Nali87
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,309
- Reaction score
- 819
You guys were right. What is she waiting for? She has heard all this before.
Why is she allowing the jury to hear it if she hasn't come to a decision?
You guys were right. What is she waiting for? She has heard all this before.
Source: Twitter
"Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 1m1 minute ago
Judge just said there will be no ruling on the motion to dismiss until Flores finishes his testimony. #jodiarias."
Bk said in her notes JSS would rule on all today.
Lambchop had better have some warning notes about not trashing the judge lined, because I think a bunch of them are getting ready to fly!!
I really think she's allowing the DT to make their case to the jury about misconduct so she can rule against them but say she provided a remedy for this retrial.
I really think she's allowing the DT to make their case to the jury about misconduct so she can rule against them but say she provided a remedy for this retrial.
I'm beginning to think JA refused to let the DT call mitigating witnesses to support her PTSD/BPD/mental history despite Nurmi promising the jury he would do so. The DT has been in full attack-TA/attack-JM from the get-go, and has offered next to nothing to explain why JA butchered her "beloved" Travis that "she loved so much".
JW is just being an *advertiser censored*.
as per Beth
JW shows EF exhibit 233--one of JA's journals. The journals were found by Yreka PD, Mesa PD and Siskyou Sheriff's. The journals were photocopied and copies given to the state and the defense. JW: So, are you okay if I tear a piece of paper from this journal? EF: No, that would be destroying it. JW: What if I take the paper out and tape it back in? EF: I'm not okay with it but at least it can be tracked. If you take the paper, you would be destroying it. I would not let you tear the paper out.