Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 1/29 thru 2/2 - Break

[Wagara]

Judges are not authorized to "vet" evidence for truthfulness before it is allowed. Juries get to decide what to believe, even if it is obviously a lie. JSS is not allowing the defense to present Witness #1's testimony "as fact"--she is allowing them to present it as testimony, which is what it is.

If ever called I will be a much better juror due to your posts. I get you and your interpertation of the law and I appreciate you so much.

 

[Wing Ding]

A lot will come down to whether their mitigation case is successful, or not. If the killer walks away from the DP for the 2nd time, ChaCha will get more work, imo.

So Cougarlicious' future is also in the hands of 12 jurors. She may very well end up being more of Jodi's collateral damage.

 

[NashBridges2]

He's being tried for a single murder in MA

http://www.rollingstone.com/feature/...-in-the-huddle

By now, even Hernandez seems to have sensed that he was wildly off course. According to a source close to Hernandez, he flew to the NFL Combine in Indianapolis this past February and confided to Belichick that his life was in danger. Hernandez was trying to break away from the gangsters he’d befriended. He worried “they were actually trying to kill him,” says the source. Hernandez began arming himself, stashing a rifle in his gym bag and installing a 14-camera security system at his mansion. “He was very paranoid, but was that because of his addictions or because he was trying to leave the gang?”


He's been charged with two killings in Miami as well iirc

Okay, I really literally know nothing, other than his name and that he's a suspect in 3 murders. I Didn't even know he was a football player until I saw a tweet about jury selection the other day. I'd be a good juror in his case as I really am clueless and know nothing. Its not a case that's been heavily talked about here in Canada. Either way, after this JA trial, I'm taking a break, this ones been exhausting lol

 

[Dr. Know?]

Court doc filed Oct. 22, 2013 by JA to remove Nurmi. It's like a peek into the mind of a mad woman.

http://wildabouttrial.com/court_docs/jodi-arias-nurmi-motion.pdf

 

[AZlawyer]

Sorry for responding to comments in the previous thread and responding without quotes. Somewhere, in the previous thread, there was a discussion as to JA’s culpability re: her defense. There was speculation (as has been ongoing) that JA’s long, freaky “creature” hands have guided her defense/mitigation arguments. ITA with those in the previous thread who believe JA is in charge of her defense.

This current jury knows that JA is guilty of premeditated murder with cruelty. Did I say that right? THAT verdict is not in question. Premeditated. Cruelty. Here is what this jury knows: JA stabbed, chased, cut through a windpipe; dragged a lifeless body across a blood soaked tile floor; shot “it” in the head; arranged/kicked “it” into a shower; attempted a cleanup; and (likely) rinsed herself off, as “its” lifeless body bled out in the shower.

That said …

IIRC, earlier in this sentencing phase, the DT filed a motion saying the Defense for JA would be “scrutinized” in years to come if JA was not allowed to testify in “secret.”

Allow my non-legal take: The DT has known, from the beginning, JA’s insistence for “self-defense” was bogus. They have known, from the beginning of this sentencing phase, that “TA was a bad boyfriend/TA viewed chorn/I was abused” are all poor/non-existent mitigating factors. Yet, give the DT credit: JA testified without cross. Seriously slimy; but the DT got her “I was abused” chit in the record and in front of the jury, without JM’s “wha?” The Geff’s testimony was disrupted. And the Alexanders’ VIS are a thing of the past. The DT also presented “innuendoes,” in front of the jury, that the Victim sought out *advertiser censored*; the Prosecutor tried to hide the Victim’s proclivities for *advertiser censored*.

DT also got the Court to admit testimony out of order, further confusing the “truth landscape” (as opposed to the “slime highway.”

I don’t agree with the DT’s strategy, but ….? I think they did what they had to do, given “puppeteering” by their client.

AZL: Is there any precedent for a Defense Team filing an appeal based on, “Our Client insisted *advertiser censored* defense, in spite of our advice?” Does an Appeals Court consider such an argument?

No, that wouldn't be an appeal argument. An appeal argument has to go like this: "The trial court erred by _____________, which harmed the defendant because ____________________."

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

Marking my spot

so as if I understand is Travis had moved out in August, and Jake, the Bishop son friend, moved in September, and he and his cousin Tommy looked at few picture of scantly clad women and got a pop up virus? Then MMC/witness#1 find them when surfing the net while visiting his new bride to be, tells the bishop, who takes the computer in to have it cleaned and there was no child *advertiser censored* found? correct so far? There was no Travis and MMC/witness #1 at the same time - there was no Travis crying on his shoulder about child *advertiser censored*, no telling him about being molested when he was twelve, he wasn't even around when DeAnna was, everything he said was a lie.

