Just some fluids, Mommy and Daddy, many kisses, maybe some ice cream(!), a warm bath, a long sleep in a soft bed, and he'll be good as new. And maybe a fenced-in yard!!
Still smiling!
That poor baby is covered in dirt and small scratches. I believe he was really out there the entire time. MOO.
Remember, the case is not closed. Previous msm reports
The child was “possibly” outside for nearly three days & no criminality “currently”, per KSP Trooper Petry.
After the first 23 hours, he may not have had a need to "go" very often if he was low on food and fluids. But I am amazed and glad that he still had it on.littke K needs a diaper commercial. I’ve never heard of a diaper lasting for three days.
My impression was, when MSM said that they had to use a bucket-type thing to get him, was that he had fallen down a hill and it was too steep for them to go and get him without the bucket. He may not have had to walk up much of an incline to fall down where he was found. I could be totally out of whack on this because I don't know what a strip mine area is like.I took it to mean he was near a drop-off area. Like if he was at the top of a ravine and he could have fallen down had he walked that way. I don't think they meant he was on a small piece of land high up somewhere, but I could be wrong. Either way, thank goodness he was found and not seriously harmed! MOO.
Thanks much for that great update, P-Z -- and a dog did help the searchers! Bravo Hank! My faith is restored. Look at that beautiful bloodhound -- typical slobber and all! This four-legged pro helped many two-legged heroes to know where to go looking. Lots of champions on this one!Thank you guys for the warm welcome!
Whew, what a day! First we heard they were gonna call off the search today, if nothing turned up again. Then we heard the dogs hit on something last night! Sure enough, he led them to the area the baby was found in. The folks from Rough Terrain Rescue posted this today:
We have had several comments and questions about our efforts last night. Our oldest hound Hank along with Handler Bill Reed and support Jacob Preece was able to establish a direction of travel last night, this information promoted search managers to concentrate on a specific area. This information ultimately lead searchers to Kenneth's location
A local fireman was the one who actually found him. They heard him cry, and kept looking. Thank God he was strong enough still to cry. My entire office burst into tears when we heard the news. He's with his mom and dad at the hospital now.
Folks wonder how he could make it in the hills so long? He's a hillbilly. We are born and raised in these hills. I spent my childhood wandering up and down these hills and hollers, barefoot half the time. He's a little mountain man! lol. Seriously, though, I believe that baby had angels with him.
I dont think there is ANY question of any type of foul play. A POSSIBILITY of maybe negligence, maybe, if that. There's rumors and some facts, but this was never nothing intentional or evil.
OH, how happy we are tonight!
A big hand for ole Hank!
I believe this case was exactly what it looks like it was-a little boy wandered off and wound up further from home than anyone thought. I don't think there was foul play involved. I DID think that, before he was found, but I don't now. I hope those rumors are put to rest soon.
I've never taken offence to being called a "hillbilly." It's always felt a bit like a badge of honor. Good for the little guy for hanging in there.
Right? I think the outcome would have been different if he had been found even a day later.Wow that’s interesting. Thank goodness he was found when he was!
Agree wholeheartedly with everything you've said.I think you're combining "words" from two different stories and sources and combining them to infer one, or at least emphasize, a possibility of nefariousness.
IMO, neither one of the quoted words from either makes that so, or infers so based upon the original context they were each used separately in.
"Possibly" came in the context of the official sources saying the child had been lost for three days and possibly out in the elements for all three of those. IMO, that doesn't mean they need to rule out kidnapping etc, it means the child was lost for three days and possibly out in the elements for all three (IE: had not found shelter to hide in for any of those for example).
"Currently" means there is no reason to doubt the story as of now (yet you obviously do by your postings). As to "No criminality currently" - that doesn't mean there was a crime involved in this child disappearing or that anyone was involved, it just means that in this case, just as in every other case of missing children (both safely recovered and not so) that the guardian(s) of the child are going to be looked at (investigated) for possible negligence. If found to be so, then criminal charges can be laid. That's a standard investigative follow-up with missing kids and IMO in no way hints at nefarious or criminal activity being involved in the actual initial disappearance.
Same for the multitudes of comments on Dad's story changing and the inferences being made by some in that manner; sure, no breaking of TOS there, but some ensured their inferences were very obvious. Meanwhile, they were writings from papers -none with direct quotation marks around the dad's supposed words like this, "blah blah": Rule one in reading print media is "If it isn't in direct quotation marks, then it is not a direct quote from the source" it's someone else's words talking about what someone else said - it's heresy. It's also from initial media reports -very famously known for their INaccuracy as shown time after time after time after time after time ….
Likewise for the commentary in here regarding mom's SM and her apparent relationship issues. Not a word 'directly' against TOS, but certain as heck to be obvious to this little guy one day when he grows up and reads his name and thread here. Ironic then that the TOS are written in a way hoping to avoid exactly that kind of speculative stuff about the family - (the victims until official source statements indicate otherwise).
IMO, those that chose to sit on their hands until/if any evidence or statements from official sources came along to actually indicate something nefarious had occurred did the right thing.
After the first 23 hours, he may not have had a need to "go" very often if he was low on food and fluids. But I am amazed and glad that he still had it on.
And yes, that diaper was about as tuff as that little boy!!
One of the member's whose husband was involved in the rescue pointed out that the group on the ledge with the child were equipped with water, supplies and … pull-ups. I'm pretty certain that awesome photo of this little warrior was taken after they had tended to his immediate needs … having had 4 little ones of my own - a diaper change was probably pretty high on the list (whether or not he still had one on when found).
This little man was meant to be here - of that I am certain.
Im a proud hillbilly, too. If you've never been to our local "Hillbilly Days" festival, I suggest you come! Its awesome.
I think the same as you. Its easy for us to be jaded, and think the worst, as so many of these stories do. We hear time after time "missing baby" and then find out parents or someone family killed it. It makes this story even better, that it didn't turn out that way.
I've been watching this one from the beginning. WS has all of us jaded because we know what the outcome usually is. I'm SOOOOO happy that this one turned out so well!! What a sweet boy!
Speaking of how long before they reported him missing, well, I tend to give a little leeway here because of our experience with our own son.
We live in the country, a doctor owns 400 acres behind us. Now, eventually a mile or so away it leads to more houses, but it's heavily wooded and hilly. My son was around 2 and we were working in the yard. He was RIGHT by me playing. I went to plant something, turned around and he was gone. Vanished. I watched him like a hawk. I hollered for him, checked with my husband around back, we went through the house, back outside again and still could not find him!! Panic started setting in, but you don't really believe your child could get away from you that fast so you keep searching. We searched and searched and I decided to go through the house one more time looking in and under everything (even though he wasn't the kind of child to hide like that). I walk back to the master bath and flip on the light. There he sat going potty :O We had been hollering at him and he never answered. He just sat there in the dark doing what he needed to do. Funny now, but we were just getting ready to call the police and report him missing. But....the timeframe, probably 20-30 minutes. Like I said, you keep thinking they are just hiding somewhere. Or went to lay down and are hidden. You just don't think your child will walk off into the woods, especially when they are raised there and know better. So, I always tend to give the benefit of the doubt when I hear about someone's delay in reporting something. We don't ever want to think our "person" is missing, they will be right back, surely.
I really hope there isn't negligence in this one. I'm soooooo happy he survived! What a tough little cookie!