EuTuCroquet, I think I love you!
:blowkiss:
I don’t think. I know! Amazing incredible posts!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EuTuCroquet, I think I love you!
:blowkiss:
I am talking of my experience of my son graduating HS in Florida. A lot of his friends joined the military because they couldn't get a decent paying job to support themselves with.
It might be different elsewhere? And kids getting out of college, finding difficulty in getting a job as well. It's alright if you only want to earn minimum wage and live at home i suppose.
Not sure how easy it is to pull a kid out of school just whenever and immediately start home-schooling.
From the very first day of the strike, the unions shut down every public school in the state, with 34,000 workers out. As the strike rolled on, a steady stream of thousands protested at the state capitolmany wearing bunny earswhile others staffed picket lines around their schools. At the same time, the parents of over 270,000 kids simultaneously supported the strikers, while scrambling to find places for their kids to stay. On Tuesday, February 27, the governor sat down and hammered out an agreement.
If "What good is the education when there won't be any jobs for them when they leave school?" is how you feel IMO today's walk out shouldn't be a problem.
OT-ish
Agreed, blue.
They’re working, but comparatively speaking, they’re earning less at their jobs compared to people their age were 20, 30, 40 or 50 years ago. That’s gotta suck, imho.
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...nBjUQFgghMAc&usg=AOvVaw1UWsBtFZQkuwxrq4FM5EK-
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...nBjUQFggNMAA&usg=AOvVaw2486eeijChB0pigYS3kEXW
https://www.google.com/url?q=http:/...nBjUQFggQMAE&usg=AOvVaw0vl4WzQKM4gUz0EprvRa5O
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...nBjUQFggbMAU&usg=AOvVaw2afuGkpR5ftvBEdDaEIY9U
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...nBjUQFggZMAQ&usg=AOvVaw3Mpn-1D0_09nO8wp4ZSHOT
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...nBjUQFggeMAY&usg=AOvVaw2wvinPf8Cm3ftkZyKfUrUS
BBM, I would agree with that because when kids are meant to be at school and are present for the day, if anything should happen to any of the students while they are meant to be at school, the school can be held legally accountable for that.
As long as a child is in school it is the school's responsibility for what happens there. All IMO.
But the school’s closed as ... someone ... cleans up after a mass shooting where dozens of kids and adults were wounded and killed. And, besides, it’s crawling with cops rn! [emoji8]
Oh dear, think about that. That would have to be the worst job in the world.
It would be impossible to do this in numbers big enough to make a difference. Whole school districts. Single parents quit their jobs to homeschool their children whether or not they're qualified, and then the gov't spends kajillions (estimated) of dollars to equip schools and train special weapons teams. We can't even pay teachers and fund schools the way we should.
Last month, in WV:
The strikers won all five of their demands by shutting down every public school in the state.
That's what it takes.
I cannot believe my tax dollars are being wasted on this walkout.
My post was really in regard to making a statement to the Govt. about school shootings, that why should parents send their kids to school if schools can't be made safe for their children to attend them. The onus is really on the Govt. because they are the ones that institute the laws that it is mandatory for kids to attend school in the first place. And therefore the onus is also on them to keep those places safer.
Like getting strafed by bullets?
I do see your point, but do you really want schools to be guarded like fortresses?
My post was really in regard to making a statement to the Govt. about school shootings, that why should parents send their kids to school if schools can't be made safe for their children to attend them. The onus is really on the Govt. because they are the ones that institute the laws that it is mandatory for kids to attend school in the first place. And therefore the onus is also on them to keep those places safer.
Aren't American tax dollars used mainly for warfare? How many trillions of dollars is the country in deficit right now?
I do see your point, but do you really want schools to be guarded like fortresses?
15http://time.com/5195960/national-school-walkout-march-14/
Thousands of students and teachers began walking out of their classrooms on Wednesday, March 14 as part of the the #Enough! National School Walkout to raise awareness about issues of school safety and the impact of gun violence. The nationwide march, organized by Womens March Youth Empower, began at 10 a.m. Many marches lasted 17 minutes, to represent each of the victims of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
...............................
https://www.womensmarch.com/enough-faq
https://www.womensmarch.com/team/
Who knew Linda Sarour was behind the school walk-out?
Seriously, you cannot make this up, you just can't.
I need to get to bed.
:bed:
My post was really in regard to making a statement to the Govt. about school shootings, that why should parents send their kids to school if schools can't be made safe for their children to attend them. The onus is really on the Govt. because they are the ones that institute the laws that it is mandatory for kids to attend school in the first place. And therefore the onus is also on them to keep those places safer.
All 100k of them??