robert Harlan - convicted of the kidnap, rape and murder of Rhonda Maloney

Garrett Coughlin - convicted of killing 3

Aaron Thompson - convicted child abuser

James Whitler - convicted of murder in Fort Collin

James Hunter - convicted in 2002 for sexual assault and burglary

:eek:
 
Last edited:
WS threads

Diego Olmos Alcalde

Alex Ewing GUILTY - CO - Bruce, 27, Debra, 26, & Melissa Bennett, 7, murdered, Aurora, 16 Jan 1984 *inmate arrest 2019*

Robert Harlan

Garrett Coughlin
 
Oh, my, what a mess for Colorado. SMH. Hoping they will be able to see what the "errors" were and to get dependable evidence for those who may have possibly been falsely convicted. Lotsa time, money, and now probably a backlog of recent cases that have been awaiting trial.
- - - - - -
A bit from a recent article:
"About 3,000 DNA samples need to be retested by a third-party laboratory, CBI officials estimated in a January budget request. That will cost roughly $3 million. Additionally, the agency asked for $4.4 million to pay out to district attorney’s offices across Colorado to address claims by people who say they were wrongly convicted of crimes because of Woods’ work.
The former CBI scientist was involved in some of Colorado’s most high-profile criminal cases in recent decades, including the 2004 Kobe Bryant rape case, the 1994 murder of Rhonda Maloney, the prosecution of Aaron Thompson in the death of his daughter, and the murder of University of Colorado student Susannah Chase."
Much more here:
"About 3,000 DNA samples need to be retested by a third-party laboratory, CBI officials estimated in a January budget request. That will cost roughly $3 million. Additionally, the agency asked for $4.4 million to pay out to district attorney’s offices across Colorado to address claims by people who say they were wrongly convicted of crimes because of Woods’ work.
The former CBI scientist was involved in some of Colorado’s most high-profile criminal cases in recent decades, including the 2004 Kobe Bryant rape case, the 1994 murder of Rhonda Maloney, the prosecution of Aaron Thompson in the death of his daughter, and the murder of University of Colorado student Susannah Chase."

Source:
 
And another CO DNA mess with this one:
[Chiara Wuensch was fired Wednesday, the sheriff's office said in a statement Friday morning, after a month-long investigation by the sheriff's office. That investigation was initiated after findings from a separate investigation by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation into one of its forensic scientists who's facing similar accusations.]
 
And another CO DNA mess with this one:
[Chiara Wuensch was fired Wednesday, the sheriff's office said in a statement Friday morning, after a month-long investigation by the sheriff's office. That investigation was initiated after findings from a separate investigation by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation into one of its forensic scientists who's facing similar accusations.]

Just put her last name in WS search and it looks like she was on the Jonelle Matthews case

 
[...
According to CBI, 652 cases between 2008 and 2023 were identified as being affected by Woods’ data manipulation.

CBI said the data was manipulated in the following ways:
  • Deleted and altered data that concealed Woods’ tampering with controls
  • Deleted data that concealed Woods’ failure to troubleshoot issues within the testing process
  • Failed to provide thorough documentation in the case record related to certain tests performed
Per the investigation, CBI claims the manipulation was intentional on Woods’ part.

“The review did not find that Woods falsified DNA matches or otherwise fabricated DNA profiles. She instead deviated from standard testing protocols and cut corners, calling into question the reliability of the testing she conducted....]
 
Just put her last name in WS search and it looks like she was on the Jonelle Matthews case

""DNA is typically considered to be bulletproof evidence in the identification of the defendant. If there is some problem with that evidence, some credibility issues, that is going to be a really important concern for prosecutors." This is something I have been warning about for some time. There are problems with DNA evidence and this is just one of them. Courts are just starting to reconsider dna evidence and how it is introduced. One of the biggest problems with DNA is what it is offered prove actually. Jurors just hear things like "1 in 10 billion chance this is not the person" and they just assume the case is closed.
 
Last edited:
I swear she looks familiar


Colorado has launched a criminal probe into its star forensic analyst Yvonne 'Missy' Woods after 'anomalies' were found in her DNA testing work.

Woods, 60, is under investigation for allegedly performing shoddy DNA testing and altering data. Her work and testimonies have sent hundreds of people to jail over her three-decade career - and now thousands of cases may have to be reopened.

She has worked in her trade for 29 years, and was considered the state's 'gold standard' by colleagues for helping to put infamous murderers behind bars.

The shocking discovery was made in November, when the Colorado Bureau of Investigation performed an internal review and found that some of her crucial data was altered or missing. Woods, 60, abruptly resigned.
She looks like Nikki Haley, I think.
 
So she was altering controls and not keeping records of her managing the lab properly? That's not the same as manipulating results in cases. She should have done her job and needed to be let go but I wonder if any verdicts were actually affected. Will be interesting to watch.
 
So she was altering controls and not keeping records of her managing the lab properly? That's not the same as manipulating results in cases. She should have done her job and needed to be let go but I wonder if any verdicts were actually affected. Will be interesting to watch.
Unfortunately manipulating controls can affect the results, and therefore potential matches in DNA comparisons.
In addition to that, if the test does not meet industry standard/procedural guidelines, the results may be considered invalid (no one can tell if they're reliable or not if the proper procedure has not been followed).
So the results MAY or may not be reliable, which in a court of law is obviously not good enough.

"Incorporating controls in STR DNA analysis is an essential and required part of the testing process. Introducing controls at each step of the DNA process allows the analyst to identify and troubleshoot possible issues and ensure that the methods used produce accurate and reliable results."
STR Data Analysis and Interpretation for Forensic Analysts

"To ensure that the DNA profile generated from the amplified DNA is representative of the DNA from the evidence sample and not from contamination, and to verify that the testing process is accurate, DNA protocols require forensic DNA scientists to analyze a series of control samples. "
The FBI DNA Laboratory: A Review of Protocol and Practice Vulnerabilities
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
83
Guests online
4,170
Total visitors
4,253

Forum statistics

Threads
592,488
Messages
17,969,717
Members
228,788
Latest member
Soccergirl500
Back
Top