bradfordsleuth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2014
- Messages
- 1,125
- Reaction score
- 11,537
Can you imagine???Is anyone else wondering if the first “witness” looks an awful lot like the 2nd sketch?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you imagine???Is anyone else wondering if the first “witness” looks an awful lot like the 2nd sketch?
You know something I thought about as far as The Shack reference. It could be they think the perp thinks with satisfaction about "how he left them". Now LE comes in and says, "let me interrupt your daydream". Just a thought.
Yes....if they know who this is and still aren't moving on him they must not have DNA. They can't know who it is AND have DNA and still have no arrest, can they? Unless it's just DNA from a cigarette or something. Alternatively, if they do have good DNA (i.e. from underneath fingernails), they do not know who this is.
Just my opinion - while standing still, yes, but while walking, no. Especially if you are walking on precarious turf.I wonder about the hands of the perp in his trousers.
I am from the Netherlands Europe and men here keep there hands in the pockets of their jackets.
I don’t want to start a “Guys” discussion but is it common in the US to put your hands in your trouser pockets?
I thought he meant the book the shack and the movie the shack.If you go with the religious connotation idea, could the "book" he mentioned directly after The Shack be referencing the Bible?
There were out buildings, but we have to assume LE searched them?
I thought about Ron Logan yesterday when the new old sketch was released. It’s release back the. Would have saved him a lot of suspicion.
True. But that also would be the case if they didn’t show the 2nd picture because they thought it was someone who had a reason to be there as some have speculated.In that case you would think they would have a name and contact info to move on.
I do not believe that the girls knew BG. There was something about BG that let Liberty know that something was not quite right. I believe that this is why she started filming. If she knew this person, I think that she would have spoken his name. She also could have texted or alerted her family. It could be the case of one degree of separation, but I do not believe that either girl personally knew BG.
Why are we looking at this?
- The movie reference is also interesting. Many theories have been thrown around already which range from it being just a reference to an appeal to BG. Yet, it can also be a way for LE and BG to communicate. I offer that perhaps BG has already communicated with the police and said something to the effect or "I want to turn myself in but it needs to be on my terms. If you agree then somehow reference this movie in the media." Then the reference is a "message received" and opens further the lines of communication between the suspect and LE. Several times this has happened before going all the way back to the Zodiac and cooperation between the press and LE has been well documented.
So what's the "new direction" the investigation is going?
Still hoping for justice for Abby and Libby!
YES!! This was my very first thought as well, but I wasn't sure if I should go there. It seemed to me that it would tie everything together. But then I thought well they must not have DNA then
I would like more discussion about that comment too. When he said "How you left them is NOT what they are experiencing today"..Lets unpack that comment..Since the general public has no idea how they were left, does this imply that they were posed in some kind of way?
Also, regarding the audio clip they released - I'm fairly certain that they have digitally removed or distorted something between the "Guys" and the "Down the hill"... This makes me think that the "Guys" was said at a different time than the "Down the Hill", but they wanted to present them together for the sake of comparison. MOO.
Originally, so did I. I also didn't think much of the religious context of what he said beyond what any typical God fearing person might say in reference to someone so evil. But I listened to the PC again this morning and he says he recently watched a movie called The Shack, and there's a book that talks about evil, etc. etc. I guess it can be taken both ways, but the words he specifically used after this are words from the Bible. JMOI thought he meant the book the shack and the movie the shack.