I don't agree with your statement here at all. This is a murder trial and vague statements are inadequate:
"That’s how you get that arc that shows that approximately that cell phone is, you know, a mile, a mile-and-a-half away from that tower,” Pfoff said.
The search warrants are replete with this same vague language "likely" "at or near" and so on.
I do not consider your post to be logic but rather illogic. PF and KB phones are never shown to be together, traveling or otherwise. <modsnipped>
Verizon timestamps are accurate, and Verizon distance to tower to one-tenth of a mile is accurate. The SW demands a suspension of reality that PF traveled 90mph for 1.2 miles in 48 seconds per that graphic and text in SW18-112 page15. If you think that's not correct, then do determine a rate of travel for that event discussed, and keep us all informed, thanks in advance.
So the FBI expert got it wrong, the investigators who saw this information got it wrong, the defense missed it at the probable cause hearing, the expert consulted by the media got it wrong, and you have it right.
Got it.
This is one specific period of time over two days. If there is an error there, big deal.
There’s a mountain of digital data that shows that Kelsey and PF’s phones were together over that two day period.
The ghost of Kelsey was not hovering around with her cell phone, in close proximity to PF’s phone.
To believe that this is some sort of coincidence, is inherently illogical.
PF lied about when he last saw Kelsey.
When he left that house, her phone immediately began doing all sorts of bizarre things, things that continued over the next two days.
Their phones left her house at the same time.
Dead people don’t send texts.
Dead people don’t make phone calls.
Her phone should have been no where near his, and certainly not interacting with the same tower.
It was though. Because PF bashed Kelsey’s face in, and tried to fool everyone.
I’m not fooled.
