bourne
"The truth shall set you free." ~JUSTICE FOR REBEC
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 2,406
- Reaction score
- 13
None of that is actually evidence that Adam, Dina, and Nina did anything at all to Rebecca. What physical evidence places them there? Anything at all?
Evidence as plain as day that all three were present:
1) Adam *admits* to police (and on videotape with polygrapher) he was physically present all night at the Spreckels mansion the night/morning Rebecca was murdered; he even *admits* he found her hanging and cut her down with a knife he took from the Spreckels mansion kitchen;
2) Nina *admits* to police and the media (CBS8 via audio interview) that she was physically present at the Spreckels mansion during timeframe Rebecca was murdered;
3) Dina is physically observed by a whole family of impartial eyewitnesses (unrelated to Zahaus or Shacknai/Romanos) to be at the Spreckels mansion during timeframe Rebecca was murdered; eyewitness even states that he saw Dina "acting bizarrely" at front door while carrying a large black bag and that he saw Dina walking to back of Spreckels mansion too.
How's that for physical evidence?
All three defendants (Dina, Nina and Adam) had *motive, opportunity, and means* to murder Rebecca. Jury is not stupid. They will put two-and-two together and see that some combination of these defendants tortured, humiliated, and killed Rebecca. In this case, both circumstantial and physical evidence proves (to me, beyond a shadow of a doubt, beyond reasonable doubt) but in this civil case, Zahau lawyers only need to prove by a *preponderance of evidence* (that means just slightly more than 50% more likely than not) that Rebecca was heinously and sadistically murdered by a combo of the three defendants. That, my friends, mean Dina and Nina and Adam must all be *****ting in their pants (pardon french) and running scared right about now. Happy holidays!