Roselvr
Ask me how to get your loved one in NamUs
This is so good they are doing this for him.I know DNA will show who he is.
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/real-time/the-boy-in-the-box-1957-DNA-philadelphia.html
I don't see them say they're submitting to any genealogy databases.
DNA samples - "What's good about the DNA is you can affirm things to it," Kuhlmeier said in 2015. "So, tips come in and if someone said, 'Oh, I think it was my long-lost brother, my long-lost family relative,' we can do DNA [testing] to dismiss those leads and whether or not those leads are viable to run on.”
Before the boy was buried in Ivy Hill Cemetery, maternal DNA was extracted from his teeth.
The DNA sample was submitted to the University of North Texas and entered in a national familial DNA database. Samples were also added to other local and national databases.
But even with DNA, problems remain. For example, the large civilian DNA databases, such as Ancestry.com, use a mouth swab type of DNA that the boy could not possibly provide.
And the sample that investigators did extract might be of dubious quality.
"I think the sample was degraded," Fleisher said. "If you could have seen how the casket was crumbled, the bones were practically dust, not quite, but time was just very cruel at that grave site."
"I don't know how much DNA was collected," he added. "But they can go back and get a mummy."
Rockne Harmon, an expert in the use of DNA evidence in cold cases, said in a phone interview last year that the window for prosecution starts to close after about 25 years.
“The other thing that struck me was that if you tried to pursue cases that are too old, chances are pretty good that the guy will never show up in a DNA database because he died before the police started to aggressively collect it from people.”
I agree that his DNA likely holds some interesting clues/answers. With Home DNA testing and Genealogy being all the rage right now, there is so much more possibility of finding matches than years ago when had to wait for a suspect etc to compare.
Now you can test with one company, such as Ancestry, or FamilyTree DNA, 23andme etc and upload the Raw Data to GedMatch to expand your search result pool. You can see results from companies you didn't test with. I have seen some amazing things come of this, even if you don't get a close match - a little investigative genealogy can produce amazing results.
I have seen some pretty amazing things come from DNA testing, British Home Children finding their family, Adoptees and Birth Parents finding each other, Baby Doe's who were abandoned finding birth families/parents. Cece Moore is amazing as well, she may even want to assist!
I really hope they go this route! Nothing ventured, nothing gained right!?
The problem is that the genealogy companies want saliva. Colleen Fitzpatrick (forensic genealogist) contacted the Doe named Lyle Stevik's LE to see if the raw data from UNT (NamUs) could be uploaded to any of the databases that support uploads like GEDmatch, Family Tree DNA or My Heritage but they were told UNT will only release the needed string to another government agency because it is too large of a file. Here is the direct quote from Lyle's thread. Click the arrows to go directly to his post if you want to read more
I spoke to Mr. Youmans via email today and he kindly explained the DNA situation to me:I spoke at length with Colleen Fitzpatrick, the woman who solved the Lori Ruff case. The problem is, the DNA profile we have for Lyle is different than one you would get from a company like Ancestry. We need a Y-DNA profile, and from what I have learned, the profile is different. I had hoped to submit our profile to one of the Ancestry companies, but from what I understand, they won’t cooperate, as they don’t want to be associated with Law Enforcement. I understand their reasoning, as they don’t want people to submit a saliva sample to find their ancestors, and wind up getting arrested for some old crime, where their DNA was in CODIS. I’ve tried to get Lyle’s DNA profile from the University of North Texas DNA database, but they won’t release it to me. They said they would give it to another government lab, as the DNA sequence is so long, that a lab would know which section to compare.
If I had known about companies like Ancestry and 23 and me back in 2001, I probably could have obtained a saliva sample from Lyle and submitted it to the private company, but all we took was a blood sample that I submitted to the University of North Texas, and the profile was run through CODIS.
Lane Youmans
Grays Harbor Coroner
We have a thread if anyone is interested
Has anyone done their DNA for genealogy?