SuperTmo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 4,810
- Reaction score
- 20,970
I'm still not buying the hitman angle. Hitmen don't clean up or hide bodies. They make it look random, like a robbery or carjacking. I did wonder about the life insurance though, it wouldn't be the first time a man took one out, or possibly even had one left from when they were married? Esp if her family was a major source of income. JMO
Yeah, good point on the hitman not hiding a body. But I’m definitely thinking he thought he could escape the country with the kids or just wouldn’t be caught. I believe he thought he could have full custody of the kids in order to cash in on any life insurance (even if he wasn’t the beneficiary) or inheritance they might have coming. It is HIGHLY likely these two are well insured and that the policies had to stay in effect during the divorce. He may not be the beneficiary anymore but the kids probably would be.