Another Year and a Great New Podcast I want YOU to be interviewed!

[UKGuy]

why??
steve Thomas has spelt it out perfectly clearly he believes jonbenet was a victim of coporal cleansing that resulted in serious vaginal trauma.
no sexual assault.
the only one who seems confused about detective Thomas's findings is you... uk.

k-mac,
Oh man, you again. Your like a Punch and Judy show. Yeah, Yeah, I'm guilty as charged, blah, blah ...

Its Steve Thomas' opinion I'd like to hear, you know like maybe he has re-evaluated stuff, many years have passed since he wrote his book, new facts have appeared.

Naturally I assume Steve Thomas might be gracious enough to offer his opinion unlike yourself who claims personal opinion as fact !

.

 

[k-mac]

k-mac,
Oh man, you again. Your like a Punch and Judy show. Yeah, Yeah, I'm guilty as charged, blah, blah ...

Its Steve Thomas' opinion I'd like to hear, you know like maybe he has re-evaluated stuff, many years have passed since he wrote his book, new facts have appeared.

Naturally I assume Steve Thomas might be gracious enough to offer his opinion unlike yourself who claims personal opinion as fact !

.

that's a lie
you can not personally insult posters with untrue accusations.
I do not claim personal opinion as fact.
hence my constant bug bear with you.
your a manipuative player and I enjoy holding you to account. ​

:fence:

( are you a lawyer?)
but don't ever tell lies about me.
truth facts and honesty are paramount to me.

I also think it unfair the disrespectful way you dismiss detective Thomas. he fought a war trying to get justice for jonbenet almost broke him.
he deserves his opinion and findings to be respected.
even your idol kolar doesn't ever dismiss Thomas or his findings.
at the end of the day (here is an opinion for u just for clarification) I reckon kolar went with the opposite theory because the first one didn't get them anywhere but hey.....neither did his .
both these detectives threw everything at this case separately and I admire them both.
I find validation in bdi even though I don't support it.
be nice if you would stop pdi jdi bashing.
the validation is there and you do not have the authority to constantly demand proof to back up statements when you bring the most innuendo to the table and expect it to be accepted.
its hypocrisy and while ever u do it ill call you on it.​

apologies tricia for interrupting the thread.
I just wanted to throw some support to steve Thomas

 

[UKGuy]

that's a lie
you can not personally insult posters with untrue accusations.
I do not claim personal opinion as fact.
hence my constant bug bear with you.
your a manipuative player and I enjoy holding you to account. ​

:fence:

( are you a lawyer?)
but don't ever tell lies about me.
truth facts and honesty are paramount to me.

I also think it unfair the disrespectful way you dismiss detective Thomas. he fought a war trying to get justice for jonbenet almost broke him.
he deserves his opinion and findings to be respected.
even your idol kolar doesn't ever dismiss Thomas or his findings.
at the end of the day (here is an opinion for u just for clarification) I reckon kolar went with the opposite theory because the first one didn't get them anywhere but hey.....neither did his .
both these detectives threw everything at this case separately and I admire them both.
I find validation in bdi even though I don't support it.
be nice if you would stop pdi jdi bashing.
the validation is there and you do not have the authority to constantly demand proof to back up statements when you bring the most innuendo to the table and expect it to be accepted.
its hypocrisy and while ever u do it ill call you on it.​

apologies tricia for interrupting the thread.
I just wanted to throw some support to steve Thomas

k-mac,
You are just causing trouble and messing up threads with your personal vendetta. You made claims of fact that you could not cite a source for, that means what you say is just opinion !

Just saying stuff does not make it true, you have obviously been reading other threads where they criticize BDI, where its all ad hominem based.

You will trash you reputation on the board and risk being banned if you continue, so give it up.


.

 

[sgrump]

People learn and grow and their thinking changes all the time, life isn't stagnant. We have elections every 4 years for this reason, imagine how many people are aghast at what they voted for and created in Washington.

As far as Thomas' theory goes and I read his book multiple times he was certain something had occurred in the bathroom. IMO he's right on the money, what happened was all about the bathroom habits of the 2 young Ramsey kids, it's the smoking gun. They both exhibited the odd behavior of encopresis and this developmental dysfunction has everything to do with Burke being unable to deal with his emotions and anger and struck out Jonbenet.

