Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That appears to a. be someone who's been in the courtroom observing.
b. someone who posts in the identical vitriolic/passive aggressive yet formal style as @justice4jodiann .
c. Someone who wanted their own words deleted IMMEDIATELY from that forum where they were posted (see the all caps post at the bottom)
d. Someone who believed JODI ARIAS was to be "speaking to the jury" yesterday afternoon.
That appears to a. be someone who's been in the courtroom observing.
b. someone who posts in the identical vitriolic/passive aggressive yet formal style as @justice4jodiann .
c. Someone who wanted their own words deleted IMMEDIATELY from that forum where they were posted (see the all caps post at the bottom)
d. Someone who believed JODI ARIAS was to be "speaking to the jury" yesterday afternoon.
Hey everyone, Good morning WOW you all stay up late LOL. So I've been thinking about Gus Searcy, is he the one who ja took some photos of herself for, I remember something about a bathroom, a motorhome, I can't remember if this photo had to do with a bruise, or maybe just another one of *advertiser censored* photo. He's the one who had someone in his car but wouldn't say who that was? Also, is this witness for the defense or the prosecution?
KCL, you constantly amaze me with your insight. The only person who seems to have insider knowledge of DT strategy is Kiefer. Could he be the one behind those tweets? As in duality?
Kathy, a while ago I posted that while the two justice for Jodi sites were claiming to be unaffiliated at this point, I believed they still were. A justice for Travis site also said this. Jodi and her supporters have made a big thing about making sure everyone knew that she had two factions of supporters and a phone call was leaked. There is a financial reason for this and for why she wants people to believe this.
How would this person know if Jodi was speaking/testifying today? I think I know...
I'm curious because there was something in this post he/she wanted hidden immediately. And I don't think it was the trashing Tanisha part or the observations of the jury or the part where they are mentioning not getting back in. I think it's the "Jodi will be talking to the jurors" part. How would they know this and do we believe it?
View attachment 62483
The only way someone is in that courtroom daily is if they are on a media pass, a family/friend of Jodi or on the courtroom staff.
This tweeter wants acknowledgment of their "observations" as clear (being they are in there) but avoids every single question just asking IF they are seated in there (thus giving their tweets credibility) yet jumps all over me when I link them to this post they wanted immediately hidden to some "vent room".
I know nothing about the cannabalistic politics going on in the Jodi camp nor do I care. Attacking victims' families, yes I care about that and it's coming like a stream from that twitter account. I want to know who they are and their proximity to the family. People like that scare me. So I've been watching this tweeter closely.
There are a couple of candidates IMO for who this might be. I also wonder if by speak they mean testifying or just allocuting?
I come back to JSS saying that CMJA "needed" this witness. I have a difficult time believing she's referring to a nutjob from NZ, as JM would no doubt have been able to inform her NZ guy is just that.
I'm not pointing at anyone specifically but I do know, IF they are in there daily it is one of three things: a media pass, a Jodi supporter (and we see who those are daily right? and I do NOT think it's Jodi's mom) or a courtroom staff person.