J17 has retained an attorney to defend herself and remains under police protection.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news.../jodi-arias-juror17-bill-montgomery/70221732/
My heart bleedeth not!
J17 has retained an attorney to defend herself and remains under police protection.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news.../jodi-arias-juror17-bill-montgomery/70221732/
There is a lot of speculation regarding what PT knew about J17 prior to her selection on the jury but no links have been provided to back up those claims. Please provide links when you are posting as if it is a fact. This is how rumors are started and we want to be clear on this.
Thanks, Lambchop
Just wanted to add about the juror foreman's interview.
They DID see Jodi's behavior: Whispering to MLDR, Wilmott. Having fun. Smiling. Coloring. No remorse. Also, she did NOT like DeMarte.
YES!
:happydance: :happydance: :happydance:
When this all first came out after the verdict I said this mistake is on the state (PT). There were waving red flags with this juror just based on the things she did disclose, and yet the state let her on the panel. It appears there was enough info to excuse her without the state having to use any of their limited peremptory challenges.
For some reason very few want to or will acknowledge the painful truth that the PT made this error. All blame has been placed on J17 for getting on the panel and for not proactively self-disclosing during voir dire all the reasons they should exclude her. Well, that's the voir dire process and if she answered the questions posed and answered truthfully then it's not her fault the state didn't ask the right questions or do any further inquiry. IF she lied then that is on her, but so far I haven't seen evidence of lying, just a lot of speculation that she must have lied and 'obviously' lied.
J17 has retained an attorney to defend herself and remains under police protection.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news.../jodi-arias-juror17-bill-montgomery/70221732/
I understand what you are saying. I believe she may have had good intentions going on this jury, but, something tells me she is not the sharpest knife in the drawer and discussed this case with friends and family that may have influenced her thought process. Of course, we do not have proof of this. Going in deliberations and not budging is suspicious, IMO. I do think that some people see JA in person and see how tiny she is, therefore, how can she commit this horrible crime unless she had a good reason to -> abused woman. Also, Dr. F and Geff may have some sparked some emotions within her.
I'm so impressed that this jury took everything in, including all the obfuscation and distraction of the defense, and came out with such an accurate picture of reality.
Obviously a subject with which he feels comfortable, and believes to be universally applicable and exploitable.I also read in TrialDiaries Foreman interview that they saw her testimony as 'rehearsed'.
Isn't it something that all the time the def spent on the *advertiser censored*, they said "it's didn't even matter, nor was even discussed", that included J17!! Nurm just had to keep talking about it because it was important to him, since that's what his law practice boasts.
that place looks like a landmine of OSHA violations, imo. Her long fingers and hair drape might just cause her own demise by reaching in or leaning over any one of those machines or conveyors. [emoji57]Perryville Print Shop. Quite the business they have there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP73c8CexHc
J17 has retained an attorney to defend herself and remains under police protection.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news.../jodi-arias-juror17-bill-montgomery/70221732/
J17 has retained an attorney to defend herself and remains under police protection.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news.../jodi-arias-juror17-bill-montgomery/70221732/
:giggle: I love the disclaimer at the top: "Sorry, we cannot send from one inmate to another". JA is soooo screwed.
I wasn't aware he said that, that's disappointing. Maybe with time and perspective he'll realize that if he and the rest of the jury could see the truth, it should also have been obvious to a professional with access to the same information, and in that light it makes her testimony intentionally biased, and her motives less than honorable.Me too. Which makes the foreman's take on the DT's witnesses even more baffling. He says the jury liked and listened to MF. WTH? And that they were torn between the testimonies of Geffy and DM. WTH?
He did say that they realized in deliberations that the DT's portrayal of Travis was false, but he didn't say anything about MF and Geffy's paid role in creating that false impression for them. Curious. Maybe the interview just didn't cover that part (just that Geffy shouldn't have returned for round 2).
I'd very much hate for MF or Geffy to find any solace in what the jury has to say about them.
Yea nice set up - in which one wrong move could cost a hand.that place looks like a landmine of OSHA violations, imo. Her long fingers and hair drape might just cause her own demise by reaching in or leaning over any one of those machines or conveyors. [emoji57]
J17 has retained an attorney to defend herself and remains under police protection.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news.../jodi-arias-juror17-bill-montgomery/70221732/
J17 has retained an attorney to defend herself and remains under police protection.
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news.../jodi-arias-juror17-bill-montgomery/70221732/
She knew the judge would have to air it and the psychopath doesn't want us to see it because we all see right through it.I still don't have clarity on why she made that choice. Not that a sociopath's reasoning ever makes sense. And she won't be able to appeal on it now at all. I just wonder what she was up to...other than exerting what very little control she still had.
What could possibly take 30 days for Jodi to "get in order?" Packing up her 100.00 a week commissary stash?