Hopefully warrants for her electronic devices have been served. People leave important footprints.
The bottom line, IMO, is that she was not returning calls to work, yet she clearly had possession of her phone (per the video) and was freely talking to others during that time. So the fact that she was "missing" for that part of the day was clearly her choice. In the video at 5:50, she is still walking around of her own free will. So, IMO, being at that apartment was her choice. But whether it was her choice to STILL be missing is the question here. I do hope they have a warrant for her electronic data.
I was just thinking if we agree she was intoxicated by alcohol or drugs (still not sure) maybe she contacted the ex? You know some folks get tipsy and then call exes to get back together, maybe she saw something on SM to make her desperate to go see him. He does not take her calls and ignores her so she goes to his apartment. This is all a crazy speculation on my part. I have read the relationship was on and off but do we know when the last time they were "on" was. Was it recent in the last few weeks? Months?
Oh, I hadn't thought of that. That makes complete sense to me, except that they have said there is no sign of foul play... We know they have spoken with the person she was on the phone with, and that person apparently did not know where she was at the time they were on the phone. (At least that is what I remember being reported; I'll go back and see how it's been stated by LE.)My opinion, and only my opinion is that the person she was on the phone with is the ex-boyfriend who lives there and he is a POI or suspect but they're aren't releasing that information. Just my thoughts now that they have said he lives there and the status of their relationship.
If she blew off work and was at his apartment on the afternoon before she disappeared, it's likely that their on/off relationship was "on" that day. I'm curious about the nature of their relationship. Her sister describes that as a "bad" relationship, and presumably she means it was unhealthy for Prisma. Could that mean absence of commitment, drug use, something in between?
Regardless, it is still possible that she had a nice visit with him in the afternoon, and a random stranger grabbed her as she was going to her car.
I chuckled, yes I agree it would be "on" that day? What would make her blow off work to spend the day with him? She would have to understand she would likely lose her job, right? They were trying to reach her and she did not take the calls?
I am curious about the nature of their relationship as well. It also makes sense why she would not tell family, friends or the babysitter she was visiting the ex, if everyone considered it a "bad" relationship.
Work stated she left for lunch at 1, the babysitter said she spoke to her at 3 or 4 and they spoke about her new job at the car dealer. Did she give the babysitter the impression she was at work at that time? Do we know if she was caught on CCTV arriving at the apartment? Was she there since right around lunch or was she just arriving at 5:50?
I do not recall if her arrival time was mentioned. Wasn’t it reported that she was captured on video getting out of her car?I chuckled, yes I agree it would be "on" that day? What would make her blow off work to spend the day with him? She would have to understand she would likely lose her job, right? They were trying to reach her and she did not take the calls?
I am curious about the nature of their relationship as well. It also makes sense why she would not tell family, friends or the babysitter she was visiting the ex, if everyone considered it a "bad" relationship.
Work stated she left for lunch at 1, the babysitter said she spoke to her at 3 or 4 and they spoke about her new job at the car dealer. Did she give the babysitter the impression she was at work at that time? Do we know if she was caught on CCTV arriving at the apartment? Was she there since right around lunch or was she just arriving at 5:50?
My understanding is that she told the babysitter she was at lunch at that time. I guess she was indeed still "at lunch," but at that point her job was trying to reach her and she was not responding to their calls.
I do not recall if her arrival time was mentioned. Wasn’t it reported that she was captured on video getting out of her car?