Behind again in the thread. Sorry if this has already bn discussed at length.
“People can say what they want about me, but when it comes down to the court, they’ll find that I’m not ‘a fake,’ ” he said. “At the end of the day, I assisted Dr. Baden. I didn’t do the autopsy.”
Parcells didn’t know how the Browns’ attorneys found him, surmising it could have been from a recent email advertising campaign to area attorneys. After Baden was hired, the medical examiner still requested Parcells’ help, he said.
http://m.cjonline.com/news/2014-08-21/topeka-native-plays-key-role-autopsy-ferguson-shooting. ....
BBM SBM
In link above, Parcells said: ---Browns' atty found him. ---After Baden was hired, the ME still requested his (Parcells') help.
So who did Brown's attys hire first? Parcells or Baden?
If Baden was hired first, did he tell attys -
---I want someone to assist me, then attys said,
Good, we'll find some guy sending email ads to MO or KS bar members. OR
---I
want Parcells to assist me?
IDT Crump is KS or MO bar member,just FL. Ditto, his law partner Parks, right?
How would Parcells' email ads to area attys h/bn sent to them, licensed in FL?
Imo, if Baden specified Parcells to assist, then Parcells' bolded stmt in article about attys finding him, does
not make sense.
Why would one of the top (three, five, ten?) most experienced pathologists w long time ME exp. in US either -
---not specify a particular bd-cert-path, or at least an MD, to assist? Or
---agree to accept some random non-bd-cert-path or non-MD to assist, simply based on attys 'finding' him?
Just wondering, JMO.