ab01
Ooh Rah
- Joined
- May 10, 2016
- Messages
- 3,818
- Reaction score
- 34,592
I think uncle Alex is full of surprises.
Moo
He’s full of something alright.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think uncle Alex is full of surprises.
Moo
She was on today as well. My understanding is that to be verified, she needs the close family to validate her, and if they aren't willing for whatever reason (privacy, grief, etc), there you are. I really appreciate the input of locals, whether they are associated with the family or not - so invaluable in a case to understand the local "scene".Haven't seen her on here since last night. Perhaps she was sharing too much, and needed to step away? Not sure she was able to be verified and its just too hard not to give details. It would be a dilemma for sure.
AgreedShe was on today as well. My understanding is that to be verified, she needs the close family to validate her, and if they aren't willing for whatever reason (privacy, grief, etc), there you are. I really appreciate the input of locals, whether they are associated with the family or not - so invaluable in a case to understand the local "scene".
Oops, I just posted before I read this.
I think it can only be a doorbell camera that captured them, maybe belonging to a nearby house, not enough info to show his direction of travel.
Even blood droplets from both would not prove they bled at the same time, right? I doubt he was losing blood, he had enough to travel afoot for hours.
Moo
I know LE stated they have no video of Liz’ but possibly they don’t want to reveal that mom or a neighbor did have a camera.
I can’t think of any other proof they were both outside, together. Even if a weapon was found, it doesn’t put them together. Moo
Also, I notice that more and more states are now requiring warrants for cell phone searches, even when the subject gives permission. I'm on the fence about both but in the end I guess we have to look long term and so it's probably important to assure one less factor for an appeal.In a murder case search warrant are always obtained, even when consent is given.
ETA... Consent can be withdrawn at any time. The warrant ensures the police have probable cause to believe a crime was committed before they go searching through your Castle, and can't be revoked by the homeowner.
I don’t even know! She was missing 30 hours before she was found. I recall seeing a photo or news story that had either a cop or DSHS worker sitting on the couch. So disturbing.
Case in point: Cheryl McVarish, Mississauga, ON, Canada. Found one week after "disappearing" laid out in the driveway. Was determined she never left the property. I know this case personally and it was bizarre to say the least.Probably a very long shot...but hoping the house itself was searched really, really well...would not be the first time a missing person was later found deceased inside the house much later.
If he burried her in the muck, you would think that LE would only be looking in areas where there was muck...So if we are now to assume the window is 2:30am- 6:30am - and he has pants that appear wet from the knees down in the video(all links up thread) where did he leave her ? Don’t they have infrared imaging ? Why can’t they find her if she is not buried ? Could the wetness of the pants if true be related to him burying her in muck? And that’s why?
Maybe he is one of people who get nose bleeds super easily? If my brother sneezes too hard his gushes blood. Wouldn’t leave any traumatic type marks on his body. That is if she fought with him and maybe hit his. Just an idea. JMO.Oops, I just posted before I read this.
I think it can only be a doorbell camera that captured them, maybe belonging to a nearby house, not enough info to show his direction of travel.
Even blood droplets from both would not prove they bled at the same time, right? I doubt he was losing blood, he had enough to travel afoot for hours.
Moo
I know LE stated they have no video of Liz’ but possibly they don’t want to reveal that mom or a neighbor did have a camera.
I can’t think of any other proof they were both outside, together. Even if a weapon was found, it doesn’t put them together. Moo
There was a women who went missing after hurricane Katrina... her boyfriend put her in a trunk and moved her around with him for years. Mummy found in trunk in N.O. house; former boyfriend on trial for murder - nola.comThe child in the UK even longer, in the attic...weeks? And a woman recently found buried in either a wall or a cellar...and there was another woman found under her bed/against wall who had been reported as missing...for at least a day or two before finally found. Rare but has happened.
But saybthey found an article of clothing containing dna from both. It can’t prove she was there, the article could have been removed from the home, imo. Idk, just guessing .I think that’s enough to say that they can connect him to being with her outside the home if none of this same dna evidence is found within the home.
how would they know?I hate to say this but if LS's DNA is somewhere it shouldn't be on his body, that's going to be hard to defend, I'd think.
Welcome YepperBepper, pleased that you are now posting.
I also think, perhaps AW has passed this child on to someone else, for 'monies/goodies' that he will be collecting for his drug habit.
MOO.
Per today's press conference police have absolutely no video footage of Lizzy, just AW walking alone around 6:45 am.
I just wonder how they can prove that, though. If they found an object that had DNA or fingerprints outside, couldn’t it be possible that he brought it outside with him? I think the only way they could definitively prove that both of them were outside together is if there was drops of both of their blood, right? Or does anyone have any other ideas?
The UK is covered in CCTV and people still go missing there. So I wouldn't take this to mean that she didn't leave the house. (Not saying you implied that, just building off the thought). MOO etc.Per today's press conference police have absolutely no video footage of Lizzy, just AW walking alone around 6:45 am.
Oh good theory! You’re right that maybe there is a camera somewhere and they don’t want to give this info up. And yes you’re right that both of their blood outside doesn’t prove anything. Images of them definitely give irrefutable evidence though. I hope that is the case.
Yeah, you’re probably right. Sigh.
Have they said what the DNA of hers is that was found on him? Or what the DNA is that linked them together outside? The only thing I can think of linking them outside is blood, but I can’t see how she could have made him bleed beyond maybe a scratch.
I guess I’m hung up on they say he isn’t cooperating and they say they have this evidence but they haven’t given any details so it’s hard to be confident that they aren’t just trying to keep local people calm. I know I would panic if someone kidnapped a kid from their room in my town!
If he was being railroaded by the cops, anything short of telling the cops what they want to hear is going to = not cooperative, so that part doesn’t really impact me much.
Dang. I just don’t want to believe an uncle would do this. I don’t know who else would, and like you guys say, too many coincidences. Of course it’s him.