Droc BF post # 1978 - 7 March 2015
"
Yes Mr Plod! Go for it! All of the above is manipulation of details. The is a team of people standing behind you passing info back and forth.No interview! No alibi! And a moe than reasonable chance the body is where I say, and not to much difficulty probing!
More negotiation!"
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/claremont-serial-killings.985161/page-80#post-37338582
Droc BF post # 2218 - 10 March 2015
"I did not mention them as such, they were mentioned in letter by Commissioner Mathews,and you have advanced it for your own ends, to this, so I say to you,
I will discuss it with them and we will take it from. You may well be rushing this towards a conclusion.
And the Gerard Ross link may well be there! The cortina station wagon and the description of two men. And also if you go back to the book the devils garden,and the section I posted where Mr. Napper asks Mr.Barclay about their throats being cut, Mr. Barclay also alludes to another method of (MO) killing, as in strangulation if circumstances change.
Droc BF post # 2222 - 10 March 2015
"Get back to Gerard Ross. I will discuss the other today and I will be in touch. It is perhaps time to test the case you are attempting to establish, way out there in the public domain, throw the door open to let the press hack into this, and not just the WA press, because you intend to attempt to solve this without having to be asked, did Mr. Caporn lie to Mr. Glennon? This all now needs to be debated in the full public domain, and where I will answer all question with the knowledge you and/or the police will do the same."
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/claremont-serial-killings.985161/page-89#post-37370532
Droc / Noel negotiating with the police. Mmm.
Interesting his final post on BF was 18 March 2015. Then he disappeared online and passed a month later.
Then the news article on 20 March regarding new promising leads, blitz attack and "detectives are looking very closely at other non-fatal crimes that may have been carried out by the perpetrator, before Sarah Spiers went missing, including break-ins and attempted abductions". Who had prior form for these?
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wes...-serial-killings/story-fnhocxo3-1227272029180
Step back to Droc BF post # 1326 - 12 February 2015
"He traveled frequently with a woman in his taxi who worked the streets of Northbridge. She was a heroin addict, and previously charged her in WA for trafficking heroin in to a convicted murderer. After the Claremont crimes she moved interstate and was arrested with a male over a shooting incident, and received five years in prison.
I believe she was the lure into the taxi, and a stun gun was also available. No I believe they were taken to a factory unit in wood streets at the end of Stirling Highway."
Surmising that a stun gun may constitute a blitz attack.
I discount the factory comment given the deception throughout the BF posts over the Myaree and Henderson addresses and the suspicious fire at his Myaree house (435 Marmion) one week prior to his December 2014 MCS interview.
Droc BF Post # 2015 - 8 March 2015
"Did you live in Sparks Road or Marmion Street during 1996/1997?
"Again! You got it wrong! You don watch and you dont read! This was raised earlier relating to another question! I selected two Stat decks at random and there were two batches of stat decks signed some time apart, and I have obviously selected two with different addresses. Both legal mail addresses.
Had to go to a lot of trouble to protect my *advertiser censored*, haven't i?"
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/claremont-serial-killings.985161/page-81#post-37339973
Droc BF post # 2629 - 18 March 2015.
"but then I recalled another one of your (that arrogance again) flippant comments
after the murder of Ciara as we sat around the table at Marmion street discussing these murders, you, me, Karen, and sweet heather, and let me quote you! “I think people will be really surprised when they find out who did it (pause) really surprised (pause) that is if they ever catch him (pause) or them.”
Does the flippant one have anything to add, whilst he still has the opportunity?