Well, I cant speak for the IDI group, but I certainly recognize how and why the Ramseys came to be suspects (beyond the fact that they were in the house), and I think that some of the responsibility for this lies at their feet. Regardless, it is simply not true that IDI do not understand the evidence, or that they have not considered the possibility of RDI, or that we deny all reason for suspicion, etc.
What eats me alive re this case? The certainty, the conviction with which a Thomas, a Kolar (an RDI) speaks.
...
AK
Well Thomas and Kolar speak with conviction because they actually investigated the case. If anyone can be certain the family was involved, it is them.