I doubt it BJ - the hydrologist report said that the water never got up to the point where the body was fully submerged.
The high tide level just got to the body, and partially submerged the lower parts that were in the mud. The rest of the body stayed high and dry.
The hydrologist was of the opinion that the body was not moved at all by the water - it was placed where it was found.
The weekend of very heavy rain that occurred and caused flooding in some areas actually coincided with LOW tide - so Kholo Creek's LOW tide level was much higher than normal - but only on the low tide. And it didn't reach the NORMAL high tide level, according to the hydrologist. The flooding was already subsiding by the time the tide was rising.
So we have flooding versus the tide, and at no point in that episode did the water come up and submerge the body or move it - according to the hydrologist.