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

Is she *advertiser censored*-eyed? Cross-eyed? Astigmatism?

Yes you can see it about age two? Look online it also grows more noticeable when shes tired

 

[NashBridges2]

Marking my spot

so as if I understand is Travis had moved out in August, and Jake, the Bishop son friend, moved in September, and he and his cousin Tommy looked at few picture of scantly clad women and got a pop up virus? Then MMC/witness#1 find them when surfing the net while visiting his new bride to be, tells the bishop, who takes the computer in to have it cleaned and there was no child *advertiser censored* found? correct so far? There was no Travis and MMC/witness #1 at the same time - there was no Travis crying on his shoulder about child *advertiser censored*, no telling him about being molested when he was twelve, he wasn't even around when DeAnna was, everything he said was a lie.

That pretty much sums it up. Huge epic fail. Almost as good as the Walmart lady testifying and going register by register that NO GAS CAN was returned. I still LOL when I remember Nurmi quietly whispering "we have no questions for this witness"

 

[Val1]

Yes you can see it about age two? Look online it also grows more noticeable when shes tired

I don't recall who had asked about treating a psychopath if caught early, but this article/study kind of addresses it. The following one should be using JA's picture....:

http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/crime/criminal-psychopaths-dont-understand-punishment-study/ar-AA8EjBc

"Criminal psychopaths don't understand punishment: study"

http://www.wikihow.com/Identify-a-Psychopath

"How to Identify a Psychopath"

http://www.health24.com/Medical/Depression/Psychotherapy/How-to-recognise-a-psychopath-20120721

"How to recognise a psychopath"

 

[Frigga]

Something I noticed when I read the few posts there from last night: There seem to be a lot of posters there who are victims of DV. Perhaps they are sorting their truth through this lie that is CMJA. It is kinda like a mutual DV survivorship blog.

Here at WS, I think we come here because of our own passion for justice, whatever the driving force or interest was. No one in my normal every day life is a homicide survivor nor understands it. I don't speak about it and most have no clue. I can come here and write about my perspective and know that some of you are members of this horrible club, others have the compassion to understand loss and grief and desire to see whatever wrongs can be righted.

I feel sorry for them as they have attached to a heinous felon, but hopefully have found others to share their experiences with. IMO, JMV

You have such a kind and lovely heart, what a compassionate way to look at it. Outside of the male scam artist running the sites I am sure you are probably right about the women that find their way there. I appreciate your perspective on this and your last sentence has made me think very differently about them.

 

[mydirtysecret]

Having worked for a defense attorney, I have to say that being a 'loose cannon' is not always considered a bad thing. Not if you succeed at your job.

JMO

Who decides what mit specialist to hire? And No i do not think MDLR will Be ever hired by a defense attorney. If and i mean IF CMJA gets life it's because of the defense attorneys despite the facts that their client and mitigating specialist have nearly sabatoged them at every avenue.
ETA- KN and JW have been handed the short straw for their defendant. They started from an impossible point with her. Add into that MDLR and I'm surprised SURPRISED KN hasn't had a heart attack and JW still has hair.

 

[Retrofit]

I have a question for those who know more about the Mormon faith that I. When you "confess" to the Bishop, is the confession a privileged communication? Maybe the Bishop has an attorney in case the DT asks for specifics as to what TA and DR actually told the Bishop in order to advise as to whether or not the information is protected.

 

[Val1]

Marking my spot

so as if I understand is Travis had moved out in August, and Jake, the Bishop son friend, moved in September, and he and his cousin Tommy looked at few picture of scantly clad women and got a pop up virus? Then MMC/witness#1 find them when surfing the net while visiting his new bride to be, tells the bishop, who takes the computer in to have it cleaned and there was no child *advertiser censored* found? correct so far? There was no Travis and MMC/witness #1 at the same time - there was no Travis crying on his shoulder about child *advertiser censored*, no telling him about being molested when he was twelve, he wasn't even around when DeAnna was, everything he said was a lie.

