bos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2011
- Messages
- 588
- Reaction score
- 2,961
I know it’s not going to be 100% certainty but there is doubt.
Ok, PR may have paraphillias which have caused offending behaviour. Even if he is found guilty of the 12 charges associated with that, it is doubtful that the prosecution can use previous offences/convictions as part of their narrative that PR is a creep.
Usually previous offences are not made public until after a jury has reached a verdict but if they were, literature suggests that between 5&10% of flashers progress to a contact sexual offence i.e. 90-95% don’t.
So, if we strip out the previous “creep” aspect, what are we left with? A man who claims to have left a young woman unharmed in a park and a number of passers by in the area who have not come forward to police because they have something to hide. In that scenario I’d be unhappy to convict PR.
Ok, PR may have paraphillias which have caused offending behaviour. Even if he is found guilty of the 12 charges associated with that, it is doubtful that the prosecution can use previous offences/convictions as part of their narrative that PR is a creep.
Usually previous offences are not made public until after a jury has reached a verdict but if they were, literature suggests that between 5&10% of flashers progress to a contact sexual offence i.e. 90-95% don’t.
So, if we strip out the previous “creep” aspect, what are we left with? A man who claims to have left a young woman unharmed in a park and a number of passers by in the area who have not come forward to police because they have something to hide. In that scenario I’d be unhappy to convict PR.