JerseyWasHome2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
- Messages
- 2,508
- Reaction score
- 23,983
Random thoughts ~
To premeditate something as horrific as this, one would think he would have been more prepared. Not only did SW have a dr's appt that was missed that am, didn't I read that it was one of the girl's first day at school? He had to have known people would be calling, but maybe he thought he could just say the daughter was ill. And then report them missing in a few days meanwhile... answering her myriad of texts she receives each day? He had to know people would wonder within HOURS, as NU did, that something was wrong.
She obviously trusted him with the girls' care or she never would have gone to AZ that weekend and left them alone with him. That tells me that while they may have been discussing a separation, nothing triggered a warning to her that he may be unstable, or abusive, or anything along those lines.
She may have "worn the pants" in the family, but even if his income was on the lower end, he probably provided the medical insurance through his employer, which as we all know isn't cheap, esp with dependents. Her comments that he "didn't have game" imply she thought she had him wrapped around her finger and she'd NEVER anticipate him leaving or even wanting to leave. She probably felt who would want him? How could he conquer someone else? "He had no game." Could he have served her with divorce papers that night? Something that made her realize he did indeed want to leave?
Did she have some sort of "dirt" on him that he felt could never be exposed, perhaps making him afraid he'd never see his girls again? A mistress/affair wouldn't affect custody, I wouldn't think. What about having a SUPPOSED gay lover? Probably not. But family embarassment and all that, assuming that's true. Still may not affect any legal ruling over custody.
So hard to keep track of what was mentioned here when, but I thought I read "recently" that someone wrote SW was involved in a few MLMs prior to Thrive including a cosmetics one called Younique. Um, the supposed gay lover is supposedly affiliated with that product. Coincidence?
If she was selling car tire rims in NC, I still can't get my head around how that'd qualify her for a construction loan or mortgage on a $300-400,000 home. The general rule, on average, is that you qualify for a mortgage that's 2.5x your salary. Banks got into trouble by offering people loans that ate up more income, but even if the 2.5x rule applied, and even if she had money from the divorce to put down, which I don't think she did because it's been said she sold the NC home with a whopping $8000 or so "profit," then to qualify for even a $300,000 loan she'd have had to have been making about $120,000/year. How? I know it's unrelated to the murders, but just part of the thoughts that swirl through my head trying to understand this case.
Ok, last random thought for now, if you've read this far. With the oodles of FB videos, I'm guessing the prosecution may show the jury ones where she raves about how great he is, but will his defense team show various ones where she subtly puts him down? All this social media stuff is still so new. The poor jury could spend hours and hours, days and days, watching them, rewatching them. How to choose what gets shown if any?
To premeditate something as horrific as this, one would think he would have been more prepared. Not only did SW have a dr's appt that was missed that am, didn't I read that it was one of the girl's first day at school? He had to have known people would be calling, but maybe he thought he could just say the daughter was ill. And then report them missing in a few days meanwhile... answering her myriad of texts she receives each day? He had to know people would wonder within HOURS, as NU did, that something was wrong.
She obviously trusted him with the girls' care or she never would have gone to AZ that weekend and left them alone with him. That tells me that while they may have been discussing a separation, nothing triggered a warning to her that he may be unstable, or abusive, or anything along those lines.
She may have "worn the pants" in the family, but even if his income was on the lower end, he probably provided the medical insurance through his employer, which as we all know isn't cheap, esp with dependents. Her comments that he "didn't have game" imply she thought she had him wrapped around her finger and she'd NEVER anticipate him leaving or even wanting to leave. She probably felt who would want him? How could he conquer someone else? "He had no game." Could he have served her with divorce papers that night? Something that made her realize he did indeed want to leave?
Did she have some sort of "dirt" on him that he felt could never be exposed, perhaps making him afraid he'd never see his girls again? A mistress/affair wouldn't affect custody, I wouldn't think. What about having a SUPPOSED gay lover? Probably not. But family embarassment and all that, assuming that's true. Still may not affect any legal ruling over custody.
So hard to keep track of what was mentioned here when, but I thought I read "recently" that someone wrote SW was involved in a few MLMs prior to Thrive including a cosmetics one called Younique. Um, the supposed gay lover is supposedly affiliated with that product. Coincidence?
If she was selling car tire rims in NC, I still can't get my head around how that'd qualify her for a construction loan or mortgage on a $300-400,000 home. The general rule, on average, is that you qualify for a mortgage that's 2.5x your salary. Banks got into trouble by offering people loans that ate up more income, but even if the 2.5x rule applied, and even if she had money from the divorce to put down, which I don't think she did because it's been said she sold the NC home with a whopping $8000 or so "profit," then to qualify for even a $300,000 loan she'd have had to have been making about $120,000/year. How? I know it's unrelated to the murders, but just part of the thoughts that swirl through my head trying to understand this case.
Ok, last random thought for now, if you've read this far. With the oodles of FB videos, I'm guessing the prosecution may show the jury ones where she raves about how great he is, but will his defense team show various ones where she subtly puts him down? All this social media stuff is still so new. The poor jury could spend hours and hours, days and days, watching them, rewatching them. How to choose what gets shown if any?
Eventually I found a doc who listened, did a hysterectomy, and found severe scarring from years of guess what? Endometriosis. Pain free 6 years now! But the point is maybe it's possible that her fertility wasn't affected even though that would be expected with Lupus. Again, I DON'T KNOW much about Lupus.