Super long post.. but these are the tweets for the Bishop's testimony, start at the bottom:

"MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 18s19 seconds ago
#JodiArias court is starting to feel like CLUE game: ah ha! it was "Col Mustard in the library with *advertiser censored* on the computer" #abc15

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 19s20 seconds ago
Nurmi asks to approach. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 31s32 seconds ago
Juan is done and Nurmi wants to approach. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 46s47 seconds ago
Bishop said Witness 1 never came to him to disclose discovered chorn on computer. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 46s46 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
So it wouldn't jeopardize Witness #1's wedding like he stated in his affidavit #jodiarias #3tvarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 56s56 seconds ago
Bishop also says he would not have punished Witness 1 if he came to him and reported child *advertiser censored* on the computer. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 38s38 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
The bishop would never punish someone for telling him about *advertiser censored* on the computer #jodiarias #3tvarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 53s53 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Bishop says his computer never crashed and he never disciplined any of the boys. #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 1m1 minute ago
Bishop says there would be no punishment for Witness 1 coming to him saying he accidentally stumbled upon inappropriate content. #jodiarias

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq 2m2 minutes ago
#JodiArias Bishop’s says his son told him that another boy named Jake. Bishop had PC in shop for it.

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 16s17 seconds ago
#JuanMartinez shows witness#1 affidavit: HE was not honest w/Bishop P about who caused the "Scantily Clad Ladies" pop ups #JodiArias #abc15

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 29s30 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Juan has the affidavits from Witness #1 on big screen #jodiarias #3tvarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 33s33 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Bishop- My son told me it was Jake and Tommy Thompson told me it was Jake (they are cousins) #jodiarias #3tvarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 27s28 seconds ago
Bishop doesn't think the computer ever crashed like Witness 1 said. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 42s43 seconds ago
Bishop's nephew, Tommy, says Jake admitted to him he caused pop-up content on Bishop's computer. #jodiarias

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 44s45 seconds ago
Bishop Parker: Per Jake Tommy Thompson (cousin) confessed 2Jake HE caused "Scantily Clad Ladies" pop-ups #JodiArias #TravisAlexander #abc15

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 45s46 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Who was responsible for the pop ups on the computer Bishop- It was Jake Thompsons #jodiarias #3tvarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 1m1 minute ago Phoenix, AZ
Did Witness #1 ever tell you he saw child *advertiser censored* on the computer? Bishop- NO #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 30s30 seconds ago
Bishop's son believes pop-up ads & inappropriate content was bc of roommate Jake. #jodiarias

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq 34s34 seconds ago
#WHOOMP there it is. Bishops says #jodiArias non witness #1 was the *advertiser censored* pop up king (my words) and he told Bishop about the pop ups

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 39s39 seconds ago
Bishop Parker: My son had reason to believe it was Jake looking at *advertiser censored* that #JodiArias atty.'s claim was #TravisAlexander #abc15

Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 30s31 seconds ago
Bishop's son told him he had reason to believe it was Jake that caused the inappropriate pop-ups. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 44s45 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Bishop took computer to shop and had virus removed No folders of child *advertiser censored* was brought to his attention #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 21s22 seconds ago
Bishop took computer in 2 computer expert per Witness 1 & no one reported 2 Bishop that there was chorn folder. (Did it exist?!) #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 23s24 seconds ago
Bishop thinks that the virus pop-ups were because of Jake not Travis. #jodiarias

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 49s50 seconds ago
Bishop Parker tells #JodiArias jurors he took computer 2a shop 2 remove "Scantily Clad Ladies" pop ups virus- no child *advertiser censored* #abc15

Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 52s53 seconds ago
Parker adds that witness #1 had access to Bishops computer and he reported pop-ups on his computer. #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 1m1 minute ago
The bishop took the computer to the shop to remove the viruses. No folders of child *advertiser censored*. Witness 1 never told him there was any *advertiser censored*.

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 42s42 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
It was scantily clad women on the pop ups. Witness #1 wasn't disciplined for telling the Bishop this #jodiarias #3tvarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 53s53 seconds ago
Witness 1 told bishop that there were pop-ups of scantily-clad women on computer. #jodiarias

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 1m1 minute ago
Bishop Parker: there were scantily clad lady "pop ups" were brought 2his attention by witness#1 #JodiArias #TravisAlexander #abc15

Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 47s47 seconds ago
Bishop Parker says Witness #1 knew computers. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 50s50 seconds ago
Jurors taking cray cray notes right meow. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 1m1 minute ago Phoenix, AZ
During the time Witness #1 was courting his lady pop ups started to show up on the computer. Witness #1 told the Bishop about it #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 1m1 minute ago
Bishop says Witness 1 brought up salacious pop-up ads on Bishop's computer. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 2m2 minutes ago
Bishop said Witness 1 came over almost every day. #jodiarias

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq 20s20 seconds ago
Aha so it was #JodiArias non-witness witness #1 who had access to the Bishops PC says Bishop. Travis never seen use it by him or his family

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 42s42 seconds ago
Bishop Parker tells jurors witness#1 knew his way around computers #JodiArias #TravisAlexander #abc15

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 34s35 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Witness #1 was very familiar with computers according to Bishop #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 34s35 seconds ago
Witness 1's girlfriend lived with Bishop until marriage. Less than 5 months. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 1m1 minute ago Phoenix, AZ
Witness #1 would come visit this woman at the Bishop's house. #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 1m1 minute ago
Bishop can't recall exact employment but remembers Witness 1 worked with computers. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 2m2 minutes ago Phoenix, AZ
Witness #1 had Parker's permission to use the computer TA wasn't living there at that time #jodiarias #3tvarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 2m2 minutes ago
Alexander was not living in the house when witness 1 was there to visit the girl he thought he might marry. Witness 1 used the computer.

