Plo_Koon
Former Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2016
- Messages
- 359
- Reaction score
- 2,778
From that article:
This is a fine idea, and there should be some distinction when referring to the media at large, but in this case the facts simply don’t bear out the premise that the press was not involved in an early pile-on. In fact, dozens of reporters Tweeted these very things, on the day the story broke.
The same journalists who were reporting the facts released by the CPD, were the ones stoking the flames on social media.
So they may have been simply reporting the facts on television and in print, but that didn’t extend to their commentary on Twitter, for example.
That’s where the problem lies.
I do agree that is a problem as far as Twitter is concerned. The original post was making a point that this is why ALL MSM sources should not be believed. I was talking about MSM sites, not Twitter accounts.