giagreen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
- Messages
- 2,304
- Reaction score
- 141
Exactly.BBM: We (the public) have no idea what evidence LE has. No one has been cleared.
Exactly.BBM: We (the public) have no idea what evidence LE has. No one has been cleared.
Has it been mentioned what time was on the receipt? That would likely give an indication of what time they left the store. Such a small store I can't imagine they were in there very long, but they could have eaten inside or outside I suppose, so maybe it wouldn't help that much.
Unless these animals have delayed digestive systems.. what possible good would scat be when the child went missing 3 months ago? JMOThat's not true. They are taking samples of scat from the area. If they were so sure the parents were involved would they be doing that?
Unless these animals have delayed digestive systems.. what possible good would scat be when the child went missing 3 months ago? JMO
That's a great idea, Arnie. I find it hard to believe that more focus hasn't been placed on the possibility that he fell into the water.Take a one gallon plastic milk jug and fill it right up with water , put the cap on and place the jug in water , it floats (sinks) about the same as a body. Have somebody drop the jug in the middle of the creek and then go searching for it 5 minutes later.
It will have disappeared , and as it moved semi-submerged toward large rocks the current will draw the jug down under the rock and hold it there. If there is a large enough opening under the rocks it could get drawn in a couple of more feet than you could reach unless you were submerged yourself. A child's body is about the same diameter as the milk jug.
The milk jug will not come to the surface , on the other hand wood , trees , and sticks always try to float as they move down a creek , that is why you see all the (wood) debris everywhere .
If I was at the creek right now that is how I would search , I would tie a string to the jug and toss it in the water near those large rocks until I found a place where it went far and deep into a cavern.
Take a one gallon plastic milk jug and fill it right up with water , put the cap on and place the jug in water , it floats (sinks) about the same as a body. Have somebody drop the jug in the middle of the creek and then go searching for it 5 minutes later.
It will have disappeared , and as it moved semi-submerged toward large rocks the current will draw the jug down under the rock and hold it there. If there is a large enough opening under the rocks it could get drawn in a couple of more feet than you could reach unless you were submerged yourself. A child's body is about the same diameter as the milk jug.
The milk jug will not come to the surface , on the other hand wood , trees , and sticks always try to float as they move down a creek , that is why you see all the (wood) debris everywhere .
If I was at the creek right now that is how I would search , I would tie a string to the jug and toss it in the water near those large rocks until I found a place where it went far and deep into a cavern.
That's a great idea, Arnie. I find it hard to believe that more focus hasn't been placed on the possibility that he fell into the water.
That's not really the point. Actually, that's not even what I was talking about. You said nothing els is being done. My point was that's not true. Did they or did they not say that they were going back to take samples of scat? That's it. That's all there was to my point. I don't think the parents have a hand in this but I am also not going to sit and say that LE isn't doing anything els but looking at scat so there for it can't possibly be the parents.Unless these animals have delayed digestive systems.. what possible good would scat be when the child went missing 3 months ago? JMO
Don't know. Perhaps he's confident the water searches were thorough. But from the latest, it sounds like he's back at square one, so maybe it will be revisited. I hope so.I just read one if the early articles this AM that said the sheriff was 100% sure that DeOrr wasn't in the creek, although later in his first interview he said he couldn't rule anything out. I wonder why he felt so certain given that it does seem like such an obvious possibility.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good post. I used to post here early in the case, I have always maintained that DeOrr fell into the creek. I wish they would go back and search the creek again. I really feel he is there. Those banks are steep.Take a one gallon plastic milk jug and fill it right up with water , put the cap on and place the jug in water , it floats (sinks) about the same as a body. Have somebody drop the jug in the middle of the creek and then go searching for it 5 minutes later.
It will have disappeared , and as it moved semi-submerged toward large rocks the current will draw the jug down under the rock and hold it there. If there is a large enough opening under the rocks it could get drawn in a couple of more feet than you could reach unless you were submerged yourself. A child's body is about the same diameter as the milk jug.
The milk jug will not come to the surface , on the other hand wood , trees , and sticks always try to float as they move down a creek , that is why you see all the (wood) debris everywhere .
If I was at the creek right now that is how I would search , I would tie a string to the jug and toss it in the water near those large rocks until I found a place where it went far and deep into a cavern.
Unless these animals have delayed digestive systems.. what possible good would scat be when the child went missing 3 months ago? JMO
That's a great idea, Arnie. I find it hard to believe that more focus hasn't been placed on the possibility that he fell into the water.
I've gone through the latest interview several time, but can't find where it says the FBI's report is complete?