Thomas and his investigation was crippled by the illegal criminal actions of Alex Hunter.

 

[Deleted member 278]

So, this is now a discussion thread?

 

[BBB167893]

Thomas and his investigation was crippled by the illegal criminal actions of Alex Hunter.

THAT says it all.

 

[Tricia]

Ok. You all have hurt my big fat feelings. When I was younger and more fit I called them my little feelings. Not now though.

Big fat feelings

I was so excited when I saw how many posts were on this thread. I thought "YEEHAAA a bunch of posters want to participate in the podcast". But alas, it was not to be.

Ok, stop with the bickering kids and sign up to be on the podcast. It's all going to be pre-recorded so if you make a mistake we can take it out.

I will ask again; Who wants to participate in a very detailed podcast about the JonBenet case? I want to hear your theories. You will only be identified by your username.

Please, don't hurt me again. My big fat feelings can't take it.

Love,
Tricia

 

[k-mac]

i'd love to participate tricia but ive had a spinal throat operation and am still having pain with talking :-(
looking forward to hearing it though.

I apologise again for hijacking the thread, I just hate double standards ....:blushing:

 

[BoldBear]

I'm really excited to hear this podcast. I enjoyed all the others. Is there something I can do to help make this happen?

 

[Deleted member 278]

Ok. You all have hurt my big fat feelings. When I was younger and more fit I called them my little feelings. Not now though.

Big fat feelings

I was so excited when I saw how many posts were on this thread. I thought "YEEHAAA a bunch of posters want to participate in the podcast". But alas, it was not to be.

Ok, stop with the bickering kids and sign up to be on the podcast. It's all going to be pre-recorded so if you make a mistake we can take it out.

I will ask again; Who wants to participate in a very detailed podcast about the JonBenet case? I want to hear your theories. You will only be identified by your username.

Please, don't hurt me again. My big fat feelings can't take it.

Love,
Tricia

Post under "Websleuths News" at top of page? Maybe not a lot of people are seeing this.

 

[Tricia]

Every Monday, all day, will be dedicated to creating this podcast. I have no idea how long it will take.

I will PM those who have volunteered to be interviewed and set up a time for us to chat.

The phone calls will be recorded using Google Voice. However, the recording will only start when you hear the lovely Google Robot Voice say, "This call is now being recorded."

Come on don't be shy. Sign up. Be a part of this historic podcast.

This will be different than any other podcast. I can promise you Lin Wood will hate it. LOL

 

[Tadpole12]

i'd love to participate tricia but ive had a spinal throat operation and am still having pain with talking :-(
looking forward to hearing it though.

I apologise again for hijacking the thread, I just hate double standards ....:blushing:

oh!
k-mac
Speedy Recovery!

 

[Tadpole12]

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...e-a-Part-of&num=1&hl=en&gl=ca&strip=0&vwsrc=1
<div class="message">Hi Everyone, <br />
<br />
21 years. Let that sink in. 21 years since the death of JonBenet. WOW<br />
<br />
What I am very grateful for is the fact you all keep coming back to discuss the case. You all continue to work on the<br />
evidence. <br />
<br />
I am very honored that you have chosen Websleuths to continue your discussion about the JonBenet Ramsey case. <br />
<br />
In the next day or two, I will have a Websleuths radio show ready for you about JonBenet.<br />
<br />
Since the CBS lawsuit was filed by Lin Wood pretty much everyone connected to the case cannot talk to anybody. Especially Websleuths. <img src="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Smilie" class="inlineimg" /><br />
<br />
So that means will not have any people directly involved in the case but I have two of the sharpest minds on the net joining us. <br />
<br />
Cherokee is an amazing and talented woman. Cherokee uses her talents to take apart the ransom note bit by bit. You'll love what she has to say. <br />
<br />
Cynic is a genius and a nice guy. He is the perfect combination of a human being. <img src="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Smilie" class="inlineimg" /> He will discuss the DNA in terms that even I can understand. <br />
He peels away the hype the Ramseys use to try and show the DNA belongs to an intruder.<br />
<br />
By the time Cherokee and Cynic are done you will see there is no question that there was absolutely not an intruder in the house that night and he did not kill JonBenet. <br />
<br />
Also, have a great message for you all from Steve Thomas.<br />
<br />
To top things off world-renowned professional handwriting expert Cina Wong leaves me with a quote and it's a doozy. It's cryptic but it is really good.<br />
<br />
I'll post the link to that interview as soon as I am done editing. <br />
<br />
Take care and let's all hope that in the coming year JonBenet Ramsey will finally get the justice she deserves

