Australia Australia - Corryn Rayney, 44, Como, WA, 7 August 2007

Lloyd Rayney awarded $2.6m defamation payout over 'prime' and 'only' murder suspect comments
ABC News
BY JOANNA MENAGH
46 MINUTES AGO (as at 14:30 AEDT 20 December 2017)

‘Perth barrister Lloyd Rayney has received one of Australia's largest payouts after being defamed when police named him as the "prime" and "only" suspect in the murder of his wife, Corryn, more than 10 years ago.

Today Supreme Court justice John Chaney awarded Mr Rayney a total of $2.62 million, including interest, for the income he lost over a three-year period from when the comments were made, in September 2007, to December 2010, when he was charged with her murder.

The sum includes the $600,000 payment Justice Chaney last week ruled Mr Rayney should receive for the non-economic loss he suffered to compensate him for "the damage to his personal and business reputation, personal hurt and distress" caused by the defamation.’

‘Mr Rayney had sought a payout of more than $10 million dollars, arguing the defamatory comments had affected his income for the entire 10 years since they were made.

However Justice Chaney found the comments only affected his income for the three years from when they were made to when he was charged with murder, saying any losses after that point, were "entirely attributable to other causes."’

Read more at:

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-...-two-million-dollar-defamation-payout/9275316
 
Lloyd Rayney mounts legal challenge for higher defamation payout
ABC News
BY JOANNA MENAGH AND JAMES CARMODY
UPDATED ABOUT 6 HOURS AGO (as at 04:31 AEDT 1 February 2018)

‘Perth barrister Lloyd Rayney has lodged an appeal against the record $2.6 million payout he was awarded for being defamed by police who named him the "prime" and "only" suspect in the murder of his wife Corryn, more than 10 years ago.

Mr Rayney had argued at his Supreme Court defamation trial last year he should receive about $11 million for the financial and "non-economic" losses he suffered when a senior detective made the comments at a packed media conference, in September 2007, about six weeks after Mrs Rayney's body was found in a deep grave in Kings Park.

While Justice John Chaney found the comments were defamatory, he ruled they only affected Mr Rayney for three years, from when they were made, to when he was charged with his wife's murder in December 2010.’

‘Mr Rayney's lawyer Martin Bennett told the ABC Mr Rayney had lodged an appeal because he wanted the payment to include his losses from when the comments were made until the verdict in his defamation trial against the state of WA late last year — a period of 10 years.’

‘He is yet to receive any of the defamation payout.

His lawyers lodged documents with WA's Court of Appeal late this afternoon.

An announcement is expected tomorrow on whether the state will lodge its own appeal.’

‘It is expected the appeal will be heard later this year.’

Read more at:

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-...es-appeal-against-defamation-decision/9381000
 
Lloyd Rayney unfit to practise law after 'disgraceful' recordings, false evidence: tribunal
ABC News
UPDATED ABOUT AN HOUR AGO [as at 10:00 AEST 12 May 2018]

‘Perth barrister Lloyd Rayney is facing the prospect of being permanently banned from practising law for "unlawfully" recording his murdered wife's conversations without her consent and giving false evidence about it to a court hearing.

It comes just months after Mr Rayney won a multi-million-dollar payout for being defamed by WA Police.

In decisions that were suppressed until now, the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) described Mr Rayney's conduct as "disgraceful and dishonourable", saying it was satisfied he "was not a fit and proper person to engage in legal practice".

The SAT found Mr Rayney had engaged in professional misconduct by "knowingly giving false evidence on oath" to a 2009 Magistrates Court hearing when he said Corryn Rayney knew, and consented to, the recording of about nine of her conversations on a handheld dictaphone between April and July 2007.

The Rayneys' marriage was breaking down at the time, and Mr Rayney claimed in his evidence that he made the recordings to try to refute "an insinuation" his wife was making about him, and that he had copied all of the conversations onto a CD.

However, the SAT found that evidence was "untrue", and that when Mr Rayney gave it he "had the intention of misleading the court".

It also found he had contravened the Surveillances Devices Act when he made the recordings and that he knew he was "acting unlawfully" in recording private conversations without Ms Rayney's consent.

The recordings were made in the months before Ms Rayney disappeared in August 2007 after attending a boot-scooting class in the suburb of Bentley.’

To read more, click on the headline (above).

Related:

Lloyd Rayney’s fitness to practise law to be challenged again
 
Interesting article from 2017:

Cops adopt suspect as right term
Gabrielle Knowles
Chief Crime Reporter
The West Australian
Thursday, 16 March 2017 3:35AM

‘WA Police are about to start using the term “suspect” as standard practice despite it being at the centre of a multimillion-dollar defamation claim.

Officers have been told to stop describing someone implicated in a crime as a “person of interest” and use the term suspect.

It comes amid the defamation trial of Lloyd Rayney. Then Det-Sen. Sgt Jack Lee claimed Mr Rayney was the “prime” and “only” suspect in his wife Corryn’s murder, remarks Mr Rayney says damaged his legal career and reputation. He was found not guilty of murder.

A WA Police spokeswoman said the change was not prompted by the Rayney case but was made to adopt terms consistent with legislation and contemporary investigative practices.’

To read more, click on the headline (above).
 
'Fighting for the truth': Lloyd Rayney calls for new investigation into wife's murder

'Fighting for the truth': Lloyd Rayney calls for new investigation into wife's murder
14 October 2018 — 11:39pm
Extract>

Perth barrister Lloyd Rayney is calling for new investigation into his wife’s murder, claiming a different police team is needed to find his wife’s real killer.