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 2m2 minutes ago
Witness 1 would come visit girlfriend at Bishop's house & had permission to use Bishop's computer. #jodiarias

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq 2m2 minutes ago
JodiArias secret non witness #1's online GF came and stayed with the Bishop. No males stayed at home.

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 2m2 minutes ago
Bishop Parker witness#1's online GF also lived w/him after parents asked 4a safe place 4her 2stay 12/2000 #JodiArias #TravisAlexander #abc15

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 3m3 minutes ago Phoenix, AZ
She came to stay late Nov/Dec 2000 #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 3m3 minutes ago
Witness 1's online girlfriend lived w/Bishop. Bishop says he would not have allowed that if another male was living there. #jodiarias

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq 32s33 seconds ago
#JodiArias secret non witness witness #1, Bishop says, met a girl online and has an online relationship

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 23s24 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
The woman traveled to Riverside to meet Witness #1 #jodiarias #3tvarias

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 14s15 seconds ago
Bishop Parker tells jurors about defense anonymous witness#1 &his relationship with a woman he met online #JodiArias #TravisAlexander #abc15

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 43s43 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Parker knew Witness #1 in 1999 and Wit #1 met a woman online. They had an online relationship #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 19s20 seconds ago
Bishop discusses Witness 1 & his online relationship with a female. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 47s48 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Juan- During time TA was living there did ever use computer? P-I didn't see him use it and no one in my family saw him use it #jodiarias

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq 50s51 seconds ago
@michaelbkiefer: Parker and his family never saw Alexander use the computer in the house. #jodiarias

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 1m1 minute ago
#JuanMartinez questions Bishop Parker about computer in living rm Parker: Never saw #TravisAlexander use it, but Jake did #abc15 #JodiArias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 29s29 seconds ago
Bishop's family members never saw Travis Alexander use their computer in the living room. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 41s41 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Parker had a computer in his living room #jodiarias #3tvarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 47s47 seconds ago
Parker and his family never saw Alexander use the computer in the house. #jodiarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 1m1 minute ago
Bishop never saw Travis Alexander using his computer in his living room. #jodiarias

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq 1m1 minute ago
ALL NEW ALL #JODIARIAS @TheGoldPatrol tonight 7:30pmET! Here is the link: http://www.spreecast.com/events/the-gold-patrol-jodiarias-rebutted …
View photo

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 2m2 minutes ago
Bishop kept his computer in his living room. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 22s23 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Jake had a bedroom in Parker's office TA was in a different part of house when he was there #jodiarias #3tvarias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 27s28 seconds ago
Martinez gets to the computer in the living room. Says that Alexander moved out and another named Jake moved in. #jodiarias

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 30s31 seconds ago
#JodiArias preoccupied 2day--not paying as close as attention to testimony as she did when the defense was laying out their side #abc15

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 35s36 seconds ago
Jake & Travis never lived together at The Bishop's house in Riverside. Travis left in August. Jake moved in, in September. #jodiarias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 19s20 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
Parker's son David lived there, Jake was there late Aug-Nov 2000...not when TA was there #jodiarias #3tvarias

Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 35s36 seconds ago
Juan mentions someone named "Jake" who lived with the Bishop. Jake lived in what now is an office above the garage. #jodiarias

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 1m1 minute ago
#TravisAlexander lived with Bishop Parker in August 2000 #JodiArias #abc15

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 1m1 minute ago
Martinez asks Parker if he knew Alexander. Since 1999. Alexander was recently returned from his mission. June-Aug 2000, lived in Parker home

MaryEllen Resendez ‏@maryellenabc15 42s43 seconds ago
#JuanMartinez questions Bishop Parker on meeting #TravisAlexander 1999: Parker: He had just came back from his Mission #abc15 #JodiArias

Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ 44s45 seconds ago Phoenix, AZ
June or early July of 2000 TA moved in with Parker. He moved out in first part of Aug in 2000 #jodiarias #3tvarias"

 

[mydirtysecret]

I have a question for those who know more about the Mormon faith that I. When you "confess" to the Bishop, is the confession a privileged communication? Maybe the Bishop has an attorney in case the DT asks for specifics as to what TA and DR actually told the Bishop in order to advise as to whether or not the information is protected.

