SnooperDuper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
- Messages
- 7,676
- Reaction score
- 2,837
Well, incidentally, it is exactly 1/2 a year to DM's trial for the murder of TB today. 4-5 months after that, they will throw away the key to his jail cell.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you have a link for the statistics on that? We have yet to find out who ordered the incinerator much more info is needed to put to a jury.imo
It is a fact that we do not know the status of the investigation but we do know that DM has not been charged, another fact.
He lived with his son, his son is the most likely to have found him, as would have been the case in any family home.
Im sure the truth will be revealed in due course at trial.
That goes without saying.
I dont believe LB last calls were to DM. Also all but one appeared to be unanswered judging by the bill.imo
Such evidence can often exonerate an accused. Witnesses for the accused and other evidence may come to light.
Yes OK we will, and on whether or not there is lots to go on.
Do you have a link for the statistics on that? We have yet to find out who ordered the incinerator much more info is needed to put to a jury.imo
No link, just years of following true crime. You're welcome to research the statistics if you feel that is not sufficient though. I don't count that as a fact however, just that it's not suspicious or unusual for a killer to have evidence and even remains on property owned by them. What is unusual is for someone to set up someone else so spectacularly as has been suggested in this case and I don't believe I've ever heard of a case like that.
The incinerator was purchased by and for Millard Air. At the time, DM was the CEO. It was found on his personal property with the burned remains of TB in it. A man whom he called on a burner phone and went on a test drive with and who was never seen alive again after pulling out of his driveway with DM at the wheel. Doesn't matter who ordered it. It's where it was found and what was in it that counts.
It is a fact that we do not know the status of the investigation but we do know that DM has not been charged, another fact.
There is a publication ban and there have been no preliminary hearings. We do not know what else DM may yet be charged with, if anything. As far as we know no one has been charged but it is still a fact that the HD and trailer was stolen and that it was found in DM's hangar. I agree with another poster (Snooper I believe) who stated that it's better for the prosecution to use the possible evidence of other stolen vehicles found in the hangar to bolster the motive for the TB case than to start breaking down charges and risk having that info be deemed inadmissable as it is a separate case. I guess we'll have to see what makes it in as evidence.
He lived with his son, his son is the most likely to have found him, as would have been the case in any family home.
Im sure the truth will be revealed in due course at trial.
I'm sure it will. In the meantime, the fact is that LE believe they have enough evidence to charge him with the murder of his father. The only fact we've seen that may relate to that case is the arrest of 3 men for trafficking a gun to DM. At present, we don't really have any facts regarding the evidence LE has in that case though.
That goes without saying.
Then I don't understand why the fact that DM has not been convicted of anything yet keeps coming up as somehow relevent on a forum in which we pretty much discuss evidence on cases prior to and during trial when there are only charges against the suspects and we very rarely discuss them after conviction.
I dont believe LB last calls were to DM. Also all but one appeared to be unanswered judging by the bill.imo
Her final phone bill is pretty direct evidence. Her final calls were to DM according to that bill.
Such evidence can often exonerate an accused. Witnesses for the accused and other evidence may come to light.
Who do you suppose will be presenting evidence to "exonerate" DM and for which murder?
Yes OK we will, and on whether or not there is lots to go on.
Sorry Matou, I couldn't find any cases for your assignment.
Here's a few for yours Tamarind.
Right now we have Douglas Garland, Dellen Millard and Mark Smich going to trial for no body murder charges. In the past....
Theres R vs. Pritchard, a decision affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada. Its a 2007 decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeal which involved a man convicted of first-degree murder despite the fact that the victims body has never been found.
Theres R vs. Ratte, another B.C. case where a husband was convicted of second-degree murder despite the fact his wifes body was never found. The Supreme Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal.
Theres R vs. Wristen, a 1999 Ontario case where another husband was convicted of second-degree murder though the body of his wife has never been found; that was upheld by the court of appeal.
https://damianpenny.wordpress.com/2014/07/15/murder-without-a-body/
There's probably more but I was never very good at homework.
I just remembered the recent case of serial killer, Cody Legebokoff, convicted of 4 murders, one of whom was Natasha Montgomery whose body was never found.
My point was not that he was not a killer, it was that he admitted to being there and assisting. He himself put himself at the scene and admitted involvement. My point was that there is usually evidence that sways a jury one way or the other and an admission usually helps them decide. JMO