VA - Hannah Elizabeth Graham, 18, Charlottesville, 13 Sept 2014 - #12

Status
Not open for further replies.
https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-48

Abduction (i) of any person with the intent to extort money or pecuniary benefit, (ii) of any person with intent to defile such person, (iii) of any child under sixteen years of age for the purpose of concubinage or prostitution, (iv) of any person for the purpose of prostitution, or (v) of any minor for the purpose of manufacturing child *advertiser censored* shall be punishable as a Class 2 felony. If the sentence imposed for a violation of (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) includes a term of confinement less than life imprisonment, the judge shall impose, in addition to any active sentence, a suspended sentence of no less than 40 years. This suspended sentence shall be suspended for the remainder of the defendant's life subject to revocation by the court.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OMG he's being railroaded!!!!!!!1one1111!!!!eleven!!!.

Heh.

You know, the mocking is not appreciated. I don't understand why some feel the need to continuously do this just because some people prefer to wait until they hear evidence.
 
Exactly my thoughts..

Mine as well. Sounds to me like these charges are not for Hannah, but are related to another victim of attempted rape that has come forward. They now have something more concrete to press charges for. (jmo, of course)
 
Bummer, I really hoped they had him in custody. JMO
 
What a scum bag they need to find him!!!! He not being rail roaded!!!! Look at tje facts please!!!
 
The essence of this offense is kidnapping someone and demonstrating an intent or actually having some type of sex with him or her, i.e. Abduction with Intent to Defile. “Abduction” and “kidnapping” are synonymous in Virginia. Abduction is defined by Virginia Code Section 18.2-47 as follows:

When one by force, intimidation, or deception, seizes

Takes, transports, detains, or secretes another with the

Intent to deprive that person of liberty or withhold or

Conceal him from proper custody.

This particular statute appends a specific mental state to the above definition, that of the abductor doing the abduction with the intent to defile (commit rape, carnal knowledge, sodomy, object sexual penetration) or to place a child under 16 into prostitution.

The act of the abduction isn’t necessarily actually transporting the victim, and it would seem that the abductor could simply “deprive that person [the victim] of liberty” in the exact same spot where they met. The abductor can even transport the purported victim to an isolated location without any apparent protest from the victim. The prosecution must then prove the abductor’s mental state, i.e. the abductor took the victim to the other place for the purpose of being able to commit his sex crime without fear of being caught.

A specific example of “abduction with the intent to defile”: The abductor observes somebody at a convenience store in the process of shoplifting. The abductor approaches the victim and pretends to be store security, then transports the victim to an isolated location and commits a rape.

Abuction with Intent to Defile is a Class 2 Felony, punishable 20 years to life in prison and/or a fines of up to $100,000. This punishment would be in addition to the jury’s recommended punishment for the underlying sex offense, i.e. rape, carnal knowledge, sodomy, object sexual penetration). This offense can pertain to victims who are either an adult or a juvenile

The most horrible thing about this statute is that it can tack 20 years of minimum-mandatory prison onto what may have been a relatively-low jury sentence for the sex offense. For example, I once had a jury for a rape in one jurisdiction which found my client guilty and gave him 5 years of prison time, the absolute minimum sentence. Then, the second jury in the jurisdiction from which the victim was abducted found him guilty of the abduction and had to give him the 20 years minimum mandatory.

http://www.rgmorganlaw.com/sexcrimes.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Dear Older White Man,
I'm sorry for thinking you were responsible.
 
Does this mean they found her? How else would they know it was just attempt?

i think its attempt till them find the body basically (or until they get a DNA match on him to some other cases).
 
If not in relation to other cases, the "intent to defile" as defined above could be in relation to attempt to prostitute. Maybe there were photos? Online attempt to prostitute?
 
Could defile mean he had pornographic photos of her on his phone?
 
What sort of evidence would bring about an attempt to defile charge? Seems mostly linked to prostitution so do they have some sort of evidence of that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
190
Guests online
3,075
Total visitors
3,265

Forum statistics

Threads
592,205
Messages
17,965,068
Members
228,717
Latest member
RedWriter
Back
Top