Good point. I wonder about that aspect. Was the visit to the trail a spur of the moment thing that day or something they looked forward to a few days prior?
Oooooh, really not liking the implication I've seen a couple times here that violent offenders do violent things partly because they were bullied. That is so very rarely the actual case.
Early this morning on ABC news, the press conference was reported. A newsman who was there said the audience was being filmed, and everyone who entered the room had to sign their name to a sign in sheet
It's about WAY more than bullying alone. Disaffected, serious repressed anger, powerlessness, etc.
It's about WAY more than bullying alone. Disaffected, serious repressed anger, powerlessness, etc.
They will never give the COD until the suspect is in custody and going to trial! That isn’t something you can say without jeopardizing the whole case.
The girls were found around noon on the 14th!
They were found the next day because the night before, searches had been called off! I believe people still searched, but with it being dark, made it difficult.
We aren’t sure why there was description of vehicle ...everyone has theories.
I mentioned this before: I think the memory of the car wasn’t recent. I think possibly LE needs the car to be tied to the suspect and that when the new (2nd) sketch was created, that’s when the witness mentioned the car. I’m just trying to make sense of how the car is relevant now instead of 2 years ago. Maybe it was ruled out then and they are now taking a second look.I agree. The car was not discussed at the beginning of the investigation, but two years later. And while it was the first item talked about at the PC, it just kind of came and went, to be mentioned nevermore. Unless they got a new tip, I feel the car is mostly important to whomever the PC was directed at. As in, "crap, they know my car was there."
I think it’s important not to get too caught up in how old the sketch makes the murderer appear. Many people appear much younger (or older) than their actual age. I’m guessing the age range is broad so that people don’t rule anyone out because they think they’re too old or too young. MOO of course.
The 'guys' thing is rough.
On the one hand, I'd hate to see it take over the thread.
On the other - LE released additional audio where the ONLY thing new is the word 'guys'. I am guessing that it's in the hope that someone who knows this a-hole recognizes his voice, but even so, it's hard not to focus on that.
My two cents - I use 'guys' a lot, but it's typically with people I am familiar with, at the least.
But if LE has the vehicle, they know who owns it, who it’s registered to.I think its aimed at somebody who closely knows the suspect and their specific vehicle. JMO
I’ve always wondered why she recorded rather than ran, or if she was even recording him. Maybe, instead, she was recording something/someone else and he was merely in the background at some point?
Why would they say this?Remember too that LE says the man may look younger than he actually is. New sketch could absolutely be of someone in their 30s.