Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 21

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
AZlawyer said:
Well, the State Bar of AZ says it's not "advice" unless it's about YOUR legal issues, so let me just be very clear that I'm not providing legal advice to people in a bunch of states and countries where I'm not licensed. :)

But yes, LWP is technically an option. What I was trying to say is that IMO JSS will never pick that option because it involves a built-in special action appeal which she would want to avoid.



Yes, but if he's found something new, direct would be re-opened on the new information.
Click to expand...

Still, with all the explanations and gratis legal opining, sometimes you must feel like you're pro bono publico here.

There should be some CV and/or other value which accrues for the teaching time you put in on websleuths.com.
 
MarVa said:
But ultimately it doesn't matter because almost every male looks at *advertiser censored*.
Click to expand...

Have you ever seen the British TV show called "Coupling"? It's HILARIOUS (the US version was a bust, though). In any case, the topic of *advertiser censored* among the guys pops up in small doses on a regular basis. It's a given. There's also an entire episode that revolves around it. One of the characters explains to one of the women that he and his friend are "*advertiser censored* buddies". She's taken aback by the implications, but he's quick to explain that what that means is that if one of them dies, the other one is to take whatever means necessary to collect (and keep) his buddy's *advertiser censored* collection before the family finds it. That may or may not have been in the episode about a *advertiser censored* tape that a girlfriend DOES find (and views). The guy then (in front of dinner guests) has to explain that it's not what she thinks it is as he gamely attempts to describe what the plot of the movie is. :biggrin:
 
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.

Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
 
Does anyone else find it odd that despite what Nurmi said about having 14 witnesses that were refusing to testify under their own name he was able to call Detective Flores first thing today? I guess Flores forgot to give his fake name when asked on the stand. He could have used a better disguise too!
 
daisydomino said:
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.

Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
Click to expand...

Oh, Daisy, while I understand, I would really miss you. Hopefully by Wednesday you'll be sucked back into the vortex.
 
Viewing adult *advertiser censored* is not a mitigating factor nor is it illegal. JA was trying to say Travis viewed child *advertiser censored* on a piece of paper. Such paper does not exist and further, there is no evidence that any such activity took place on TA's computer.

Non issue.
 
daisydomino said:
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.

Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
Click to expand...

I am beginning to feel the same way. It is so exhausting. I have been following since 2013 and I am close to throwing in the towel.
 
Katharine said:
This was an excellent article!! Yes, it is very, very long, however, if you take the time to read it, so much is made so clear. I am not computer savvy by any stretch of the imagination, but I can get the most important details out of this article. Please take the time to read it. Thank you so much for providing the link.
Click to expand...

The list of unsubstantiated outright lies by the DT is amazing. No surprise, but amazing in their audacity. Plus, I guess it's confirmed? June 1st, 2008, was the date of the POSSIBLE purposeful visit to YouPorn (UPorn?).

IMO, the late May "breaking point" was due to a revenge *advertiser censored* threat by JA. I truly believe TA's reaction went beyond the sneaking, the cyber-stalking, and the BMW payments. He was over-the-top angry and hurt. It would be "in character" for JA to tell TA the mysterious "Steve" (the person who was allegedly helping coordinate JA's online presence) found some of their "scandalous" photos and posted them to YouPorn.

I mean, what's a *advertiser censored* to do?
 
Shadowboy said:
The list of unsubstantiated outright lies by the DT is amazing. No surprise, but amazing in their audacity. Plus, I guess it's confirmed? June 1st, 2008, was the date of the POSSIBLE purposeful visit to YouPorn (UPorn?).

IMO, the late May "breaking point" was due to a revenge *advertiser censored* threat by JA. I truly believe TA's reaction went beyond the sneaking, the cyber-stalking, and the BMW payments. He was over-the-top angry and hurt. It would be "in character" for JA to tell TA the mysterious "Steve" (the person who was allegedly helping coordinate JA's online presence) found some of their "scandalous" photos and posted them to YouPorn.

I mean, what's a *advertiser censored* to do?
Click to expand...

I think Dr. MF clarified that to "shank", did she not? :laughing:
 
ZoeyW said:
I still love what a very emotional Dave Hall said one day ,"She has had SIX YEARS. Jodi Arias cannot get ONE person to come take the stand for her. If Mr. Martinez were to ask for a character witness for Travis Alexander......the line would form around the courthouse, down the block and wrap around the city of Mesa!"

I have great faith in Juan Martinez. He is going to blow the roof off the place. Travis deserves the zeal and passion he fights with. Yes. He does. The jury wont have to look around for the truth once Juan gets up. The truth will be like a bright sunlight after the storm. Either that or Juan will blow the roof off the place . It just depends how you like your headline to read. You see how mine does. View attachment 67356 View attachment 67357
Click to expand...

Respectfully snipped by me (space), nice summation, thanks for sharing what many of us are thinking and WELCOME!

:wagon: :welcome4: :welcome6:

:fireworks: :fireworks: :fireworks:
 
daisydomino said:
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.
Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
Click to expand...

dear daisyd, and all the others who are so witty and funny and make me laugh, I cannot thank you enough for peppering the comments with these light, funny statements...what a truly amazing group of people here on websleuths.....
it has been a long haul no doubt-very tense and frustrating and maddening, but so often when I read comments like the BBM above, it breaks the tension and frustration, so again, thank you.
 
daisydomino said:
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.

Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
Click to expand...

What? Walk away from our wit, charm, and acerbic humor? Will miss you!
 
daisydomino said:
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.

Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
Click to expand...

Oh no you don't. You don't get to quit on us. If we all quit watching, they win. That's what they want. Get a good sleep, then get your butt back here tomorrow at noon, it's transcript day. We need our daisy!
 
Truth Detector said:
Still, with all the explanations and gratis legal opining, sometimes you must feel like you're pro bono publico here.

There should be some CV and/or other value which accrues for the teaching time you put in on websleuths.com.
Click to expand...

I appreciate so much all of our legal beagles and the knowledge they share. I feel like I'm practically a lawyer now.
 
daisydomino said:
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.

Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
Click to expand...

Motion Denied!! :gavel:
 
daisydomino said:
Just when I think this trial has reached the outer limits of weird, it takes a step beyond. Detective Flores on the stand again? It's like déja vu of déja vu. Today was my last day of trying to follow minute by minute with the Tweets. I just can't with this anymore. I have more fulfilling things to do, like clean my toaster.

Justice for Travis. I'll see you here occasionally.
Click to expand...

Thanks for all your tweets that I subscribed too. Bless you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 81 more.
Total: 3,866 (members: 82, guests: 3,784)

Online statistics

Members online
82
Guests online
3,785
Total visitors
3,867
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
595,542
Messages
18,026,140
Members
229,680
Latest member
hachiko304
Back
Top