The father-of-two once named as the “prime and only” suspect in the investigation into Corryn Rayney’s murder – and who was later acquitted of the crime in the WA Supreme Court – told Channel 9’s 60 Minutes he was “fighting for the truth” and questioned WA Police’s handing of evidence and leads in the case.



The show also aired claims a seed pod found in Mrs Rayney’s body bag had been planted by police.

Mrs Rayney went missing after a boot-scooting class in Bentley on August 7, 2007, her body later discovered buried in King’s Park.

Police could not establish a cause of death but soon focused their efforts on Mr Rayney, which he said biased the investigation and missed the opportunity to find the person actually responsible for his wife’s death.



In the 60 Minutes report, forensic specialist Robin Napper said two alternative suspects – Ivan Eades and Allon Mitchell Lacco – were both linked by evidence to the vicinity of the Rayney home leading up to Mrs Rayney’s disappearance, but neither were properly investigated.

Lacco lived in an apartment block near the Bentley Community Centre, where Mrs Rayney took boot-scooting classes, and sold drugs in its car park.

Eades – Lacco’s cousin – lived near the Rayneys and a cigarette butt containing his DNA was found discarded outside their house.

Both men were convicted violent sexual offenders, and Mr Napper said evidence placed both of them near the Rayney house on the day Mrs Rayney disappeared.

Mr Napper said phone records showed Lacco making calls from a phone block about a block from the Rayneys’ home on the day Mrs Rayney disappeared, and was pulled over days after her body was found for driving without a license.

When Lacco’s car was searched police found a knife, as well as sand in the boot. In the course of being arrested, Lacco mentioned Mrs Rayney’s disappearance, including a claim – that she had been carjacked – which hadn’t been aired in any coverage of the case.

60 Minutes also reported Lacco was alleged to have told passengers “there’s a body going in there” when driving through King’s Park before Mrs Rayney went missing.

As for the seed pod found by police in Mrs Rayney’s body bag, Mr Napper said an inconsistency with forensic material found in the pod raised suspicions it was planted by police.

Despite being “loaded” with material from the Rayney home, there was nothing to suggest the pod had been buried in the sandy bush grave in King’s Park.

The judge presiding over Mr Rayney’s murder trial also doubted the validity of the seed pod as evidence and refused to accept it.

60 Minutes also aired the revelation a resident living in the area had reported a scream coming from King’s Park, ignored by police despite several others claiming to have also heard the scream. It contradicts police’s claim Mrs Rayney was murdered at her home.

At Mr Rayney’s trial in the WA Supreme Court much was made of the couple’s turbulent private life as emails between the two revealed a marriage breakdown and allegations of infidelity.

On the night Mrs Rayney went missing, the two were to meet to discuss their separation.

But Mr Rayney – who gave police access to their emails at the start of the investigation – said a lot of claims his wife made in them were “exaggerated” or “simply not true”.

He said despite being cleared of any wrongdoing twice in court, and after winning a defamation case he brought against WA Police last year, there was still public animosity against him.

Mr Rayney said he believed it was “most likely” his wife was attacked after she left boot-scooting.

Martin Bennett, Mr Rayney’s lawyer, said the damage from the case would continue “for the rest of his career”.

“All that occurs is that people now say ‘oh well he obviously didn’t kill her, he arranged for someone to kill her’,” Mr Bennett said.

“They just adjust their view to still attribute guilt but in a ‘he must be very clever to have got away with it’ type of thing.”

Mr Bennett also revealed he had received anonymous hate mail since representing Mr Rayney in his trial – as had forensic experts whose evidence strengthened the case for acquittal.

Mr Rayney called for “proper, right-minded” police independent from the initial investigation to “do their job now” and look for his wife’s real killer.

WA Police declined to be interviewed for the show, 60 Minutes reported.
 
Completely one-sided interview, which is to be expected I guess. 60 Minutes are claiming Lacco or Eades could have murdered Corryn, buried her in Kings Park and then dumped her car nearby without leaving any traces of DNA on her body/car/near the burial site?
 
Completely one-sided interview, which is to be expected I guess. 60 Minutes are claiming Lacco or Eades could have murdered Corryn, buried her in Kings Park and then dumped her car nearby without leaving any traces of DNA on her body/car/near the burial site?

And, left a hankie under her head...... and, didn't steal anything..... and, had no motive.... and, left a placecard with Lloyd Rayney's name near the gravesite. Me thinks not.

When the placecard was last seen at a dinner event - Lloyd Rayney had it - he was driving his own car giving a lift to 2 fellow lawyers that night after the event and Corryn was interstate on a trip.

IMO; I think he pulled a dirty shirt out of Laundry - the placecard was still in his dirty shirt pocket and upon changing clothes that night - it fell out onto the Kings Park bushland ----- fluttering away to be found a week later. For me - All arrows point to the person who had the Motive.
 
Last edited:
That 60minutes special was as close as I’ve ever seen to propaganda in the guise of reporting.

Enormous amounts of factual errors and they only interviewed people on his defence team.
Outrageous and he wants more money.

When he said he kept nothing from his wife, did he honestly expect people to believe that considering he was wiretapping her phone?
 
Gosh, I'd somehow never heard of this case before the 60 minutes special. When I saw an ad showing a snippet of him answering a question, I straight away said to my partner 'he did it'. But after watching the whole thing I said 'ok, maybe he didn't do it'.

Now coming here to read they left so much out...I'm off to educate myself.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
91
Guests online
1,290
Total visitors
1,381

Forum statistics

Threads
591,783
Messages
17,958,840
Members
228,606
Latest member
wdavewong
Back
Top