Yes what you confess to Your bishop is between you, your bishop and God. And that's Exactly why the Mormon church gave him an attorney was to make sure that remains between themn and God

 

[StarrChance]

Scads of the scantily clad...

And, staying on topic, what Gus Searcy said about JA's apparel and accoutrements:

"She was always dressed very feminine but very conservative."

He also described her dress as "classy... appropriate... professional".

Now, I'll be the last guy ever accused of possessing ladies' fashion expertise, but c'mon, Gus!

View attachment 68397

View attachment 68399
View attachment 68400
View attachment 68401

Other words like provocative and revealing seem more apt descriptors.

Except for that stupid t-shirt she made after she killed TA, of course.

OMG... So sick :gasp:

 

[Kamille]

Court doc filed Oct. 22, 2013 by JA to remove Nurmi. It's like a peek into the mind of a mad woman.

http://wildabouttrial.com/court_docs/jodi-arias-nurmi-motion.pdf

Wow...thanks for posting that. I've never read it. To me, it's also a peek into just who is putting on this mitigation phase. Everything she says in there indicates that Nurmi knew she was using her minions to fabricate "evidence" to do this mock, trash TA some more, retrial her way and that he wanted no part of it. Sounds like he was out looking for ACTUAL mitigating evidence by trying to find people who would stand up and speak for her (the penpal?) and she was using her internet friends to find people to lie and trash Travis some more. While Willmott was gathering up some more "experts" from the Geff's CA pool to help her out with that.

I do believe after that letter was submitted to JSS, and he was forced to continue on, Nurmi just said "okay Missy...we'll do it your way and watch it implode". I've thought all through this mitigation phase that Nurmi was taking a back seat, letting Willmott take the lead since JA "trusts" her so much and he's just there to make sure all the i's are dotted and the t's are crossed in that she will have NO appeal issues. She can't claim ineffective assistance of counsel because he's gone to bat for her on everything she's wanted. Other than "porngate", when it appeared like BN was telling them he had rock solid evidence of tons and tons of *advertiser censored* on TA's computer and Nurmi may have thought it was actually something useful, but then also imploded when BN went running back to slime highway and Sue had to clean up on aisle 3 with his "unknown comic" appearance, has Nurmi even questioned a witness? It's been so long and drawn out I can't remember.

Looks like he was on deck to deal with the Bishop today but after that one, two punch testimony from both Deanna and the Bishop, even he had to request a break to step back and figure out how to proceed. It'll be interesting to see what slime JA and her "girls", JW and MDLR, come up with over the 4 day break to get Nurmi to ask him. After that, I think Nurmi will deal with the Detective on the computer porngate stuff and maybe that'll be it? He'll keep watching for things that he needs to file motions for and dealing with issues that Willmott misses due to her incompetance (Deanna saying today that she had spoken to the Bishop so KN saying she may be recalled...obviously Willmott missed that and didn't question her about it at the time) to keep them from being an issue on appeal and let the girls run the rest of the show? As lead attorney, does he have to give the closing argument?

MOO

 

[wendiesan]

DR is such a strong, vibrant, healthy young woman she is the absolute polar opposite of JA et al, IMO.

 

[My-Future-Ex-Husband]

Jeffrey Evan Gold ‏@jeffgoldesq · 9m9 minutes ago
Forgot a #JodiArias Q tonight: Nurmi wanted to recall Deanna because she said she spoke to the Bishop. Juan said supbpeona 2 make it harder.

https://twitter.com/jeffgoldesq/status/560644469750792194

With regards to this and JW wanting to know exactly what was said between Deanna and the Bishop, isn't that privileged?

Edit: I see this has been asked already.

 

[RickshawFan]

Is she *advertiser censored*-eyed? Cross-eyed? Astigmatism?

Not astigmatism: I have that and it doesn't make my eyes look in different directions. She is cross-eyed or has strabismus or something. It's probably exacerbated by looking in the mirror at herself overly much, especially in profile. Usually this can be corrected, at least somewhat. I'll bet she was too vain to undergo the treatment.

 

[5bigfish5]

Yes what you confess to Your bishop is between you, your bishop and God. And that's Exactly why the Mormon church gave him an attorney was to make sure that remains between themn and God

Sooooooo, In short order, I assume? The DT is going to try and discredit the Bishop...when he says he can't reveal certain things.

There was a case here, that took years and years to wind through the courts. Atty/Client privilege was broken, basically because the dude offed.

I'm glad the Bishop came prepared.