 

[Tadpole12]

"Also, have a great message for you all from Steve Thomas."- Tricia

"To top things off world-renowned professional handwriting expert Cina Wong leaves me with a quote and it's a doozy. It's cryptic but it is really good. - Tricia
***************
Will this material still be included in the Webcast?

 

[BBB167893]

Every Monday, all day, will be dedicated to creating this podcast. I have no idea how long it will take.

I will PM those who have volunteered to be interviewed and set up a time for us to chat.

The phone calls will be recorded using Google Voice. However, the recording will only start when you hear the lovely Google Robot Voice say, "This call is now being recorded."

Come on don't be shy. Sign up. Be a part of this historic podcast.

This will be different than any other podcast. I can promise you Lin Wood will hate it. LOL

Next Monday works out great for me!

 

[HamSandwich]

Every Monday, all day, will be dedicated to creating this podcast. I have no idea how long it will take.

I will PM those who have volunteered to be interviewed and set up a time for us to chat.

The phone calls will be recorded using Google Voice. However, the recording will only start when you hear the lovely Google Robot Voice say, "This call is now being recorded."

Come on don't be shy. Sign up. Be a part of this historic podcast.

This will be different than any other podcast. I can promise you Lin Wood will hate it. LOL

I will do it next Monday (1/15/18) as well at anytime.

 

[HamSandwich]

This is not aimed at anyone in particular at all and I hope to not offend anyone, but I am surprised that more people haven't volunteered to give their perspective considering the hundreds of thousands of posts in relation to this precious little girl.
It makes my heart hurt and I hardly ever post because I feel I cannot control myself when it comes to JonBenet.

 

[Userid]

This is not aimed at anyone in particular at all and I hope to not offend anyone, but I am surprised that more people haven't volunteered to give their perspective considering the hundreds of thousands of posts in relation to this precious little girl.
It makes my heart hurt and I hardly ever post because I feel I cannot control myself when it comes to JonBenet.

Honestly, I feel I don't know enough about the case to be interviewed; it would be a disservice if I was interviewed. I've been studying this case for a couple years now, but nonetheless, I feel the only people who should be interviewed are those with the most knowledge of the case.

 

[Tadpole12]

Ya for sure HamSandwich
Don't feel disheartened.

The WS 'in house' JBR sleuths
will surely cover all the bases
with their cumulative knowledge.

 

[BoldBear]

This is not aimed at anyone in particular at all and I hope to not offend anyone, but I am surprised that more people haven't volunteered to give their perspective considering the hundreds of thousands of posts in relation to this precious little girl.
It makes my heart hurt and I hardly ever post because I feel I cannot control myself when it comes to JonBenet.

No offence here either. I'm really excited about this show. I'm just trying to finish-up my project first. It's too soon to talk about it for me. If I was to say anything, it would be about parts of this case that waste everyone's time: the boot print, the train room window, the locations where they found tDNA. We obsess about what evidence we don't have...if only the boots were found...did John stage the train room window...obviously Burke used his pocket knife to cut the cord...if only the murder would have dropped his driver's licence.

Let's focus on what we have.

There's one detail that's been on my mind lately. Patsy said that only she and the pediatrician were allowed near JB's genitalia. But we know that JB would sit on the toilet and call out for any adult to wipe her behind. I know this is a mother claiming that she was a mama bear to reassure everyone she protected her cub, but it's clearly not a true statement. Any adult who answered her call would have been in a position that was one you'd only give a trusted caregiver. Patsy answered the question in that way because she really did believe she was a protective mother. I'm not sure she understood her mistake and that it could put her daughter in danger.